if someone can find these exact reeboks hubert wears in la haine,

ffs never gonna get these god damn reeboks

>>11229447
kendrick lamar x rbk ventilator

>>11230090
Yeah, la haine came out in 1995, but if you look up any interviews regarding Kendrick's Reebok's, maybe it'll give an inclination.

>>11232138
>Kendrick's Reebok's
why would that help?

someone just link me the ones from la haine and take my 15 bucks

they look somehow fake

>>11233829
im worried that might be the case after looking for so long yielding no results

going to email the stylist for the film soon

>>11233840
When I first saw the movie in 2010 i asked myself if those shoes were fake and if it was just a srylistic device of the producer to portrait Huberts poorness. I think it would be the best,like you already said, to ask someone who worked for the film. Good luck

>>11229447
Jesus christ why is this so important to you

>>11233994
just looking at them they are one of the best shoes ive ever seen...
flashy yet simple
edgy yet held back
just fucking classic looking man you wouldnt get it

>>11234107
post more sshots. I haven't seen la haine in years. i remember being impressed with a lot of the fits but don't recall the sneakers standing out much

File: image.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>11234115
cant screenshot rn but check it here

File: image.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

another shot

i'm lookin man trust me

closest thing you're probs gonna find is the RB1920

>>11229447
A black 482 80?

>>11234314
yeah soyays wont cut it though need these ones

>>11234329
i dont know what that is... googled it and nothing comes up. pic?

File: images.jpg (8KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 225x225px

>>11234481

they look like black AR0586's

https://sneakerdistrict.nl/shop/reebok/classic-leather-x-kendrick-lamar

>>11234566
http://www.reebok.com/us/classic_leather

File: image.jpg (9KB, 280x162px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 280x162px

>>11229447
Judging by the sole they are a collab/design on the NPC II

>>11234551
pretty close but still not right. no line in the sole
>>11234566
nope

>>11234989
I think they're womens shoes.

>>11235137
i dont think so

>>11229447
From what I've found, they were sold by reebok as a 'Casual Shoe' without a specific model name. Reebok has done a number of styles under this title and they generally get lost in history

>>11237205
interesting.. can you link sources about that?

>>11237446
I emailed the fellow who runs the website retrobok.com

He told me just what I told you, they also have a archive of shoes (with pictures) of their catalog from the 60's-90's

>>11237481
ive been messaging on instagram but he didnt tell me that.....

can you send the catalog?

>>11237514
https://retrobok.com/reebok-shoe-archives/

>>11237530
oh yeah i checked that couldnt find it in there...

damn gotta email the stylist