Which is perceived as a higher end brand? Should I buy either of them?

>>11158441
Polo, the croc is for middle class niglets

>>11158441
While Lacoste is higher end, both brands are very common BUT they can make some decent outfits if paired correctly. Only buy these brands if they're on sale. If you're going to pay full retail then buy some legit high end designer brands on farfetch or something.

>>11158445
/thread

File: lo-lifes3.jpg (91KB, 650x431px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 650x431px

>>11158441
yeah ralph lauren is well high end

>>11158445
True desu i only see lacoste on black kids being raised by there grandma

>>11158441
Neither.
By buying shirts with logos of well-known brands on them, you open yourself up to being instantly judged by people who have an opinion on that brand or its wearers.

This isn't necessarily bad depending on what you're going for but I don't think I've ever met someone who thought PRL (though I don't know about the other lines) or Lacoste was cool. And neither communicate wealth or high status if you're going for that dumb shit.

Get vineyard vines for the cure whale

>>11158441
Neither.
Go buy some polos at banana republic. Way better than that French nigger shit and the polo nigger shit.

>>11158441
They're both for losers. Get unbranded Polos from Lands End or J. Press, make sure they fit perfectly and never tell anyone where you got them .

>>11158498
What's with this "unbranded" meme? There's literally no point to buying retarded expensive shit if no one knows where you got it from

>>11158508
The greatest bait.

Lacoste definitely

>>11158441
I like to wear a polo when I work out, cardio bunnies really dig it

File: poop.jpg (53KB, 544x235px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 544x235px

>>11158663
Pajeet pls

lacoste would be the higher brand but polo is the choice to make

>>11158498
You can buy last season PRL and Hilfiger basics for dirt cheap from outlets tho, and the quality isn't too bad. If you care about the branding that much you're just as bad as the tards who buy them as a sign of "wealth."

>>11158441
neither

both are awful normiebrands

>>11158663
God, i can smell the curry

>>11159972
It's not about the price. I don't wear logos like that because as a rule of thumb k prefer clothing not to be legible. There shouldn't be some logo you need to zoom in on to solidify your opinion of a fit.

File: image.jpg (79KB, 584x960px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 584x960px

>tfw you will never look this good with ugly polo shirts

File: image.jpg (109KB, 584x960px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 584x960px

>>11160381

>>11160393
what a lovely boy