[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

3D Printing Peachy Printer Yes Edition

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 326
Thread images: 42

Old thread >>949924

>open source community
http://reprap.org/
http://forums.reprap.org/

>buyfag buyers guide
https://www.3dhubs.com/best-3d-printer-guide
Any number of Reprap kits out there

>basic 3d printing FAQs
https://opendesignengine.net/projects/vg3dp/wiki (lots of useful stuff)
http://www.reddit.com/r/3Dprinting/wiki/index

>what kind of filament do I want
http://support.3dverkstan.se/article/28-material-guide
http://www.matterhackers.com/3d-printer-filament-compare

>why do my prints look like shit, visual troubleshooting
http://support.3dverkstan.se/article/23-a-visual-ultimaker-troubleshooting-guide
http://reprap.org/wiki/Print_Troubleshooting_Pictorial_Guide

>how to calibrate
http://support.3dverkstan.se/article/30-getting-better-prints
https://www.youtube.com/user/ThomasSanladerer
http://reprap.org/wiki/Triffid_Hunter's_Calibration_Guide
http://prusaprinters.org/calculator/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_Wb0i0-Qvo [Embed] [Embed] [Embed]
>where do I get files to print?
https://www.yeggi.com/
https://www.youmagine.com/
http://www.thingiverse.com/
https://www.myminifactory.com/

>what programs do you make your own files with
http://support.3dverkstan.se/article/38-designing-for-3d-printing
http://www.openscad.org/
http://www.freecadweb.org/
https://www.blender.org/
https://www.onshape.com/
https://www.tinkercad.com/
http://www.123dapp.com/

>where to buy genuine hotends
http://www.filastruder.com/collections/e3d-hotends (USA E3D reseller)
http://e3d-online.com/ (E3Ds regular site, yuro based)
http://hotends.com/ (genuine J-Head seller)
https://www.printedsolid.com/shop/printer-parts/hexagon/ (hexagon)
https://www.b3innovations.com/ (pico)
http://www.dta-labs.com/products/prometheus-v2 (prometheus)
https://www.lulzbot.com/catalog/budaschnozzle-20 (budaschnozzle)

>where to buy filament
http://pushplastic.com/
http://www.jet-filament.com/
http://www.makergeeks.com/
http://www.reprap.cc/
>>
File: Capture.png (352KB, 1213x709px) Image search: [Google]
Capture.png
352KB, 1213x709px
Anyone have experience with this thing?
I'm thinking of getting it because I can't justify spending more on a hobby printer
>>
File: ThermistorPlug.jpg (157KB, 1111x835px) Image search: [Google]
ThermistorPlug.jpg
157KB, 1111x835px
Reposting from last thread:

So I'm needing to replace the thermistor on my hotend, and the factory one was taped on with teflon/PTFE tape. Will just any old teflon tape do? I have a bunch of the kind used for plumbing/irrigation.


Also, something I didn't think about was that the thermistor has a socket on the end of it. Do these things release somehow? I have a bunch of the metal bits, forgot what they're called, but they're pretty stuck inside there. Currently I just bent the leads of the new thermistor so they'd wrap around the (male) ports, and spring tension keeps the contact.
>>
>>963488
Go for it
Your only other choices in that price range arent any better.

Its built upon open source software which is maturing nicely, it should print fine. And you can always upgrade anything you want on it.
>>
File: 1454924619013.jpg (32KB, 425x319px) Image search: [Google]
1454924619013.jpg
32KB, 425x319px
>>963452
>Peachy Printer Yes Edition
>>
Hello, guys!
Anyone have a Da Vinci 2.0A printer?
My device is bricked when upgrade firmware via XYZware. Anione can help me?
>>
>>963531
Were you trying to upgrade to a custom firmware, or was it just the standard DaVinci software?
>>
>>963525
I still don't see the problem with a $100 printer. It seems like the perfect printer to get someone into 3D printing. They are getting parts and certification, so it should ship in a few months. That said, I am not a backer, but I do plan on buying one later this year.
>>
>>963534
Just standart software. Flashed firmware from official website.
>>
>>963537
>I still don't see the problem with a $100 printer.
After building your own enclosure for it, buying resin you are easily going to double that 100$ into 200$
It was the only printer in that price range in early 2013, not the case today.

>It seems like the perfect printer to get someone into 3D printing

Yes, of course
A weak, low resolution printer that requires very expensive proprietary resin, which has weak software is great for someone getting into 3d printing!

Sure, you wont be able to reuse the hardware or resin in any other printer when you outgrow it in a week. And since the software doesnt let you learn any real 3d printing skills, you will still be 200$ in the hole when you get a better printer with no actual skill or reusable parts.

You will essentially be a new beginner with a steep learning curve ahead of you. This hobby isnt plug and play, its all about nuances of deep printer setting tweaks.

It isnt a stepping stone, its rigged up gimmick that poses a wall for people. People really tight on cash cant just throw the money invested in the peachy to the wind and go to a new printer. Its going to be sad for them when they realize the ceiling of the printer.

After shipping and Resin costs, you will be right there paying as much as
>>963488
this or any other number of cheap chinese printers. You get a whole lot less with the peachy than a real printer.

> so it should ship in a few months.
Yeah, its continually been pushed back for over 2 years now.
Ill believe it when I see it. Tiko got its certifications and started getting parts when they realized there was supplier quality issues and had to push it back even further.
>>
>>963538
Welp, maybe send them an email and see what they have to say.
Ive heard of Ramps control board conversions, not sure how hard that would be.
>>
>>963566
>After building your own enclosure for it, buying resin you are easily going to double that 100$ into 200$
You can use a two liter bottle if you want!

