Thoughts?

if ur white and u do this lmao

>>11084121
I'm white, with the same length hair, and similar beard.
It's from the show Vikings

>>11084120
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FW776sMVJU

this dude has that hairstyle and hair color it looks bad if you arent an alpha male viking.

>>11084131
I'm 6'3,
13.7 stone
And have a beard.
I'm not a scrawny as dweeb

I do this desu

I'm black and have thick natty dreadlocks. Also I keep my face clean shaved

>>11084131
holy shit is this a surrealism?

>>11084120 "Vikings" is made by Jews, and is a remake, the original had Tony Curtis [Jew]. This spork is an Australian underwear model. MGM is mocking Norse pre-history. And it's mostly about how superior Jesusitidy is.

>>11085755
The locations they are using in the show kind of pisses me off because they don't look anything like the real ones

>>11085796
True that. They filmed in Ireland with some CGI added. But to be fair, if they filmed in Scania where they are supposed to be living it would be boring as shit. Take Uppsala temple for instance which looked pretty cool with the waterfall etc in the series but would've been boring as shit if they used the real life location. I'm a Scandi and have been to all those locations several times.

>>11085801
Yeah. I just think it's a shame that American media has to take every single culture not influenced by christianity and either make them into a generic video game faction, or some kind of weird barbaric culture that people take as real when in truth it's about 80% the writer's imagination

>>11085755
>>11085815
Almost every surviving source about Vikings is either a Christian or, less commonly, Muslim take on it.
They had no longform written language and runes can only tell you so much.
Even saga sources on what was happening then were written through a Christianised lens.
So complaining its having any kind of religious slant put on it is kind of bullshit when literally almost all written sources except for "Gudrun raised this stone" type things did have.

Vikings plays fast and loose with history but complain about the right bits, like people being in a room together who existed 200 years either side of each other in history.

File: 4464543258_b1cf10909f_o.jpg (23KB, 469x440px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 469x440px

is the suebian knot still effay?

File: image.jpg (106KB, 540x690px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 540x690px

>>11085892
OYSTERS CLAMS AND COCKLES

>>11084121
>nordics wore it before niggers
>suddenly its not ok for a white male to wear this

fuck you

>>11085902
that is one ugly bitch

File: 717.jpg (15KB, 324x291px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 324x291px

>>11085904
>nordics wore it before niggers

>>11085904
>WE WUZ VYKINGS AN SHIET
>yo hair be raycis

im a CIS WHITE MALE (sieg heil) and i have dreadlocks. can someone, anyone, explain to me how hair can be racist?

>>11085969
what no you stupid nigger what i meant was that why cant white dudes have the same hair even if they had it before negros realized they all dont have to have afros

>>11085978
>>11085978
WE

>>11085981
is that short for whatever, fuck you and your stupid acronyms you mudface

>>11085986
WUZ

>>11085991
>WUZ
even urban fucking dictionary cant help me with this unintelligible shit

>>11085995
VIKINGS

>>11085998
kek

>>11085998
N

>>11086009
I

>>11086009
>>11086018
SHEEIT

>>11085998
>not VIKANGS

File: beispiel-dreadlocks-mit-geschlossenen-spitzen.jpg (25KB, 300x250px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 300x250px

>>11085974
Oh, you're talking about the white people with dreadlocks cultural appropriation thing.
It's not.

I've actually researched this and it's amazing to see on YouTube videos, black people commenting nice things on white people's dreadlock videos, they don't care because they see it as something to unite black and white race.

Besides, Jamaican Rastas culturally appropriated dreadlocks from Hinduism so there's that.