Underwear for the active women

>>10989414
Fucking shill

Question: why is it that every single one of these dumb startups wants to put pictures of their dumbshit founders on the front page?

Literally EVERY bad startup I know does this. I've advised some and told them to not do it, and they still do. Fucking masturbatory.

These aren't /fa/ at all. You don't need breathable, anti-bacterial shit, as if that changes anything about the way you smell. Normal thongs work just as well under leggings by the way.

>>10989427
I bet you don't even own a company. Dont be a hater!!

>>10989450
Literally cringe....
>lok @ ma bidmas

>>10989450
go away shill

I think they are pretty cool, I just pledge for a 3 pack, let's see what I get

>>10989414
Stop shilling your shit here. And maybe I'll buy some on aliexpress for $2 for degenerate purposes once your kickstarter flops and the factories that make them just keep producing them.

File: 3377841515_3d20ce5a77_o.jpg (33KB, 400x583px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 400x583px

>>10989414
Just no
Reminds me that ugly american bikinis of the 80's
Like something from Miami Vice.
Also, looks like disposable underware made by BIC.

>>10991017
french cut bikinis get my dicc hard

>>10991017
no gays allowed

File: gureito.jpg (369KB, 690x2548px) Image search: [Google]

369KB, 690x2548px

>>10989414
finally a chance to post this

>>10991017
80s bikinis were so damn good.

>>10991040
>>10991049
>>10992495
Bunch of american faggots and their granny panties fetish