>zara

>>11916013
These are glorious tbqh

File: file.png (488KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

488KB, 1024x1024px

>>11916013
might cop some zara shit tbqh

can't justify CP prices in a meme colour but blue would be nice for some fits

>>11916055
cunts like you shouldn't be allowed to post on here

>>11916063
that's nice

>>11916013
>>11916055
>>11916061
when it comes to shoes they really don't give a fuck anymore. it looks like they order fakes from china and resell them. SS17 they will probably sell yeezys

>>11916013
I was just about to make this exact thread

>>11916023
kys

>>11916061
what's the shoe being copied here?

>>11917221
Acne velcros, I forget the exact name

>>11916013
>german roshe runners

File: file.png (231KB, 900x757px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 900x757px

>>11917221
acne triple lo

>>11917221
adidas rafs imo

Why doesn't adidas sue them? I know Zara is a colossus but adidas is also pretty big

>>11917257
i think with clothing this is allowed. they dont put their logo on and they dont copy 1:1.

>>11917143
shameless

File: 5514102040_2_6_1.jpg (59KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 1024x1024px

>>11917143

kek

>>11916013
Great legal team.

>>11916013
What the fuck, it looks like Rick Owens Runners

>>11917257

Adidas would need a design patent to prevent fakes from being created. It's not likely that the get one for each and every piece of clothing they make. Secondly, its notoriously hard to get a design patent for clothing.

>>11917558
w2c? not bad at all

>>11918065
They're on zara's site under men's shoes. I don't think there's any shame in buying a shoe that is $400 cheaper

>>11917574
Don't even need that, Cant patent a shoe. Maybe something very specific like a kevlar lacing system on hiking boots or something. Look at how many shoes are blatant Converse/Vans copies.

File: 0340432407_6_1_1.jpg (204KB, 1188x723px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 1188x723px

it will never stop

>>11918390
this is the episode where SLP tricks Zara into making something really stupid

>>11917574
>>11916013
At least 95% of population doesn't realise what piece of clothing is being copied here. If the brands made a fuss about it, it would be more likely that people would buy it just because it's a copy expensive designer clothing. Zara can't promote it as stolen designer patterns as well obviously, so nobody does anything.

People look and think - hey, it's a nice shoe - and buy it, nobody thinks that they are getting a knock off, hell, even I couldn't tell what some pieces copy. Maybe there is not a single design that Zara designers came up with completely by themselves, who knows.

File: 7014130800_2_2_1.jpg (148KB, 1300x1667px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 1300x1667px

>you study fashion to end up rip off pieces for Zara or Bershka

>>11917558
Which shoe is being copied here? They sorta look like Buscemis without the one thing that would really make them Buscemis: the loop on the back

>>11918911
From off-withe+black color combination I would guess Dick Owen.

File: 7218132001_1_1_1.jpg (129KB, 1300x1664px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 1300x1664px

>better than original
Top kek

serious question: how can they get away with this?

File: 5512102040_2_20_1.jpg (101KB, 1024x1024px)

101KB, 1024x1024px

So I heard you like ann d :^]

This is hilarious based zara don't give a fuck

>>11918931
Those are absolutely nothing like ann d

>>11918925
It's a theft only when they copy it 1:1 or put brand on it. Since both of it isn't there it doesn't qualify as rip-off. You can't really potent EVERY model of the shoe and it's really ahrd anyway, so they keep doing it. 90% of buyers don't even know what Zara rip off, company just do it to look "fashionable" since they sell all the stuff that's in this season like >>11918917
and >>11918860

I bought some af1 clones from Pull&bear and they are actually pretty nice

File: ann-demeulemeester-high-sneakers-1.jpg (49KB, 620x413px)

49KB, 620x413px

>>11918934
K

>>11917558
>>11918065
They do look great, the quality is probably terrible though.

>>11918957
They do look great only in pictures.
I have a feeling every mall-brand produces one item of each that is higher in quality just for the pictures.

>>11918931
>>11918934

More like a weird KVA x Ann D hybrid.

>>11918961
This. They are full plastic shoes btw

>>11918947
>it has straps so it's ann d
fuck the fully strapped sneakers aren't even prominent part of Ann Ds designs, literally that one sneaker she did. None of the details or even the silhouette is similar, it's literally just velcro straps, might as well have posted any velcro hi top
If anything it's obvious Nike Vandal/Raf rip-off, sole is taken straight from vandals and the model is similar in height to those, not as exaggerated as Ann Ds

>>11918592
Fucking kek

>>11917558
>>11918911
I thought it was a Fear Of God ripoff

File: Screenshot_2016-10-29-16-22-34.jpg (1MB, 1440x1455px)

1MB, 1440x1455px

What are these based on? Should I cop?

