[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Are there better sneaks under $100?

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 42
Thread images: 12

File: supra-skytop-grey-black-2[1].jpg (83KB, 570x425px) Image search: [Google]
supra-skytop-grey-black-2[1].jpg
83KB, 570x425px
Are there better sneaks under $100?
>>
>>11523942
Those are terrible, so I'm going to go ahead and say yes.
>>
>>11523942
Yes, there are so many
>>
>>11523948
>>11523950
>posts zero examples
Uh huh.
>>
>>11523954
Don't need to post examples. They're gaudy pieces of shit. Go look at zumiez or whatever if you're looking for some new, cheap shoes, fag.
>>
>supra
eject yourself from this earth please
>>
Vans (only the ones with the stripes) are good for under 100

Rohes if you are the only person on earth without a pair.

uhhhh, generally not too much unless you are willing to go up a lil more.
>>
White reebok lows fa been creaming on are 80
>>
File: ok gramp.png (884KB, 1281x695px) Image search: [Google]
ok gramp.png
884KB, 1281x695px
>>11523979
>Don't need to post examples.
Yeah, you don't know.

>>11523995
>Vans
No

>Rohes
Assume you mean Roshes, those are trainers and I'm not a goofninja nor do I wear sweatpants.

>>11523998
>White reebok lows
Don't know what you're talking about but no.
>>
File: sheesh.jpg (32KB, 650x358px) Image search: [Google]
sheesh.jpg
32KB, 650x358px
>>11524006
>likes supra but hates vans
>>
File: 1_260741_ZM[1].jpg (56KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]
1_260741_ZM[1].jpg
56KB, 1000x1000px
>>11524036
How are these comparable?

lol I knew if I posted this here I would get
>supras are terrible
>vans sk8 hi's
>nike trainers

How is it /fa/ is exactly the same even after years?
>>
>>11524053

desu some supra models are pretty clean and unoffensive. it has more to do with the stigma around supras and the people who wear them than the shoe itself imo. if you're not a streetwear fag that cant afford actual shoes, or a douchebag then go ahead, just know that they're pretty much the definition of middle school/early high school.
>>
File: 3035843-p-MULTIVIEW[1].jpg (40KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]
3035843-p-MULTIVIEW[1].jpg
40KB, 480x360px
>>11524080
>just know that they're pretty much the definition of middle school/early high school.
On that note I'm surprised someone hasn't shown up and said Converse yet.

I know how to pick out non-retarded colorways. I've never seen someone wearing Supras in school growing up but I'm sure things are different in other areas.

The thing is I would actually like to buy something else since I hear these tend to not last very long, but there's literally nothing else for affordable sneakers that are even passable.
>>
>>11524096

i mean the whole shtick of supras is that they're copying high end sneakers, only at lowend prices, and it ends up showing in the quality. you can't have the look and pricepoint you're going for and expect anything other than garbage tier quality.
>>
Reebok court vintage
Adidas sambas
Chuck 2s / 1970s
Puma suedes
Stan smiths since clearly you like meme shoes
Vans old skools/ sk8-hi
Reebok GL 3000
Nike AF1s

Also nice b8
>>
>>11524101
Well the thing is nothing about the Supras is low quality, except for the soles which tend to come apart. The fit, comfort, and material and durability of the uppers tends to all be excellent for the price. It's kind of stupid. Their newest released colorways have these new styled soles, maybe they're improved, but the colorways are way too limited.

>>11524105
>Nike AF1s
Thank you, that was the one left that hadn't been brought up yet.
>>
>>11524122
>stans
>sambas
>chuck 70
>gl 3000

Brought up more than that friendo. Supras are absolute ass are are both designed and market to suburban children and will retain that stigma until the company dies. Theyre also just ugly and overdesigned with a stupidly simple and slim sole that when attached to the grotesquely complex upper just looks so out of place
>>
File: 2581-15613[1].jpg (120KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]
2581-15613[1].jpg
120KB, 800x800px
>>11524132
All the shoes you posted are ugly though. And yes I recognize all those meme shoes. At least Skytops have the ability to look decent. There's just nothing out there. I really want somebody to prove me wrong.
>>
>>11524162
Idk dude u have the aesthetic sensibilities of a fuccboi Indian middle schooler but his budget too. Ur not gonna be satisfied by anything because you expect way too much out of sub 100 shoes.
>>
>>11524162
>all those shoes are ugly
>only skytops can look decent

See you dont want anyone to prove you wrong you've already made up your damn mind. Its an unpopular opinion but your subjective taste must just be so different from everyone elses that you just dont get it.
>>
>>11524162
Also WHAT makes supras look good. Ive told you what makes them bad give me some exact aspects about them that make them look good in any way
>>
>>11524182
Literally just post one image of a pair of sneakers that looks better than the Supras that can be had for under $100. I want to know they exist. Nobody is going to look at lollers like these and say they look better than the Supras.
>>
>>11524196
Except they are and they do. Youre the only one with an issue and if you think supras are so great the only shoe youd like better is gonna look equally like shit to anyone on this board
>>
>>11523942
there are only better ones, even Adidas sneakers are better, which tells a lot
>>
>>11524196
post one good fit with fucking supras

or not, your obviously baiting at this point
>>
File: image.jpg (91KB, 1526x694px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
91KB, 1526x694px
>>11524196
>>
>>11524284
Breh what outfit do you think a neutral grey pair of shoes isn't going to go with?
>>
File: ALALISIEN_12_RG.jpg (248KB, 1481x1481px) Image search: [Google]
ALALISIEN_12_RG.jpg
248KB, 1481x1481px
125
>>
>>11524341
is this a yeezy fake
>>
>>11524341
I forgot about Aldos. Don't they fall apart?

>>11524350
Clearly.
>>
>>11524354
idk dont own them

http://www.aldoshoes.com/us/en_US/men/shoes/sneakers/c/211/ALALISIEN/p/45443761-12
>>
>>11524162
I'd cop these, or something similar, op. Not many people have such taste as you and I, they will never understand aesthetics.
>>
>>11523979
This is what zumiez sells, yo.
>>
>>11524390
>they will never understand aesthetics

l m a o
>>
>>11524006
>Doesn't even know about the Reebok meme shoes
Nice b8 you wigger peice of shit
>>
File: 1465131765969.gif (2MB, 210x201px) Image search: [Google]
1465131765969.gif
2MB, 210x201px
OP,it's clearly that you started the threat with a bias
and anything people post is not going to change your opinion,this isn't a fucking echo chamber
>>
>>11523942

this thread
> how to look like poor / low middleclass spanish tourist visiting shitty tourist traps
>>
Anyone remember when that poster distressed a pair of Supras and made them look good?
>>
>>11523942
Erik Ellington pls go
>>
>>11525137
*Chad Muska
>>
lol all this drama over some poorfag's shitty taste in shoes. Gotta love /fa/
>>
>>11524162
If you're gonna continue being a dumbass and want similar designed sneakers with less of the stigma look up Converse Weapons, or Nike Air Force 2s, similar back paneling and overall construction, This Supra was modeled after a basketball sneaker anyway. Also you have shit taste.
Thread posts: 42
Thread images: 12


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.