>It was the only printer in that price range in early 2013, not the case today.
That doesn't mean this one is bad or better exists at this price

>>It seems like the perfect printer to get someone into 3D printing
>A weak, low resolution printer
I don't see how it is low resolution, the laser and drip system will make it very high actually.

>that requires very expensive proprietary resin,
It doesn't, you can check the forums for cheap UV activated resin.

>which has weak software is great for someone getting into 3d printing!
Weak software? What are you talking about? You will be able to use Blender models like everyone else or whatever you want.

>Sure, you wont be able to reuse the hardware or resin in any other printer when you outgrow it in a week.
I know you are exaggerating, but given the low price who cares if I can reuse parts? Not like you are going to want a mendel after playing with laser stuff. More likely you would move to laser sintering.

>And since the software doesnt let you learn any real 3d printing skills, you will still be 200$ in the hole when you get a better printer with no actual skill or reusable parts.
I don't see how given you can make your own stuff like every other printer.

>You will essentially be a new beginner with a steep learning curve ahead of you. This hobby isnt plug and play, its all about nuances of deep printer setting tweaks.
Okay, but that's again only if you plan on switching to the reprap stuff.

>It isnt a stepping stone, its rigged up gimmick that poses a wall for people. People really tight on cash cant just throw the money invested in the peachy to the wind and go to a new printer. Its going to be sad for them when they realize the ceiling of the printer.
Opinion

>After shipping and Resin costs, you will be right there paying as much as
Don't see how.
>>
>>963579
The drip system is a fucking abomination and will certainly be the first thing people actually upgrade.

And I find it funny you think that a large part of Peachy backers looking to get into 3d printing will jump into another SLA printer.
They are buying the peachy because of its price, not because its an SLA printer.

We all know how many low priced SLAs are out there...

People are going to be switching to FDM, most likely running reprap.
They dont know any better, then impulse bought this piece of garbage on kickstarter afterall.
>>
>>963582
I can't speak for everyone, but I wouldn't be buying it if it wasn't for the laser. I do want to get into SLA eventually. I figure as I learn about this the price will go down as the SLA patents expire.

I'm sure you are right and people will come up with a better drip system. I hope they do. Also I can't find what the true resolution of the peachy printer even is.
>>
Just wanted to say thanks for all the help in the last thread. Pretty set on the Robo R1+ since it seems an easy place to start and to learn a bit by tweaking it.

While I'm looking at a printer as a way to do other project rather than a project itself I am curious how possible it would be to get a kit or go from scratch and get something pretty solid. Say a 8 cubed or larger work space, heated bed, and easy or auto leveling?

Would be neat to build it, but I don't know if that route really leads to something that isn't going to require constant tweaking to not end up with a print stuck to the extruder or something.
>>
>>963701
For around the price of the Robo R1+ you are much better off buying a FlashForge or something along those lines.

Robos early on had a lot of really bad issues and their customer service was awful. And even back then you were paying a premium for a mediocre printer.
Maybe they have tweaked them now, but I doubt it.

Seriously look into the FlashForge lineup, best bang for buck in that price range
>>
>>963704
All videos I've seen of the newer models seem to be putting out pretty good quality. I've seen some of the original R1's which did seem rather crap.

And sure I would consider a flashforge if they have one with a good size build area that I can print from often without constantly resetting up the printer. Is there a particular one you would recommend?

I don't mind going in a bit more money if its good in the long run.
>>
>>963596
>>I wouldn't be buying it if it wasn't for the laser
Full diy sla user here. Your problem seems to be that you somehow associate lasers with precision.
Having looked at the pictures of peachy prints in their own galery and the prints I did with a simple topdown SLA I am convinced that the peachy printer is not worth its money even if it's not verry much.
The peachy will be verry frustrating for beginners. I have experimented with floating resin setups. They are a pain to handle pre- and postprint. For me it wouldn't be worth the hassle for such low quality prints even if I could get the printer for free.
>>
So how easy is it to keep the Creator Pro level and printing? Better off with a Dreamer?
>>
>>963731
The Creator pro is open source, the Dreamer is not.
Its a Makerbot clone, without having to give Makerbot money which is nice.
>>
>>963748
Ya it looks pretty awesome and the leveling didn't look hard either. Quality on it seems really nice.

Looks like there are few mods for it to help with filament flow/snagging and some people insert a glass panel for the bed. Not sure if that is really needed. Seems a lot people do all kinds of things for the removal of objects afterward from tape to hairspray, seems weird.
>>
>>964099
>insert a glass panel for the bed. Not sure if that is really needed

Glass is a really good print bed material. Especially more expensive Boro glass.

When it starts to wear, you just get a new piece of glass instead of having to deal with replacing the metal bed.

And yeah, glue hairspray and other stuff to get extra adhesion is sometimes needed depending on the print and material and stuff. It can be a bitch to get off, but better than the whole print popping off halfway through
>>
I've got a bunch of linear rails, lead screws and stepper motors lying around.
What's a kit that will allow me to put this stuff together with minimal hassle?
I tried just making a case out of wood, but I'm shit at woodworking and I don't have any of the tools to make it easier.
>>
>>964427
Use the Keyword Repstrap in your searches.
>>
>>964431
Thanks, anon.
>>
>>963524
>>963566
Not the original poster, but can I print nendoroids with it? I heard that some printer can only print "cone" shaped models, or maybe I heard wrong?
>>
Can the Makerbot 3D print wood filament? I'm buying one and if it can't I want to know what I have to mod to have it work. Already buying a glass bed to put on it along with some M3 nuts to steady the bed.
>>
>>964625
Which makerbot Model?