File: CuacDfiXgAAAp6T[1].jpg (147KB, 1200x1094px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 1200x1094px

this is urban outfitters but still

File: flat,1000x1000,075,f.jpg (143KB, 750x1000px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 750x1000px

>>11916013
>zara
>literally killing sweatshop workers
>people actually support this shit and look even shitter in it

>>11918911
Tom Ford hightops

>>11919384
this made me cringe

>>11919415
most zara products are manufactured in europe senpai

>>11919662
how can you be this much in denial?
have you ever read the tags on any of their shit?

>>11919682
only the low-cost basics are produced in asia, anything more fashionable is produced in spain/portugal/turkey as far as I know

there's plenty of articles about their business model out there.. educate yourself famalam

>>11916013
Wtf they look like gats with a tech runner sole

>>11918592
And victims buy the slp one

>>11919384
>Yoshi city nights 2002
Stupid thing to put on a shirt but sounds like the comfiest thing ever

>>11919765
It's a reference to one of Yung Lean's songs. I heard they took it down when confronted about it.

>>11918957
>>11918961
>>11918973

Just how awful are they compared to say $20 UNIQLO canvas sneakers?

I got a pair when they were half price and wear them almost daily as a beater. They have survived remarkably well.

Would I get similar mileage out of these Zara shoes?

>>11919949
Very bad. UQ's shoes are good because they are very simple in both design and fabrics. Zara wants to copy higher end fashion shoes with a special design to them which alone require higher end fabrics. So they are shit because Zara only wants to replicate the look, not the quality.

>>11920024
there's no special design/fabric requirements to some of their stuff, even if it is copying higher end pieces

like pic related >>11916055 & >>11916061

>>11920045
Good leather would be a first and expensive good requirement. I don't wear Acnes and CPs but leather they use is pretty good. Zara's look like fucking plastic shoes (and they probablyare).

>>11920061
nah it's leather

obviously not good leather for 30 euro though

>>11920077
Would you wear cheap leather jacket? Obviously not. So why should you wear really cheap mall-tier leather shoes.

>>11920077
>>11920045

The way leather ages on CPs makes themlook better with age and really easy to clean

The way leather ages on cheap shoes (or hell even some £140 Nikes that I bought when I had no taste) makes them look horrifically bad and it stains permanently.

>>11916013
> bought a bunch of Zara shit at a sale before I started browsing /fa/
> now I look into my closet and see wasted money

>>11919688
Materials and fabric can come from Bangladesh and finished in Europe for all they care and it still qualifies for the tag.

>>11920093
can confirm that CPs age beautifully but the leather is prone to scratches, but on the other hand, scratches and scuffs give the shoe some caracter.

>>11920045

I'm suprised that the white pair picture has sewn on sole, but the blue one doesn't and that's the majority. The sole will start to disconnect from the leather, probably after first few wears, and look terrible. Then, there is the leather itself. It's a cheap, disgusting leather that was thinly painted, and will look like vomit once the paint begins to crack, likely at the bending point.

Invest in your shoes. Those will be unwearable after a year due to their rather clean look that you won't be able to maintain. I have Achilles Lows that I bought 6 years ago, don't care about them that much anymore, but when given a nice cleaning, they look completely fresh. Don't get me wrong, I'm not some cocky fag, but Zara and alike brands CAN'T put out a good shoe. I've got New Balances, probably 3 years old, and they are holding perfectly well, sole is glued on extremely well, and the leather is fine even after a lot of abuse, and note that it's suede.

>>11919323
Tech runners with uppers that look like german army trainers

I've never had a problem with their shirts, but I will NEVER buy shoes from them again.

I had 2 bad experiences with them -- mainly cutting my heels -- and don't trust them.

File: B89283B9-2FE9-41CA-962C-DC47B3737E4D-2351-000001ED67F05EC4_tmp.jpg (205KB, 1000x1333px)

205KB, 1000x1333px

>>11918911
Mastodon Sneakers imo

>>11916063
No, it should be people like you that get worked up over the most banal shit.

File: image.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>11920137
>looks over at my Zara shoes in shame
:(

>>11921147
Holy fuck they look so cheap. Reminds me of $12 "knits" I copped at walmart a couple years ago when I was a poorfag at Uni.

>>11921147

The hyperdunks are good at least

>>11921147
people itt will unironically defend this
>i-i-its not that b-bad guys
>good for the price amirite

>>11916013
these actually look nice

I know that they're ro rip offs but they're still clean