Are t-shirts as "outerwear" for children?

>>11389063
No and prep is for fags

>>11389063
Yes

>>11389063
No

>>11389063
no

>>11389063
It's fine for lounging around the house, but you're you're lazy, and just want a go-to item for daily wear, you're better off just wearing a well-fitted white button-up and tucking it in. It's ironic when people say that such a thing is too basic, but they won't think twice about wearing a solid tee that doesn't even flatter the body.

The ideal "lazy" dress code is a button up and a casual blazer--all fitted of course. People think they're going to crack some kind of magical code and find something more /fa/ and less "basic", but then they just end up wearing tees anyway. It's just denial and snobbery to think you're too good for a collared shirt and a blazer.

>>11389351
Jesus Christ please don't casually wear a blazer, I'm asking you for your own good.

>>11389356
Literally no one looks bad in an unstructured cotton or linen blazer. You just think it will look like shit because the last blazer you worse was the one your mom bought you for a middle school dance that will two sizes too big and not tailored.

>>11389351
The only reason a tee shirt wouldn't flatter your body is if you had a shit body and your shirt was too big or small.

>>11389367
Tees only look good on good bodies, not simply "not shit" bodies. And in that sense they don't look good at all since you are basically just looking at the body as it is with a thin glaze on top.

>>11389375
lmao dude

>>11389391
Are you suggesting I'm wrong? You only look good in a tee if you'd still look good with no shirt on at all.

File: Screen Shot 2016-06-10 at 2.46.39 PM.png (405KB, 335x708px) Image search: [Google]

405KB, 335x708px

>>11389351
>This is my "running to Target for some juice boxes outfit."

>>11389394
Yeah, if you don't look good without a shirt on that's what a shit body is.

File: casualuntuckedpic-e1445982287818.jpg (92KB, 612x500px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 612x500px

>>11389426
You realize you can take a blazer off, right?

Also
>double breasted

>>11389436
That pic makes no sense, that shirt is made to not be tucked in so why was he wearing a blazer with it only to take it off and lug it around

>>11389437
You can wear a lapel jacket without tucking in a shirt provided the shirt into TOO long. They make casual, unstructured, sports coats for that reason--wearing a linen blazer in hot weather is an example of a time you can easily pull this off. Though I do think it tends to look better when you tuck in a shirt.

>>11389436
>He brings a blazer just to carry it on his shoulder to go down to the corner store and buy some popsicles
Holy shit dude

>>11389394
Are you suggesting I'm wrong?
>Are you suggesting I'm wrong?

>>11389394
you'll still look average at best in most clothes

>>11389443
Why are you so drrssed up?

>>11389351
hey reviewbrah, how's it going my man

>>11389446
what kind of a life do you lead? are you from the 50s? get a weekly delivery of organic groceries and high-welfare meat and join the 21st century

Jesus christ that faggot itt

>>11389480
Can't be reviewbrah because his suits are like 5 times bigger than they're supposed to be

>>11389351
Yeah it's way to fucking hot here for a button up and a blazer, I think I'll stick to a comfy tshirt and joggers/shorts in the summer

I don't think I've ever tucked my shirts in for casual wear

>>11389624
Forget the jacket. It's too hot for a linen shirt with the sleeves rolled up? Where do you live, Mercury?

>>11389652
Straya m8

>>11389063
No, polos are.

>>11389652
SoCal

>autism the thread