A replicator 2 will.
A cupcake, maybe
A 5th gen won't even print the stuff it was designed for
>>
>>964613
No clue what you are talking about cone shaped prints.

It will print whatever file you throw at it, but the problem is what kind of quality it will print at. We have no clue how high the ceiling for print quality will be in the final shipped printer kits.

With that said, SLA printers are good for figurines because of the inherent way it prints, you can print a stretched out arm fine. With an fdm printer there is only so much overhang before you need to support it with extra material
>>
>>964631
Meant this one.

Monoprice Maker Select 3D Printer https://www.amazon.com/dp/B018GZBC3Y/ref=cm_sw_r_other_awd_DqU7wbZ9QP2SQ

Could this print wood filament?
>>
>>964753
It should be able to.
>>
>>964765
Thanks senpai.
>>
Anyone know a good guide to learning how to design in 3D?

I did okay with Sketchup, but I'm looking to swap over to Autodesk or maybe Blender and want to take it beyond just making simple cubish designs.
>>
>>964853
learn solidworks and never look back
>>
>>964853
3ds Max is pretty good. Lots of tutorials to it as well.
>>
>>964865
I got a student license when I was going to school for it and there's a lot of online books for it too you can torrent. Zbrush is fucking awesome too if you can get over the learning curve. What my teacher showed me was making basic low poly models in 3ds Max then exporting it to Zbrush and doing finer details there.
>>
>>964855
>learn solidworks and never look back

This. Oh god this. Solidworks makes every other 3d app I've ever used. It is amazing, and a saleable market skill.
>>
Is there really any difference between manufactures for filament or can I just buy it from anyone and expect the same quality? I'm not talking about buying a spool from some random chinese dude on ebay, but like the sellers in the OP. Is there really a difference between someone selling a $30 spool vs a $22 spool?
>>
>>965092
not really

as far as PLA goes hatchbox makes the best quality for the price, by far. i can only speak for PLA because i don't print in ABS, but i would assume it would be the same for that too

for other filaments like ninjaflex or wood fill, no idea, but hatchbox sells those as well and they're all highly rated
>>
>>965092
Its one of those weird situations.
Filament is a basic thing to make.

Quality control with chinese filament is very hit and miss.
Unbranded Ebay filament can print very good, or very very bad.
This is/was especially true of 3mm filament when chinese were reusing plastic welding rod and sold it as filament. They didnt retool anything and there was wild variances in width, and contamination wasnt as important to them.

USA made stuff has always been better in terms of that, but it used to cost a large amount more.
Nowadays you can get Push and a few others for just a couple of bucks more than chinese.

But with that in mind, Hatchbox has upped the quality control of chinese filament. Maybe other brands but Hatchbox is the popular one because of their quality.

With that said, every manufacturer can send out bad filament.
I have not gotten a bad batch of Push Plastic or Hatchbox. Both are in the OP, both Prime on amazon.

I tend to spend the little extra on Push just because its USA made. I really got my printer dialed in with it because I bought some on a black friday deal. Stuff is great
>>
>>964853
Larn one of the proferisnal engeenirg software like inventor or Solidworks.
>>
Is there a real disadvantage to buying cheapo Chinese PTFE tubing? I want to replace the stuff in my current E3 head as I suspect that I am not getting a good seal.
>>
>>964853
Use OpenSCAD and never look back

I use vim to edit the files. and it has never been more convenient.
>>
>>965432
>Is there a real disadvantage to buying cheapo Chinese PTFE tubing? I want to replace the stuff in my current E3 head as I suspect that I am not getting a good seal.

I have been using it for 200+ hours because I experimented with a longer extruder so I got a good amount of it and I haven't had problems
>>
>>964690
>We have no clue how high the ceiling for print quality will be in the final shipped printer kits.

I think we can all agree that kickstarting a printer is pretty dumb. Obviously with Peachy or any other product, you generally should wait for reviews.
>>
>>965687
I've never been impressed with the quality of the very few prints they have even shown off.
I have very little faith in the whole project
>>
Right now isn't it more economical to use shapeways instead of a diy SLA ? Their extreme detail is just DLP prints IIRC. Safer too, since you won't have to be near resin particulate.
>>
Im getting a shitload of spiderwebbing between pillars. Should I turn the cooling fan back on even though most people think you should print ABS without it?
>>
>>965940
Retraction settings: tweak them.
>>
I can see the bed jerking, but when the print (which was just a bunch of diagonal lines) was finished, THERE WASNT A SINGLE DEFECT

I think Im losing my mind
>>
Is it normal to hear a bit of clicking as the head melts its way through minor warping in the last layer? I get that a lot when its doing the third layer of a raft or going over the top of infill. I thought the bed might be too high, but the models themselves look pretty damn good.
>>
>>965940
retraction and make sure your temp isn't too high if you're printing with abs
>>
>>965955
>if it ain't broke don't fix it
no but really if your prints aren't affected then what's the problem?
>>
I just had a print somehow repair itself after catastrophic failure. It was a model of a character with both its arms hanging by its side, and the supports on the right arm snapped so it was nowhere near stationary when the print head was working on it. I decided to just let it slide and see what happens, and somehow it managed to connect to the shoulder. The thing was pretty much stuck to the extruder, and somehow it managed to right itself. I think Ill start going to church.
>>
Anyone ever tried building some sort of sound dampening upgrades for an i3? This thing is in my room and I swear to christ I start hearing Motown music in the stepper motors after about four hours of printing.
>>
>>966125
Sure they have. You know those little oval-shaped pieces of metal that come with the motors? Those are dampeners.

