What pants should I wear with these? Got them as a gift and I

>>11430644
literally anything slim

>>11430644
J O G G E R S
O
G
G
E
R
S

>>11430646
>>11430648
Please be specific, new to /fa/, do jeans work? What color would go with these?

>>11430652
DUNNO FOR THE JEANS IT DEPENDS TOO MUCH

YOU CAN TRY BLACK, HEATHER GREY, LIGHT GREY AND NAVY BLUE

i'd advise against wearing jeans with them

you want things that are almost techy athletic or streetwear

joggers, running pants, sweatpants etc

they tend to look out of place with jeans... try for yourself and see what looks like it makes sense to you

File: 3985_MSN.jpg (19KB, 438x374px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 438x374px

>>11430677
y-you don't have to shout

Thanks for the advice though :)

>>11430685
fuccboi detected

File: 97968.jpg (171KB, 570x570px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 570x570px

>>11430685
I might cop some nike tech fleece like pic related, any other brands that I should look for?

File: 1421061076-62984000.png (210KB, 750x750px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 750x750px

>>11430685
I might also get a pair of these to go with my shoes, thoughts?

>>11430726
>>11430729
MMMMH
YOU SHOULD CHECK UNIQLO'S JOGGERS
THEY ARE SIMPLE BUT V NICE

>>11430732
Cool I defiantly check them out, thanks.

>>11430732
Too short and poor quality

>>11430787
Do I really have to spend like $50 on sweatpants to be effay with these shoes?

>>11430787
"poor quality" YEAH OF COURSE, COMPARED TO SOME RICK OWENS SHIT
BUT IT'S GOOD FOR THE PRICE MAN

>>11430790
>>11430796
They are really short unless your a manlet

>>11430818
THE CROPPED AESTHETIC IS NICE IMO

>>11430796
No, they are poor quality. I quite like uniqlo in general as I think their stuff is decent for the money. Those joggers they have are poor quality compared to the rest of their stuff.

>>11430834
IDK MAN I HAVE TRIED THEM THEY ARE GOOD I THINK
BUT IDK THE PRODUCTS MAY DIFFER FROM ONE TO ANOTHER

joggers with roshes
have i time traveled back to 2009

>>11430841
Pls stop shouting

>>11430729
>mixing nike and adidas
GOOD GOD MAN WHY

>>11430846
roshes were were "in" in 2009? wew

I thought it was like a 2011-2012 thing

>>11430729
yeah looks good

>>11431020
>not mixing nike and adidas
boring ass brand slave