At what age did you grow out of Chucks?

>>11250661
chucks are timeless

i bet you're 19 years old and SOOOOO mature

you fucking faggot

>>11250667
not OP here but i'm 19yo and chucks are fucking disgusting and impractical as hell

kill yourself if you wear them,you look like a rock band member from early 2000s faggot

>still checking everyday for a restock of the cdg play chucks

>>11251089
i'm also 19 and fully agree. fucking disgusting

I wear them because it's comfy

>>11250661
23. maybe the full white ones are ok. the rest are not.

Chuck's truly are timeless and will still be relevant for many more years

>>11251089
>impractical

They are pretty much like every other shoe. Plus cheap and comfy.

It werks

>>11251089
>>11251094

muh edgy teeny years

>>11250661
Probably around 15-16. I honestly think they are the most uncomfortable shoe I've ever worn.

They look alright I guess. I wore them more when I was really young (like there is a picture of me somewhere with Chucks on while I'm carrying my Charizard lunchbox).

>>11251118
>cheap

No they are not when you can buy roshe,superstar,stan smiths or any other effay meme shoe

If you wear these just kill yourself because you look like a virgin

>>11250661

i was never really into chucks. owned one grey pair when i was 16 and never again since then

full blacks work out. full leather whtes work out.

everything else really doesnt desu

>>11251150
theres some 70s style chucks coming out that look pretty good imo

>>11251091
>not being a size 8
lel

File: MerdocAteam.jpg (347KB, 842x1280px) Image search: [Google]

347KB, 842x1280px

Chucks are older than you and your parents, /fa/lettes.

>>11251150
>buying and wearing something because its a meme

Then just buy Vans and shut up.

>>11251311
so are monacles. The actual functional design is just too shit these days compared to other cheap shoes. They're not durable and they're definitely not comfortable.

>>11252358
>buying shoes for comfort

you are about as effay as dirt

File: 1458896739902.jpg (110KB, 1024x575px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 1024x575px

>>11251295
>having dwarf feet

File: 1461254774064s.jpg (7KB, 250x201px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 250x201px

>>11252367
>He doesn't follow the holy trinity of form, fit, function

>>11250661
Never started. I'm not into foot binding.

Never wore them. Ugly, cheap, and zero foot support

>>11250667
>chucks are timeless

yeah timelessly shit

I kind of liked the silhouette of them at first but after a month I've decided I need something that won't destroy my feet

>>11250661
14-15

>>11252371
>implying shoes are designed for clowns

Fucking clown shoes. Absolutely disgusting

>>11250661
I never wore Chucks

>>11252358

They have pretty good support when it comes to hi tops.

>>11250661
12 - 13
I realized mostly stacies wore them and they didn't look very good, kinda feminine.

>>11250661
Chucks are great. I don't know what you faggots are complaining about. Remember, if you make more then 20k yearly, you are not /fa/ and should leave.

>>11250661
i like them

I have white ones I wear in the gym they're fine for that

>>11250661
>not being able to enjoy a constant homage to a time of youth, spontaneity, and classic inoffensive styles

>>11250661
Lmao at all the 19 year Olds who think they're too cool for cuck Taylor's. There's ways to make them look good as fuck everyone just remembers them as those autistic shoes that the goth kids and weebs would wear cause they're fresh out of high school.

hate the regular chuck taylors, the 1970s pairs are great though IMO