ITT: Brands/Clothing that never goes out of Fashion

>>11108872
thought the left was a black guy with shaved legs for a minute. No socks still looks really dumb though.

>>11108872
true. chucks will always be there.

some adiddas as well.

nothing screams man child like someone over 25 wearing converse

>>11108872
You mean: brands that arent even classified as fashion.

>>11108914
This.

I had an ex girlfriend in high school who always rotated between 6 of the rattiest chucks. I've never seen an outfit that looks good with chucks, the only thing that comes close are pf flyers.

File: 1317186692788.png (68KB, 204x190px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 204x190px

>>11108914
you're too old for /fa/ at 25 anyway. you no longer look good.

>>11108985
ur highschool ex girlfriend was a 25+ yr old man??

>>11108985
>>11109163
>rekd

>>11108872
Yo where can I get a pair of jeans with this color??

Chucks are ironically for types who brag about not buying expensive sneakers and are smug about it. Not getting the fact that Nike is bagging their money and has owned converse for a decade

>>11110229
why does it matter who gets the money? they still pay the same amount...

>>11109001
nick wooster proves you wrong, also 25 year old here.

>>11110229
>he doesnt thrift his shoes
paid $7 for a pair of like new chucks i dont even care. they are my beaters.

>>11109001
Jokes on you, I never looked good