You could also put it on rubber feet, and/or in an enclosed box.
I also remember seeing some sort of magnetic suspension thing on thingiverse.
>>
>>966128
Yeah, my chinese rice farmer-tier one didn't come with those. Rubber feet are already on, but there's still all the noise from the frame vibrating. I like the magnetic suspension idea, but my desk is filled with nothing but electronics, so I dont think I want magnets strong enough to hold up 22 pounds of cheap as shit printer anywhere near them. Ill see if Home Hardware has tiny springs and shock absorbers tomorrow.

Also, unrelated to printers, but can someone explain how Firefox can dominate the browser market and simultaneously have a spellcheck that doesn't recognize the word "Absorbers"?
>>
>>966143
http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:91720

Try these. My printer would usually turn the entire table into a vibrating speaker. Once I printed those, its pretty silent/
>>
File: image.jpg (283KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
283KB, 2048x1536px
Can somone explain to me what the fuck any of this even means?
>>
>>966195
They are trying to make standard mundane "features" that pretty much all printers have seem special
>>
>>966168
Does that affect frame stability/wobbling?
>>
>>966195
Looks like a flimsy i3.
>>
>>966486
Doesnt really look like an I3 at all, and it looks sturdy enough.
>>
>>966195
>CNC transformer module

What the fuck?
>>
>>966226
Well, depends on how sturdy your frame is. My Prusa i3 has those reinforcement braces that conect the top of the X-Z plate to one end of the Y axis and that makes the frame really sturdy. You can see the printer start visibly vibrating and jumping around like a low rider during some swift moves, but since the entire frame moves, position in relation to the bed stays unaffected.
>>
>>966195
>print reel magazine
surprisingly a lot of (cheaper) printers don't have anywhere to put the filament. Some of them can't extrude properly because of that.

>lightweight & portable
means you can't print anything other than PLA.
>CNC TRANSFORMER MODULE
I assume this is referring to how they CNC'd the heating element like everyone else.
>>
File: Striations.jpg (251KB, 1185x847px) Image search: [Google]
Striations.jpg
251KB, 1185x847px
Anyone have any idea why I'm getting such regular defects in my prints? I can't figure out why this is happening.
>>
>>966696
You're underextruding. Increase your extrusion width.
>>
>>966195
>text and indicator lines intersecting
>TEXT ACTUALLY OVER THE PRODUCT
This is triggering me, please tell me this was just because of stupid CSS or something, and those were all just placed over the image. If some "designer" actually thought this was the correct way to lable/show off a product, they should be shot repeatedly.
>>
File: image.jpg (279KB, 1536x2048px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
279KB, 1536x2048px
>>966709
Is it better rotated, anon?
>>
>>966706
But the thing is that it's a pattern. If I were underextruding consistently, wouldn't it be a thin line everywhere instead of 0.5cm thin, 0.5cm normal, etc.?

The sidewalls do look underextruded, though, I'll change the "extrusion multiplier" constant in Slic3r, since that's what I think you mean (but I may be wrong).
>>
>>966716
I've had that problem before and it was due to under extrusion. Basically, you're printer can't print as thin as what your settings dictate (because of nozzle size), so it's being sliced with awkward distances between fills and funny speeds to simulate a thinner extrude, leading to weird artifact patterns.

In slic3r, extrusion width is under print settings>advanced
>>
>>966719
Huh, oddly enough, my printer was supposed to ship with .4mm nozzle yet the settings (in the config provided on the site) are all for .45mm nozzle. I'll change to .4 and see what happens on my next print.
>>
>>966728
>.45mm nozzle

Is this a new meme like polar 3d printers?
>>
>>966710
I'll give them some slack for being a new flip company, but there is so much wrong with their content.

>ONE OF THE TOP FIVE 3DPRINTING COMPANIES YOU’VE NEVER HEARD OF

>Now the truth can be revealed: 3D FABLAB will soon rise as one of the top five companies in the first quarter of 2016!
>How? By producing 15,000 units of 3D printers, software, 3D scanners, CAD–
> a breakthrough in the state-of-art technology of printing!

All talk and no results. First quarter is already over and all they have to show is a WIP consumer printer.

Their prototype printers are a mendel90 and a mendel prusa.

>Anti-Jamâ„¢ Techonology
Somehow, they have managed to invent a red cylinder that attaches to the outside hot end which can prevent (and clear?) internal filament jams.

>Diamond XTRâ„¢ Techonology
some asian v6 clone with direct drive and many available nozzle sizes

>CNC Transformer Module
Apparently the flimsy frame can hold up to CNC routing and milling and can even support a SLA module

>Biggest Print Volume In It's Class
no

>Extendable Print Plate
Man, they've really defied spacial relations here. By making only the build plate longer in the Y direction, you can print more, even though you cannot physically print on the additional area.
>>
File: RedABS.jpg (236KB, 1069x881px) Image search: [Google]
RedABS.jpg
236KB, 1069x881px
>>966732
>meme
No idea. Don't know what the size was on my old printer, and I haven't the faintest clue how to check on this one, so guess it's just guesswork.

I also wish I could figure out why the hell my ABS prints are so bad.
>>
File: RedABS2.jpg (105KB, 716x533px) Image search: [Google]
RedABS2.jpg
105KB, 716x533px
>>966735
I mean, LOOK at it. It's COMPLETE garbage.

Lower temperatures don't help, higher temperatures don't help, fan's off... And I'd chalk it up to "bad batch" if I hadn't tried a friend's black Hatchbox ABS and gotten almost the same thing. White ABS seems to work fantastically, but I have no idea if that's one-off or if there's something wrong with the coloured ones. And I'd like to be able to print coloured ABS, anyway.
>>
>>966696
Check your hobbled bolt or gear, it could be dirty in a certain area. It would cause slight slipping when it gets around which would cause a predictable underextrusion
>>
>>966736
I guess I'll give you all the flight checks.

