Alpha industries bomber jackets. Do you guys rate them? Do you

File: 38914842_009_e.jpg (59KB, 688x1032px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 688x1032px

>>11346187

File: 38914842_009_f.jpg (80KB, 688x1032px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 688x1032px

>>11346187
>>11346188

File: b64ee56c630edfd65fa1d391febfbbea.jpg (83KB, 533x800px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 533x800px

>>11346187
>>11346188
>>11346192

Their more plain ones are nice too.

>>11346187
I find (if you're a small person) you can kinda end up looking like a marshmallow man.

imo the slim one has the perfect cut man

>>11346243
>>11346246

I can definitely imagine a loose bomber not being a good look for a shorter dude. And good to hear that the slimline version is sick, I kind of like the puff to these ones though.

Anyone else?

They're literally the worst piece of fashion since the piano neck tie.

Is the uniform of the neo-nazi in the United States

File: c54afd6e63324d33371fb68dcbc450ef.jpg (95KB, 736x979px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 736x979px

The plain slim ones (MA-1 TT) are pretty much GOAT bombers if you don't want/need to pay for a designer jacket.

>>11346425

I'm not really after a slim look though, I think a bomber is made to be a little puffy, does anyone agree?

>>11346441
sure thing

>>11346441
yeah slim fit bombers are basically against the whole point of them

>>11346425
you cowards wont even oversized bomber