>tfw 5'10 with a 29 inseam is there a worse feeling?

File: enoughfrog.jpg (29KB, 316x202px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 316x202px

>>10716308
>Dreamt of being as cool as DIO
>Inreality just around POLNAREFU
fuck

>>10716308
>tfw 6'1 with 33 inseam, 30 waist and all I ever find is pants with a 28-31 inseam

>>10716319
wtf? lol its so easy to find 30 x 34 or 30 x 32. Piss easy. Its even possible to find 30 x 36

>tfw 6' and wear 30x30
>closest I ever find is 30x32

>>10717040
not in my area it isn't

fucking fattasses

>>10716308
>tfw 6'1" with a 30 inseam
Fuck my small legs

>>10717151
you should consider really high-waisted pants so your legs look longer than they are

>5'10
>28

>>10717186
Yeah I might. I'd have to wear a belt because they'd slide down otherwise.

File: bucklebackbuttonflybackdetail.jpg (149KB, 1066x1600px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 1066x1600px

>>10717203
If you don't want a belt, you could try buckle-back pants or even suspenders. I have some buckle-back pants and they're pretty good desu - RRL makes some buckle-back chinos but they're not particularly high-waisted so I'm not entirely sure why they even have that detail.

if limb lengthening was funded id get it in a heartbeat

File: 85904325_o3.jpg (183KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 800x800px

>>10717218

File: 1434627875467.jpg (83KB, 409x700px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 409x700px

What the fuck. Are all your parents from chernobyl or something. You all have stupidly short legs for your heights.

>>10716308
I'd imagine it would be 5'9 with a 28 inseam

6'4"
27" inseam

File: image04.png (170KB, 202x497px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 202x497px

>>10717295

U should swim bro

5'6 with a 29" inseam

File: 1435614489336.gif (1MB, 277x157px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 277x157px

Wow, never realized how much of a freak I am.

>5'7"
>32" inseam

File: it ok.jpg (59KB, 540x405px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 540x405px

>>10716308

>6'5"
>36" inseam

I was on the exposed ankles game long before it became trendy.

5'10" with 32" inseam

generally anyway, sometimes a 32 is abnormally short or long
why do pants measure by number at all if it's not always the same?

>>10717523
Because the manufacturers want things to fit differently for people who buy clothes by numbers - a 32 in skinny pants is not a 32 in wide pants. Same reason vanity sizing exists in waist sizes - low rise pants can be anywhere from 2-4 inches larger than the given measurement because the waist is smaller than the hips that the pants are sitting on.

It's retarded. 32 inch inseam should be 32 inch inseam, 32 inch waist should be 32 inch waist. Not 32x32 that's actually 34x30.

>>10717040

I can never find a 28x34 though

>>10717500
I know 6'+ is effay, but 6'5" sounds brutal

6'0 34" inseam. Long legs short torso feels

>>10717721
go get some slp and post fits

>>10717725
y

>>10717818
y not. Long legs and short body are slp perfect.

>>10717541
gain weight

Are you all saying your actual measured inseam or the inseam of your pants? Because I have two pairs of pants both with 32" inseam and one gets stacks while the other fits pretty straight. I tried to measure my inseam by myself and it's kinda wonky but I'm pretty sure my inseam is 31", my height being 6'1".