Step 1: dry your filament. I doubt it's the issue but its indistinguishable down the line. Put in oven and bake at 300F for 3 hours. Remove and stir well and continue baking for another hour.

step 2. Is it the nozzle or is it the printer? Extrude 100mm. Does it look like shit? If so, it's not the feed rates that are the issue. It should come out smoothly and look like a drooling autistic kid. If it looks bad, go to step 3a. If it's good, go to step 3b.

Step 3a: nozzle or filament. Is the temp 230C? I don't mean the thermistor, I mean get a meat thermometer and measure that shit. Is it really 230C? If so, your filament sucks. If not, your thermistor sucks.

Step 3b: software or printer. Did you change and firmware settings? If you are running repeater, did you remember to M502 M500 yourself before you wreck yourself? If you didn't change the settings, and you M500'd, move on. If not, revert to defaults and retweak.

Step 4: over/under extrusion. Mare the filament 150mm from the top of the extruded and extrude 100mm. Is there 50mm left? If so, move on. If not, that's the issue.

Step 5: nozzle or hotend. If all else fails, swap out the nozzle and try a new one. They are really easy to jam, and some are just cheap shit.

Step 6: printer or operator. Remember, a computer is only as smart as the idiot operating it. What kind of printer is this? Did you buy the Chinese special?

Step you suck: if literally all else fails, and you did buy the Chinese bot, bitch and moan to them on eBay or wherever you got this and threaten to give them 1star reviews if they don't take it back and give you a better, working one. Im pretty sure those people will blow you if you threaten to give them one star reviews if they don't.
>>
>>966742
>dry filament
Would a gas stove work? I'll admit, I'm a little nervous about this, but I've heard a lot of people do it.

>230C
Huh. I've always read/been told that ~255 was the temp that ABS was supposed to print at; this time I printed at 257 since my printer says MAXTEMP at 260. The green model above is (hatchbox) PLA at 210C.

>firmware settings
I've only touched Slic3r, nothing in the actual firmware itself. It came with an LCD screen and an SD card so I haven't connected it to the computer once. Not even sure what I would use to fiddle with those settings, only thing I'm familiar with is Pronterface.

>swap nozzle
Me damaging it isn't impossible, I suppose.

>printer
Josef Prusa's i3 bought from his Czech website - since he apparently designed the Prusa line, I doubt he'd try to cut corners on it.

If all else fails... I guess I have my old PrintrBot which I've almost got working again. It wasn't pretty or nothing, but in the years that have passed I could probably get it to work better than it did. 3mm though.

Thanks for the advice, I guess I'll see what happens.
>>
>>966737
pretty much this. Had the same problem. Eventually it will stop extruding completely. Clean and readjust the teeth gear
>>
>>966746
post slicer settings
>>
I got some TPE elastic filament from 3D Prima to try to dual extrude with. Does anyone know if there's a way to get it to stick to PLA? It prints fine doing single extruder prints, but it makes a mess when I try dual extruding starting from the second layer
>>
File: 1445120682610.png (78KB, 249x250px) Image search: [Google]
1445120682610.png
78KB, 249x250px
>>963452
>peachy printer long been hated on the general
>obvious different OP who didnt even put the correct name or abbreviation to find in the catalog

ok fine

>guy strongly shills for it in the thread
>go to >leddits from page today
>peachy printer being shilled on the on the TodayILearned
>hit the front page

Nice work OP, maybe you can convince the idiots who dont know better on TIL, but you arent gonna do it here.
Also thanks for fucking up searching on the catalog.
>>
>>966746
Oh shit, you print at 257? For stuff like that I use around 240, and it works pretty damn nice. Also maybe raise your bed a bit. I had some turn out like that when the gap between the bed and the nozzle were stupid huge.
>>
>>966895
The first few layers print nice and solid, it's just the subsequent ones which become almost increasingly crap.

>>966771
Will upload in a bit, I've got a bunch I've tried.
>>
>>966906
>>966771
www filedropper com[forwardslash]slic3rforanon
These are configs for Slic3r. Be sure to back up your own before you load this bundle, I'm not reponsible if you mess something up on your end. I only used the ABS and PLA presets, so don't bother checking anything else.
>>
>>966895
M8, I print low density polycarbonate at 260, and ABS at 230
>>
>>967016
I dunno about the poly, but 240 is my standard temperature for ABS, and I use 230 or 235 for stuff with a lot of gaps to minimize the spiderwebbing.
>>
>>967016
>>967018
Alright, guess I'm trying 240 again then.

So, nobody answered - is it fine to use a gas oven to dry the filament? I'm a bit concerned about that.
>>
>>967065
I dont see why not, unless theres some reaction between the gas and the plastic that I dont know about. Maybe try with a section before you use the whole roll, just to be safe.
>>
>>967095
I'll stick already-printed parts inside. Lord knows I've got enough failures.
>>
>ordered Duplicator i3
>assume the lead time wont be so bad
>5 days in hasn't shipped
I'll be waiting the whole 8+ wont I?
>>
>>967402
Could be worse, you could have bought a kickstarter printer and have been waiting close to 3 years now.
>>
>>963452
hey guys i'm looking to buy a printer soon.

was hoping i could get some feedback on this printer


http://www.gearbest.com/3d-printers-3d-printer-kits/pp_337314.html
>>
>>967682
The chinese acrylic kits like this are all about the same, and they all work reasonably well for the price.

What I can say is, dont let the "flash price" fuck with your head.
Shipping is another 60.

