All Saints

Additional info:

Mostly wear Zara, some Banana, and some J Crew (only their t-shirts and 484 chinos).

All Saints seems like the next logical price point step. I like their styles and cuts, which are similar to Zara's and I'm hoping, at a higher quality level.

i think people shit on allsaints but i don't mind them. i have a dress, skirt, silk shirt, ankle boots, and wallet from them lol and they've all held up.

i'd just suggest not to pay full retail. they have a 20% student discount last time i checked. they also don't resell for a whole lot so buying second hand is very economical.

>>10717943

How's the fit? I'm 5'10, 145lbs, lean body.

I find J crews fit to be boxy and terribly "American" for lack of a better term. In their chinos, I'm a 28x32 -- they have about 2" of stretch in every pair; medium in their t-shirts; small in shirts.

Zara's stuff always fits me really well, but their sizing is all over the place. Waist size 30 usually fits me well, sometimes their size 30 is really a 33" waist. Small/medium for most cardigans, sweaters, etc.

>>10717957
I'm 6'1 150 and j crews slim shirts fit me perfectly so idk how it wouldn't fit you

>>10717957
hm, their sizing has been consistent for the most part. the skirt is size 4, shirt is XS, and i've tried on their leather jackets in size 4 and they fit well. haven't tried on their jeans in a while so i can't remember whether their sizing for bottoms was consistent.

>>10717975
They fit. Anything from factory doesn't, however. Factory sizing is all over the place and very poor.

>>10717893

I like All-Saints. Definitely overpriced, but their style and cut is on point with some pieces.

>>10718003

Sizing suggestions?
Anything to be weary of?

All Saints are one of my favourite brands, but I wasn't too stoked on the jeans I bought from them (extremely rigid, bad cut for me at least)

I mostly have shirts and outerwear and they're all up there with my favourite pieces

>>10717893
I second the people in this thread. AllSaints definitely does not deserve the hate they get on this board sometimes.

>>10718925
thanks.
any suggestions?

>>10717893
Shit quality, zara and hm tier. Everything looks like shit irl.

>>10717957
I was just in the Seattle store yesterday, I wear a small in the shirts and I'm 5'9 130

>>10719257
rad. thanks.
pant sizes?

>>10719214
Fuck off you are a living breathing meme.
Quality is pretty decent, absolutely better than h&m and zara. Definitely overpriced but I really like some of their t shirts.

>>10717893
Overpriced, def better than zara and h&m though. They have about two sales every season. Actually wearing a pair of their cigarette jeans now. I've had these for about three years now, durability is fine. They are really stretchy, which isn't really my thing but they look fine. Also have some sweaters, a jacket and a pair of boots. Jacket quality is fine, boots too. Sweaters could be better but were worth it on sale.