Are these running shoes /fa/?

You picked one of the least-/fa/ options from Nike that you could have possibly gone with

>>10732709
how so friend

what are some of the /fa/ nike models

>>10732719
Its bulky

Take a look at freeruns/flyknits

>>10732746
these are freeruns

>>10732707
Who posts a photo looking at the inside of a shoe?

>>10732707
I started out with freeruns before moving to minimalist shoes.

>>10732889
how come?

>>10732792
>>10732792
They're not the right freeruns. Freerun is a line by nike. Nike < Adidas for running shoes. Adidas has better looking shoes. The Nike flyknits are pretty cool but are overpriced "low cost" shoes. They're about 150$ for the decent free runs or flyknits. You also got the most basic and from my experience trying them on the most uncomfortable. Sure price doesn't make them more /fa/ but its like saying that just because it's designer it must be nice. Which is why women buy marc Jacobs and Michael kors. The brand isn't /fa/, it's the style. In your case you just got the gymcore freeruns.

>>10732964
apparently they are called nike freerun 5.0+

best are:
ultra boost
flyknit racer
free 3.0/4.0/5.0

>>10732707
anyone notice how the vast majority of nike shoes have steeply declined in quality.

>>10732707
The absolute only thing you should worry about with running shoes is fit and feel. Fashion should be dead last if you want to not fuck yourself up.

They're great beaters, one of my more comfy shoes before getting stolen

>>10733066
>this

File: 20151125_203138-1.jpg (3MB, 1599x3127px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1599x3127px

>>10733028
Free run 3.0 master race reporting

>>10732746
>>10732964
What the fuck are you going on about?