this is terrible. typical "hot buff gym guy" bod is so bad. The key is to be ripped but in a way that doest look like you go to the gym everyday. Its better to look like you were in jail for a while and could only workout out core parts of the body. See tom hardy for a good bod.
There is none because everyone, believe it or not, has fucking preferences. This is something neither /fa/ or /fit/ understands. Just choose how you want your body to look through ana, lifting surgery etc.. But for fuck's sake can we stop having the god damn threads where /fa/ and /fit/ butt heads. Literally none of these posts relate to fashion.
Yes. So much this. It's fucking perfect.
One, its toned af, so without clothes it looks fucking great
Two, with clothes it works the shoulders like a boss and makes you look fit tbqfhwyf
you are delusional if you don't think tom hardy eats and works out like this guy, and maybe taking some 'vitamins' on the side to help him along since he's pushing 40.
tom only has different aesthetics solely because his genetics give him a thicker torso while this model has broader shoulders and a thinner waist
when did i ever say that? Im saying he works out differently and targets different muscles. Thats why he doesnt look like the typical gym rat with every tiny little muscle bulging out every which way. The core parts of his body are ripped and thats it
It's not perfect because it is weak.
If you mean "best looking for /fa/ styles", well that's a different story.
A man who can have his ass beaten by a woman of similar size does not have the "perfect" body.
seid and klokov have beautiful physiques but they're not effay and they're unattainable without chemical assistance. next to impossible to look effay when you're carrying that much muscle.
I will never understand why people think that this looks good. I mean, I get that it makes your back look more massive and your shoulders more wide, but Jesus Christ it looks so goddamn retarded.
Bruce Lees physique had a purpose. He wasnt going for aesthetics, which is what most people who hit the gym do. Besides, the lats didnt even make him look bad because he was more lean. Rather slim, tiny shoulders and arms. Compared to this puffer-fish >>10846620 he looked great.
Because lats/shoulders are the biggest contributor to the V-taper V-taper is the most attractive silhouette. It conveys masculinity like wide hips and narrow waist conveys femininity.
i wish i could find a picture of him standing without his dick in the shot, so this is the best i could get. but imo fassbenders body in hsame is my goal. idk how to achieve it tho
I think I had a pretty /fa/ build in 2014. My legs are too big and shoulders are too wide now.
>Bruce Lees physique had a purpose. He wasnt going for aesthetics, which is what most people who hit the gym do.
There is no reason to believe that Bruce Lee was a very good fighter.
There are plenty of elite fighters who are as muscular as that bodybuilder, and plenty who are far more muscular.
Note how David doesn't have the aggressive v taper that /fa/ jerks off to.
Greek physique usually followed a more rectangular shape. A slight V is good, but a hugefuck chest and tiny waist meme was invented by bodybuilders, who are showmen, designed to entertain.
Greeks were athletes, and were trained for war.