are skinny jeans out for men? I fucking hate baggy jeans and

>>11678931

i dont get it. the ones in your pic are fine.

what is considered baggy and skinny to you?

tight jeans are out but the ones in your pic are not tight

File: 1470478796508.jpg (536KB, 785x1197px) Image search: [Google]

536KB, 785x1197px

>>11678954
those are skinny jeans. These are baggy.

>>11678931
wear slim fitting trousers instead. unless you like wearing skinny jeans, do whatever you want.

>>11678931
Super skinny (i.e. Leggings) are done

Skinny jeans though (apc petit standard, acne max) are fine and Pretty much timeless

>>11678978
RIP spray on jeans
the sperm count will be rising internationally

>>11678965
oh...dear god. no OP

>>11678965
nah, those aren't baggy. relaxed, maybe. i consider baggy to be more like ill-fitted. those are quite obviously fitted around the waist with a taper.

File: JNCO_FW_2016.png (730KB, 900x616px) Image search: [Google]

730KB, 900x616px

>>11679001

low rise pants (a leftover from the early 2000s) are now completely out. since very few companies produce tight high waisted pants for men, that means there will inevitably be a return to slightly more relaxed pants. not necessarily "loose" or "baggy" though.

>>11678931
>are skinny jeans out for men?
where what the fuck you want, you trend-hopping fuck. jesus develop your own style

>>11679005
yeah, that's what i'm talking about
you can tell those pants would fall right down without a belt

>>11679023
>reading comprehension

>>11679023
>'where' what the fuck you want

hahahahahaha calm down bud, just slowww down and read that again

>>11678931
>>11678965
>>11679005
what am i if i love all of these fits unironically?

>>11678931
w2c boots

>>11678931
im female and i think skinny jeans are fine of guys theyre just basic af on girls

>>11679005
yo this is lit af
pure fucking fuego