[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Another Stan Smith Thread?

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 22
Thread images: 7

File: IMG_0004.jpg (116KB, 637x960px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0004.jpg
116KB, 637x960px
I had some Stan Smiths last year and sold them because I fucked up and got the green ones, and because the leather was ugly. If I had worn them for a long time would the leather eventually start looking like the absurdly overpriced but good looking RS x Stan Smith in Aged Leather? Can someone post some pics of their beaten up Stans?
>>
File: IMG_0270.jpg (913KB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0270.jpg
913KB, 3264x2448px
>>11180956

Considering the triple whites but the leather just looks like plastic
>>
modern life is absurd
>>
File: image.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
1MB, 3264x2448px
i like them
>>
>>11180982
two years of daily wear btw
>>
raf stans are literally the exact same quality as the $100 "premium" ones you can get off adidas website
the only difference is there's a trendy designer's name attached
>>
>>11180986
True, though I wouldn't exactly call Raf "trendy." His renown isn't exactly a flash-in-the-pan.
>>
>>11180956
w2c pants?
>>
>>11180986
Link the $100 ones, I've got both rafs and some of the "premium" ones. Leather is completely different.
>>
>>11182020
Agreed 100%. RAF leather is truely nicer than premium Stan's. Only pair of Adidas Stand that are as nice are the Made In Germany Stan Smith. That leather is amazing.
>>
>>11180986

Indeed, but I'm talking exclusively about the aged leather ones, the other Raf Stans are hideous
>>
File: 8.gif (324KB, 400x270px) Image search: [Google]
8.gif
324KB, 400x270px
>2016
>still buying Stans
oh fucking hell
>>
File: image.jpg (2MB, 2907x2907px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
2MB, 2907x2907px
>>11182371
They're nice.

Not 400€ nice. Don't listen to anyone arguing otherwise. In hindsight I would've gone with something else considering I wore these once

With everything adiraf related

Get them on sale. You'll feel ripped off when purchasing retail.
>>
>>11180956
No, regular Stan Smiths age horribly.
>>
If you want Raf quality, the closest 'standard' Stan Smith is the style code: D67361. The leather is really supple, they have a nubuck heel tab and they wear in amazingly.
>>
Which colour should i get my Stan Smith Originals in?
>>
>>11182028
I haven't been lucky enough to get those yet, they look very nice from what I can tell.
>>
File: stanny-s.png (169KB, 400x456px) Image search: [Google]
stanny-s.png
169KB, 400x456px
is this /fa/, /fa/?
>>
>>11182028
and yet those are still worse than the rafs
>>
File: stansmith_gum_00.jpg (175KB, 972x646px) Image search: [Google]
stansmith_gum_00.jpg
175KB, 972x646px
these r nice
>>
>>11183892
The sole is fucking ugly. Reminds me of cola candy or something.
>>
>>11183892
Just copped them, I like the color of the soles, but the material isn't gum, its just some shitty rubber you'll find on any dollar store shoe.

Still like em over all
Thread posts: 22
Thread images: 7


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.