[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Thought on these new Chuck Taylors?

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 17
Thread images: 5

File: 551528C_standard.jpg (277KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]
551528C_standard.jpg
277KB, 1000x1000px
>>
Goddamn, that'd pretty cool
>>
File: M9160_standard.png (645KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]
M9160_standard.png
645KB, 1000x1000px
meh. the existing ones are fine. they had the the "more worn out the better" and the "rebel but still normie shoe" vibe to them so picrelated is superior and will never really go out of style and need replacing with a newer model.
>>
>>11178758
these would have been hot 3-4 years ago but atp this look feels passe
>>
File: chuck.png (600KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]
chuck.png
600KB, 1000x1000px
GOAT
>>
File: 551528C_shot4.jpg (135KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]
551528C_shot4.jpg
135KB, 1000x1000px
>>
File: 551528C_shot5.jpg (159KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]
551528C_shot5.jpg
159KB, 1000x1000px
>>
>>11178880
looks cool
>>
http://www.converse.com/us/en/regular/chuck-taylor-all-star-shroud/ID00185.html
>>
Meh, zip in the middle is pretty ugly imo
>>
Cool but none of you cucks could pull em off
>>
>>11178885
Das rayciss.
>>
>>11178898
This is true, I can never pull chucks off after I put them on
>>
>>11178758
Looks like converse in a cyberpunk world
>>
Converse is really stepping up their game lately, I'm almost compelled to buy some of the newer models and I used to be completely against chucks because they looked like shit and have the normie stigma.
But hell, the 2.0 models got rid of almost all the flaws and most of the tacky shit and this new one isn't bad either, kinda looks like Rick Owens had a shitty week, but that's more of a praise for this brand.
>>
>>11178758
Holy shit, that actually looks really nice and I've never been into converse. Might check it out for myself.
>>
>>11178898
Probably not because that's a woman's shoe.
Thread posts: 17
Thread images: 5


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.