Its still coming from china, so its the same general price as a kit from Ebay or Aliexpress.
>>
>>967705
same anon here>>967682


after looking around a bit more. i found this one. decided to up the budget for what may be a much better printer.

http://www.aliexpress.com/item/Geeetech-Prusa-I3-X-3D-Printer-Diy-Acrylic-Frame-High-Precision-Impressora-Kit-1Kg-Filament-LCD/32405246910.html?ws_ab_test=searchweb201556_7,searchweb201602_1_10036_10035_10034_507_10020_10001_10002_10017_10010_10005_10011_10006_10003_10021_10004_10022_10009_10008_10018_10019,searchweb201603_2&btsid=a68c8e2b-6813-4927-af54-1791177e75a4

what do you think?
>>
>>967739
Just buy an i3 straight from the guy who developed it, you'll be funding his research and get a good product as well:

http://shop.prusa3d.com/en/3d-printers/59-original-prusa-i3-kit-with-lcd.html

Price IMO is worth it. No shitty Chinese electronics to burn, no acrylic panels to shatter, no shitty threaded rods to throw off prints.
>>
File: PrintrbotBoard_Small.jpg (2MB, 1560x2080px) Image search: [Google]
PrintrbotBoard_Small.jpg
2MB, 1560x2080px
So /3dp/, I have a weird problem. I'm still trying to fix my old printer (a PrintrBot LC) and I'm almost done, but ran into one problem.

My Z-axis steppers don't work, and I don't know why. It's further complicated by the fact that if I plug them in by themselves, they individually work - but not together.

As you can (sort of) see from the picture from before I took it apart, there's a Y-harness which ties them together electrically. I checked it, and there's electrical contact between the pins and socket.

WTF is going on?
>>
>>967782
Oh, and I did cut the wires to be half as long since I wanted to make the cabling a bit neater. That couldn't have done THIS though.... Could it have?
>>
>>967783
>>967782
Never mind, it just decided to start working again for no discernible reason. Which is bad, since it might arbitrarily stop working again.
>>
>>967739
It Ali one is a nicer printer in just the fact that it has a little bit better frame. The frame is the foundation of the printer, and just so happens to be a weak point in the cheap ones. The "A8" is really pushing it by removing literally as much as they can get away with. It will limit your speed drastically, and for people new to printing they dont realize that a single large print can easily take 10+ hours in one shot.

Some people on here bought kits that look identical to the geeetech one, but they paid something like 230 for them on a sale, which is why I brought it up in the first place to not impulse buy because of price. There will always be others in that range.

Just an FYI, with reprap stuff hardware is open source and clone shit. The cheapest most generic looking chinese steppers/ramps other hardware boards work fine. "Geeetech" is a company that brands these cheap boards and marks them up like crazy. Putting a name on it doesnt make it a better stepper driver.

The only thing defining about these cheap chinese kits is the frame.

But honestly, if you are willing to slightly raise your budget for the "geeetech" there are other things out there where the frame isnt an issue.

Like the Pegasus Makerfarm (much higher quality kit in every sense) or something like a Wanhao Duplicator. You can even forego cartesion printers and get something like a Folger Tech kossell 2020 Rev B. Prolly a few others I forgot, but all are very good printers for the price. Worth saving up a slight amount more.

With that said, 210$ is a pretty low pricepoint to get into the hobby if you are really strapped for cash.
>>
should i print herringbone gears for the extruder? i wonder if its actually worth diassembling the extruder and getting my hands black as fuck from the retarded lithium grease i use for my rods
>>
Getting a replacement M3D next week. Really thinking about selling it because of how slow they are. And my first one burned itself out in less than 3 months. They wanted to charge me $175 to replace it, until they realized it was under warranty. Anything around that price I can replace it with?
I was looking at the Replicator Mini, but there seems to be a lot of negativity around it.
>>
>>968757
>replacing M3D with replicator

Why don't you just replace your annoying, closed source pile of shit with a larger, more annoying, closed source pile of shit.

Printrbots are pretty good entry level machines that aren't that difficult to use, and not that expensive. Or go buy the Chinese i3s and roll with that.
>>
>>968910
I'm so tired of the M3D. I have a box of failed prints and maybe got 2 or 3 good ones.

I've been looking at Printrbots for a while - are they pretty safe as far as fire hazards go? I've seen one guy's who caught fire. But he also wired it like an asshole.
>>
>>969037
Fires are caused by being stupid. The problem with free and open source is that you are free to fuck everything up. If you tighten all the nuts down, make sure all the software safeties are enabled, and ensure the heating element won't slip out, you should be fine.

Regardless, I would keep the printer on a metal or stone counter so if it does go up, nothing else burns. The chances of a fire are low, and the manufacturer is pretty good. The only problem is that the plywood frame will bonfire if it does light up
>>
>>968694
Properly printed herringbone are much nicer than straight gears, no backlash during retraction
>>
File: IMG_20160104_233619862.png (174KB, 420x223px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20160104_233619862.png
174KB, 420x223px
I need a clip or some other device to hold 1mm breadboard leads onto the pins on a WSON-8 microchip. How do I go about getting someone to design and print it.

Pic related, chip on the left.
>>
Just announced/ on the shop today

http://www.makerfarm.com/index.php/12-pegasus-kit.html

soon as the deluxe upgrade kit comes out, gonna do the pegasus 8in to 12+ deluxe upgrade

looks amazing and would be nice to have a much larger print volume
>>
File: stringed_p_preview_featured.jpg (84KB, 628x472px) Image search: [Google]
stringed_p_preview_featured.jpg
84KB, 628x472px
I'm seeing 3D printers on Amazon going for 350-500 bux. I'm sorely tempted.

http://www.amazon.com/Monoprice-Maker-Select-3D-Printer/dp/B018GZBC3Y
http://www.amazon.com/Reprap-Guru-DIY-Prusa-Printer/dp/B011PVIMPW

What kind of print quality can I expect from them? Will they produce crap-quality like pic-related or could one get something much smoother?

