Commence arguing!

The low top PF's and converses look perfectly fine. The high top PF's look like if they tried to make Ronald McDonald a public figure for teenage children in a war against drug use amongst adolescents. The high top converses look like something a girl who shops at hot topic would wear.

>>11895588
What is there to argue? When has it become acceptable to buy shoes trying to imitate other shoes who aren't even expensive?

On another note, what makes a cdg heart on a pair of high top converse shoes make it more wearable than a regular pair of converse high tops?

File: PF-FLYERS-MADE-IN-USE-CENTRE-HI-WHITE-3-700x468[1].jpg (45KB, 700x468px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 700x468px

I just recently got a pair of flyers, can confirm that converse is a joke brand with absolutely zero quality going for it.

Even if you spend the extra money on the 70s, they're nowhere near as comfortable and well built as the flyers, let alone the Made in the USA line of flyers.

>>11895588
None of them.

>>11895588
I can't tell if this whole of flyers thing is a meme or not, but I think they look sportier than converse and I like that

>>11898350
This

>>11898350
that's why Cons II exists for quite some time now, Nike made them 100% betetr than the originals, they have the lunarlon sole, which in comfyness is a close second to the boost

PF Flyers will always look like ass no matter that they're Made in USA

File: 1461215823294.jpg (148KB, 1280x533px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 1280x533px

>>11900758
>that's why Cons II exists for quite some time now
>PF flyers will always look like ass
you got me good

>>11897131
People know its more expensive
>thats it

>>11902991
>you got me good
you played yourself buddy