Censorship thread

>>1967732
>>1967728
>>1967725
>>1967724
>>1967712
>>1967709
>>1967704
wat why?

WHY

File: image.jpg (270KB, 900x1200px) Image search: [Google]

270KB, 900x1200px

Censorship is actually my fetish, but I like to have a little bit less left to my imagination.

>>1967764
That's a fine image you got there! I think I'll fap!

>>1967725
>>1967728
>>1967732
These three interest me...

Great, now post the originals.

>>1967979
But then that defeats the point of the thread.

>>1967981
He can post the original and the censored version just fine, no?

>>1967984
But the point of the thread is to appreciate them with the censor on. Removing the censor kills the appeal of the image in the context of this thread.

>>1967985
What kind of appeal do censors have? I can understand clothes but stupid censors?

File: imagination_by_spong3holly-d3e10xn.jpg (193KB, 900x680px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 900x680px

>>1967989
Use your pic related.

>>1967990
What, you are telling me that instead of a murlock, birds or beachballs you imagine that she has puffy dicknipples?

>>1967993
Haha, nope. Not even close.

>>1967994
Well, tell me what your imagination produced then

Comeon, surely you got an amazing imagination? I want to hear it!

>>1967999
I'm not the guy you're arguing with. But for me, it's the sense of being teased. The "so close, yet so far" aspect of it. Sort of like tight, or revealing clothing does for so many, unless you don't see the appeal in that either???

For those asking for the uncensored images, all the ones that interested me were easily obtained through the handy iqdb function right here in the thread.

>>1968023
Like I said, I see the appeal in revealing clothes. But theres a difference between hot clothes and stupid funny censors for me, and with stuff like >>1967961 she's not even nude under that so it's rather pointless.

And sure, you can get the source for japanese images but the western ones? Usually more unlikely, unless someone uploaded them on the boorus.

>>1968036
Hot clothes and stupid censors are of the same concept to me. They both tease you without showing you what's there. As for >>1967961, I didn't evne know she wasn't nude under there. The added layer of mystery to it is what makes it exciting, kind of like the Bubble threads where they cover up evidence of bikinis to make them appear nude, though I imagine you won't be a fan of those either. For people into this kind of thing, they have little or no interest in the uncensored versions, that negates the point of this kind of thread in the first place. I'll be the first to admit that yes, this is a weird as hell fetish, but eh, different strokes for different folks. I don't expect you to understand it any more than I understand peoples' foot fetishes, and that's fine.

As for the sources to the western images, Google doesn't find them either? I'm the one who posted >>1967764 and as far as I know, no uncensored version exists, that was just a progress shot of another image that was also censored in some way. I can't tell if any other images are of western origin so I hope that cleared that up.

>>1968048
Yeah not much of bubble fan either.
I don't know but when the censors are added later or are censors not fitting to the image (like patreon logos, or the "funny" ones here) then it more feels like the person wanted to troll you instead of the girl "censoring" her own lewd parts to arouse you, if you get what I mean.

As for the images, nightelf here >>1967980 for example I couldn't find. Unless I did something totally wrong.

File: image.jpg (85KB, 600x821px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 600x821px

>>1968051
Yeah I definitely get what you mean. I'm not a fan of many in this thread either, I like for the censors to cover up less, like >>1967987 does. But hey that's their thing.

I couldn't find it on Google either, so I took it to TinEye and here it is. All the power behind Google and they couldn't find it??? That honestly surprised me.
Sorry it wasn't nude!
And sorry to the others for ruining the illusion by posting this, lol

>>1968057
God I need to start using tinyeye more often. The only one I didnt try is the one that finds it, of course.

Well thanks then anyway, enjoy your censor stuff, as weird as it is.

>>1967761
If someone wants to eat their cake with a screwdriver, just let them.

>>1968070
>Someone's kink doesn't make sense to me, so instead of being open-minded or understanding I'm just going to shitpost and be ultra condescending.
Nice, I'm a fan of your work!

>>1968182
I actually really like this one.

>>1968269

Save it, it's all yours my friend

>>1967704
>>1967709
>>1967712
What is lewd shrewd