How finicky are they? Do they need constant tweaking or do they Just Work once you dial in the settings?
>>
So I'm the idiot working on the Zcorp z510, which is like being the vet to an elephant compared to a dog. Everything is impossible to find, and some stuff isn't even made to begin with.

since Zcorp is gone and 3D systems doesn't want to continue the line, the OEM manufacturer doesn't make any more binder. Does anyone know where to get binder and head cleaner for this majestic beast of the wild?
>>
>>970494
Thats a binder-inkjet type printer, you prpbably won't get much knowledge on that here.
Maybe look into http://www.layerbylayer.de/products/materials/zprinterprojet-x60.html
>>
>>966817
I ran out of characters to put in, hence no abbreviation.
>>
File: 20160331_181956.jpg (1MB, 2560x1920px) Image search: [Google]
20160331_181956.jpg
1MB, 2560x1920px
>>970494
I found this:
http://reprap.org/wiki/Powder_Printer_Recipes#Z-Corp.E2.84.A2_binder_fluid
i am not sure if that helps you.
It looks like there is a lot of water in it. What is powder made of? PVA?

>>966735
>>966736
If you have not yet find a solution:
I tried to print ABS at 220°C without fan (cuboid, 25x25x25mm, one perimeter, 1 bottom layer, no top layer, no infill). It started making a mess from beginning, so after like 5mm I turned the fan on 50%. And it printed much better. But it also cracked on one place and it has generally poor interlayer adhesion. Pic related.
So, turn your fan on, and see what happens.
>>
>>970478
Currently, they all make crap finish quality, non-durable items. 3d plastic printers are still brand fuckin new and aren't refined enough to make good stuff to replace buying things made in an injection mold.
>>
>>970614
3d printing has been around since the late 70s, there are many type of 3d printing that give spectacular results.

Its only now that people are using small cheaply built machines in their home
>>
>>970478
FDM printers won't get precision much under what you see in the pic, but you can definitely improve how it looks. Some post processing with sandpaper also helps with the final quality.

I bought a CTC 3D Printer from ebay for about 400$ (shipping from UK) and I'm getting fairly decent prints, only limiting factor is how good my gcode is, which I am still adjusting.
>>
>>970650
there's also the fact that fdm Has such a broad range of hardware. a .25 nozzle at 100 microns is going to look like a miracle compared to a .5-.8 nozzle at 200+ microns.

and along with gcode, learning how to design your models to take advantage of your chosen extrusion width is a very big deal.
>>
>>970614
My son-in-law showed a Buddha statue he had printed. I was blown away by the print quality. It obviously wasn't injection molded but then again I would not have guessed it was 3d printed had he not told me.

Wish I could remember what printer he was using. I do remember it was 63 grams, no more then 4 inches high and took 10 hours to print.
>>
>>963452

anybody ever tried a pneumatic or hydraulic actuated 3d printer
>>
>>970830
that's never going to be precise enough.
>>
So got a Flashforge.

Anyone got a good guide for setting up the software?

Thought it may be good to use Slic3r since I've heard the default stuff is slow if nothing else, but can't really seem to figure out the set up of any of it.
>>
File: SupCom construction.jpg (374KB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]
SupCom construction.jpg
374KB, 1280x1024px
>>970478
I've never gotten such finishes on my prints, but my friend has - I guess it depends on what kind of printbed you have and how you remove it. I have glass and use a razor (like for box cutters), and he has tape over aluminum and just tears it off (and his looks like that).

>>970614
I disagree on the first two points but agree on the third. Finish quality can be excellent (.1mm height .4mm nozzles) and like >>970621 said, printers are not by any means new (but consumer ones are).

FDM will /never/ even compare with injection molding unless we get some kind of technology like pic related because of production volume. Small amounts, sure, FDM could win dollar-per-object-produced. 10,000+? Even 1000+? No way.
>>
>>970967
>http://reprap.org/wiki/Triffid_Hunter's_Calibration_Guide
It's in the fucking OP
>>
>>970978
Doesn't seem to be. That looks a lot like calibration and slic3r settings not if I need any other software to make it work which the halfassed documentation I found seemed to imply.

One I found is talking about extra firmware, gpx, slic3r, and tailored to mac and older versions so I'm stuck trying to filter out what is and isn't needed.

Loosen your anus or start shoving coal up it for profit some people actually do read the OP. I could see how maybe I wasn't specific enough on what I meant, but asking clarification is better than being a total asshat.
>>
File: nigger.png (184KB, 842x948px) Image search: [Google]
nigger.png
184KB, 842x948px
>>963452
The usb port on my davinci aio is broken and the company won't do anything unless I produce the original invoice wtf myan.
>>
>>971382
I once read that most usb plugs were not designed for a large number of plugging in and out. Not sure how true, but it would explain some of the problems I've had over the years.
>>
So I'm a pretty advanced printer veteran, but I ran into an issue I can't diagnose.

My layers are shifting, continuously (roughly the same amount every two layers or so).

Here's the kicker, acceleration is 3k mmps, so that's not the issue so the next logical issue is power being too low.

I tried adjusting it, and got this weirdo error I don't understand. If I turn the power down, it turns down, no issue. If I turn it up, it will work for a bit, then disables itself (like there is no power on it and you can move the axis by hand) for like 5 seconds, then renenable, work for 5 seconds and disable again. This only happens to the one axis, and it does not effect the other axes.

