/Chelsea/

>>10624583
don't cop docs. save up a little you have better options.

It's a chelsea ffs, you need to be picky and wiser.

>>10624597
This

>>10624597
>>10624715
wtf are you talking about?

>>10624583
RM Williams are really good. They are TTS

File: 57fbdb28632f48e58262fa4685dbe72a.png (286KB, 1020x470px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 1020x470px

I've been debating whether to get a pair in suede or leather. the suede ones are $90 and the leather $220. I could get either but idk if the suede ones would look just as good or if I should shell out the extra cash. Thoughts?

>>10624931
no suede, goddammit

>>10624931
Sauce on left?

>>10625119
Jack Erwin Chelsea

do brown chelsea's look weird with denim?

File: 2015-11-19 00.42.35.jpg (3MB, 4160x3120px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4160x3120px

>tfw your chelseas are made of shit leather but no one can tell from standing level so you wear them anyway because the silhouette is great

>>10625404
W2c on the left

File: 2015-11-19 00.13.45.jpg (3MB, 4160x3120px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4160x3120px

>>10625411

I thrifted them. I honestly have yet to figure out who makes them. There's barely any tagging apart from a few numbers on the insides.

>>10625420
Rip my heart

>>10625404
What are the chelseas they look nice

>>10625391
as long as they are suede absolutely not, leather brown looks weird and too formal imo

>>10625738

again, thrifted.

the brand is miu miu which supposedly is the female-oriented offshoot of prada which is really fucking weird because i have size 14 mens feet (size 16 in womens) so i really doubt they're actually female boots.

>>10625743
Damn, anybody know a nice entry level nlsck leather chelsra boot i can get? I just wanna try em out to see if i like them.

>>10625775
So far just looking at asos..

>>10624583
if you want a more sleek look, get the screw on sole not the stitched sole. You want to get a set up that is /fa/ not /farm/

>>10625775
whats entry level price for u?

>>10625911
I can spend up to 200 i suppose

Tan suede or black leather?!?!

>>10626784
whats ur style?
slp? - black leather
not slp - tan suede

File: Boot.jpg (210KB, 1150x788px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 1150x788px

WHAT ARE THESE W2C NOBODY KNOWS WHERE TO GET THEM BUT THEY ARE SO GOOD

>>10626817
No idea really, I have some thrift shirts that I wear with black jeans that makes it look like an SLP inspired fit, but I wouldn't say that is my goal necessarily. I feel like the black leather would be more versatile across styles than tan suede, but I don't want $250 worth of buyers remorse...

>>10624583
If you're buying RMs (gr8 choice btw), I'd seek out a place to try them on first (bit hard if you're not in Australia though). If you're in Aus get someone in store to help, theyre really great. I went almost a full size down and I can still wear them with thick socks because the leather stretches out a bit with wear, so yeah defs try them on if you can.

File: 20151119_220002.jpg (162KB, 747x1328px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 747x1328px

r8 my chelseas

If you've got wide-ish feet then get the wide version ("w", can't remember the suffix). As >>10626867 mentioned the leather does stretch (sorry can't remember by how many sizes) I picked some slim ones, and now there's a toe poke on the side (I like it but yeah).

>>10626835
They're Saint Laurent western boots/cowboy boots

>>10626956
are those the zara chelseas?

>>10627239
Nah, Barneys from a couple years ago.

>>10624597
Can you read? These aren't docs

>>10624583
Real dope, heard great things. Certified ethically made too which is cool.
Going to pick some up myself.

>>10627160
WTF, no. Those abominations aren't Saint Laurent.