chelsea boots

What is it about chelsea boots that you enjoy in comparison to other boot styles?

I enjoy laces too much I think.

>>11650177
I enjoy the seamless transition from jean to shoe. Like, while wearing black jeans, and black chelseas, its sort of a satisfying seamless transition from jean to shoe.

I also just like the look in general. I've never bought a shoe without laces, but id like to give it a shot. i've been looking for an all black boot/shoe for a while that would be an outfit staple for my fits.

File: VIANELLO_91_RG.jpg (176KB, 1481x1481px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 1481x1481px

It's ALDO, but

http://www.aldoshoes.com/us/en_US/men/boots/dress-boots/c/232/Vianello/p/45787636-91#

Maybe they're worth it on discount. Also for what it's worth, ASOS worth the price at the bare minimum. I picked up a pair of their tan suede chelseas earlier this year and they're alright.

>>11650233
those look alright, im just worried about the soles lining being bulky and protruding out of the shoe making it look odd. not sure if what i said makes sense but like the sole peeking out from under the shoe kinda.

>>11650186

Definitely, I understand that.

The OP picture you posted looks nice paired with denim. Are chelsea boots professional/work appropriate as well?

File: 37572195_001_b.jpg (54KB, 975x1463px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 975x1463px

See how the toe is upturned on this shoe? When theyre on walking around or just on feet in general, does it flatten out or when youre walking does it still kind of point up slightly towards the toe?

>>11650172
Steve Madden 135 where I'm at

>>11650355
it points down when you rotate your foot upside down

File: tommy-hilfiger-magnet-quentin-boot-product-2-665624725-normal.jpg (253KB, 1137x1137px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 1137x1137px

I copped these in may for 60 euros
I'm planning to wear them in the fall and winter
What do you think of it?
(Netherlands btw)

Lol, dude don't fuck with those "fashion" brands that are gonna sell you cemented sole shit, if you want some DECENT shit, look into Jack Erwin or Meermin, I have heard QC can be iffy on Meermin but the ones my friend got are classy as shit. I'm really thinking about a pair of those or maybe a Sandro Paris pair, they have a black suede Chelsea out right now that I would totally cop if I didn't have to get more basics and essentials right now.

>>11651698
those are nice dude, the color is really unique. Are those Goodyear welted? The colors on the pull tab look like Thom Browne but they can't be at that price

>>11651705
>60 eur
>expecting gyw

>>11651514
Jesus

>>11650172

If you have COS in your country try that. Bought a nice pair there for 150 euros. Ive been impressed withghe quality for such a low price

File: images.jpg (17KB, 599x218px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 599x218px

Poorfuck here.
Are there any decent brown suede chelseas under $100?

>>11652858
COS doesn't sell Chelseas on their site..

>>11652859

You can try Benvenutti or Batta. Their prices are around 70-80 euros ;)

File: image.png (208KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 640x1136px

What's with the shinyness on the toe? That's on multiple Chelseas and I don't get it? What is that?

>>11650177
>mfw I just noticed Chealseas don't have laces

Sheeeit

>>11652908
Boy how

>>11652895
looks like the suede scratching off from getting scuffed and what. I guess it gives it a more distressed look that some people like

File: image.png (255KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 640x1136px

I'm just gonna go ahead and cop these most likely.

>>11652917
Odd

Anyone know where to cop a good light grey suede chest for ~$200?

>>11652895
I know that on my brown leather chelseas the toebox is darker than the rest of the shoe dont know why

Should I size down one size with Chelsea boots? I want a slim, not bulky size.

Why do you fucking faggots insist on getting cheap Chelseas? If you can't even afford a decent boot then what makes you think you can pull it off? Smh smd you fucking fags.

>>11653271
this

none of these even look good, the lasts are fucking awful.

>>11651711
60 € is like ten bucks, right?

>>11653271
Were you not loved as a child

>>11652859
http://www.urbanoutfitters.com/urban/catalog/productdetail.jsp?id=32251126&category=BRANDS&color=022

Am I not /fa/ for thinking that chelseas are extremely gay ?

>>11650355
i have these, they stretch out and point down more when you wear them

would it be weird to wear them to formal events? (non suede ones)

>>11650172

worn like this they always remind me of hooves.

>>11651700
Sandro is great. I've got ankle boots from them that always gets a lot of compliments

Would the black suede Chelseas work with a leather jacket or would the textures look goofy?

>>11650172
http://www.urbanoutfitters.com/urban/catalog/productdetail.jsp?id=32251126&category=M_SHOES_BOOTS&color=022

not black tho

>>11650172
good black ones

http://www.urbanoutfitters.com/urban/catalog/productdetail.jsp?id=37572195&category=M_SHOES_BOOTS&color=001

>>11654127

Cargo fag

>>11654127
sharper models with taller heels are somewhat effeminate. but I don't really care to be desu

>>11653282
what is it you dislike about the lasts? too pointy?

>>11654154
not at all, you could wear them with a suit and look perfectly fine. Probably the most versatile shoe.

>>11654000
How does that even relate?
You're a dumb fucking faggot.

>>11655429
Cause you're getting awful angry about a pair of shoes man :/ like, I don't understand all the anger, I can't put my finger on what's making you upset?

>>11654689
I feel like it'd look good, I'd have to see it tho.

>>11654773
Looked at these before, was worried about the pointed upward toe box. Not too worried anymore tho. Also worried about the coloration... I want a solid black color, and I'm afraid they'll look a little faded.

>>11650172
y would anyone ever cuff their jeans while wearing chelseas jeasus christ just disregard the entire point of the shoe senpai

>>11650233
Dont buy shit from aldo ever. Everything there falls apart instantly.

>>11655511
Not sure either, wasn't intending on wearing it like that. It is pretty odd how the models wearing it hmm

>>11655532
This is funny to imagine occurring

>>11655488
this place has high standards
people getting cheap motherfucking chelseas have no idea what theyre getting themselves into.
now if you want to get cheap chelseas, go ahead. im just trying to protect the reptuation of this board
now go ahead and buy your cheap boots and get made fun of
you deserve it you pos

>>11656216
I think you're more likely to get made fun of if you spend 800 dollars on a pair of shoes lmao

>>11652930
asos boots are of shit quality

>>11652859
Save your money Igor, do you really want cheap boots?

File: image.jpg (35KB, 514x514px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 514x514px

>>11656925
What about river island? Good LOOKIn pair of 100 dollars on there.

>>11656831
Ur super dumbe I swear to Jesus

>>11657049
Dont do this with your jeans if you buy Chelsea's please.

P.s. Chelsea boots are derived from wealth so if you're paying cheap for them you're retarded. You're also contributing to the death of SLP heroin-chic. This looks was generic a year ago but now it's for fucking zombies.

>>11657049
these look fucking awful

check aliexpress.com

File: [email protected] (9KB, 277x400px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 277x400px

been thinking about copping these for awhile, they're 85€ should i?

>>11655598
I've bought a couple of shoes from there and the soles ripped out of each pair in a month or two

File: 26116952_A-350x435.jpg (9KB, 350x435px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 350x435px

got these clarks new for $100, did i fuck up?

>>11656831
>being this poor

>>11657901
W2C

>>11658788
zalando

File: bKJ6P6G.jpg (531KB, 5000x5000px) Image search: [Google]

531KB, 5000x5000px

>>11650172
>>11650233
>>11650355
>>11651698
>>11652895
>>11652930
>>11657049
>>11657901
>>11658125

holy shit lmao at anybody who buys any of these.

is there anything more horrendous than cheap chelsea boots?

http://www.6pm.com/calvin-klein-clarke

I got these for $50 for everyday use at a job (that really shouldn't require anything remotely formal but whatever). They're a little narrow in a '60s way, but otherwise decent.

>>11657457
>let your denim hang over the top and ruin the silhouette of the boot
Why?

>>11659980
Post boots then

>>11654928
blunt in all the wrong places

it's pretty obvious what they were going for, but it just comes off as cheap. in every single way

>>11659980
leather is something you should NEVER cheap out on, can't believe fags here still think otherwise

>>11660128
what's a good alternative to Chelsea's then?
max budget is $200