The lights on the bottom designate the motors are indeed receiving a signal, and I get the same issue when running off an SD print. The motor is not overheating or damaged, and the same error occurs on other motors when plugged in different ports.

Any ideas?
>>
>>971405
Try switching the pololu of the affected axis with one of another axis to see if it's gone bad.
>>
>>971411
This. To me it sounds like either one of your stepper drivers is shot or things are overheating and engaging the thermal cutout on the drivers leading to skipped steps. Do you have active cooling on your electronics?
>>
>>971397
Standard USB connector should be good for 1500 insertions.
>>
>>971557
Do we divide that by two for jump drives?
>>
>>971397
>>971557

Seems like it would be easier to just solder a new connector on.
>>
>>971702
Given the price of USB cables, I would just buy one.
>>
>>971683
We double it, since only about 50% of insertions are successful
>>
>>971734

I would agree, but it seems that what he's talking about is the usb port that's connected to the logic boqrd where you plug the usb cable in.
>>
>>971736

33% of insertions are successful.
>>
How do I get rid of Z-scar?

It makes my circles suck
>>
File: IMG_0476.jpg (1MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0476.jpg
1MB, 3024x4032px
What have I got to do to fix getting these holes and such when printing?
ABS on the Di3
>>
>>972231
inconsistent filament diameter
>>
I know this will sound like an stupid and uninformed question, but how feasible would it be to create a poor man's 3d printer/laser engraver from scratch using parts from ink printers?
Pic related, 3 guide rods and belts and some steppers (I have bigger steppers and even more rods which are not shown here) also I still have I printer left.
I can make all the circuitry without problems and control it with AVR microcontrollers.
I could build the structure with some kind of stable wood or thick acrilic or plastic material.
Ideally I'll just have to buy the extruder.

My main problem is I don't have three, not even two matching stepper motors, so care must be taken with the number of steps of each one and the torque required for each axis.
>>
>>972340
It's feasible but ...

One problem is that a inkjet steppers aren't going to have a lot of torque. They only have to move the flimsy print head/ink cartridge assembly back and forth. A laser engraver is going to have a much larger/heavier gantry moving back and forth. A 3d print head is going to be heavier still.
>>
File: 20160404_011021.jpg (640KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]
20160404_011021.jpg
640KB, 2048x1152px
>>972340
The hardest to build printers are sometimes the most rewarding.

I'll try you it won't be easy, but it's not impossible.another issue is that these parts are pretty much unique since they don't follow NEMA standards. If you break or fry them, you're fucked.

It could be worse. I have these 3 phase steppers (3 separate coils) I pulled from a 1984 Era typewriter. The typewriter axis is a glorious 12 inches of solid goodness, but I can for the life of me find our how to wire these motors to a RAMPS.
>>
Are any of you backing that new Olo kickstarter? I can't make up my mind on it. Using liquid resin hardened by a phone's screen? That can't be very durable.
>>
File: prusa_mendel_reprap_3D_printer.jpg (73KB, 562x599px) Image search: [Google]
prusa_mendel_reprap_3D_printer.jpg
73KB, 562x599px
>>972358
About the laser engraver, I was planning on using a medium power laser diode, nothing too fancy or heavy.

Maybe I could use a threaded rod for the Z axis which is the one that needs more torque.
For the X and Y axis I could buy another NEMA motor, since I already have one from a printer, I don't have pictures but here's a video of it when I was trying to make a homemade driver.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AycGjwckMc

So the end result would be 2x NEMAs at the X and Y axis and a printer stepper at the Z axis in combination with a nicely oiled threaded rod.

The last problem to solve would be the structure, threaded rods look ugly, but they're cheap and I hope not to wobbly plus they're easy to assemble. Structural aluminum frame would be the best, but I can't find it where I live.
The plan B would be to build a delta printer, they seem very simple, but I fear it will be a pain to adjust it and make a program to run it, I'm fairly good with trigonometry and math in general, but that seems like pushing the limit, I'll have to read more into that.

>>972380
>The hardest to build printers are sometimes the most rewarding.
You're right, I don't even need a 3D printer, but it could be fun to try and build one by my own.

About those motors, it sounds like you'll need to make your own driver then.
>>
>>972577
>"backing" any kickstarter printer
>ever

No, it's an awful idea
>>
>>972588
I'm less interested in the kickstarter aspect and more how the thing works. It's fucking weird and I don't think it's real.
>>
>>972613
The resin simply hardens when exposed to light, so the phone app makes the screen dark everywhere except where the new layer is, waits for a layer to harden, then changes the picture and moves the object up by one layer.
The catch is the resin. While it's true that there's no waste, even the smallest amount of resin costs a fuckton of money when compared to simple filament.
Also for all the talk about "portable", most modern phones wouldn't really last 3+ hours with full screen brightness and radio working on battery.
>>
>>972613
I don't see why it wouldn't work, it's just reliant on that weird resin.

If they could formulate a resin that would work like that, would work fine.
>>
>>972618
>>972619
Yeah I guess that's a good point...it does seem like the resin would be very expensive over time. I also wonder what the material properties of the resins would be, if they could be used i any sort of practical engineering application or if they're only good for modeling and making little toys.
>>
>>972618
>The resin simply hardens when exposed to light
Actually it's not that simple. Most resins used for 3d printing cure at UV or near UV wavelengths. The polarizers in LCD screens also act as UV filter. (apparently because UV light degrades the actual LCD but I haven't realy looked at this in debth). You can get polarizers for UV wavelengths, but at that point you are looking into building your own display device.
So since you can't get UV or even near UV from your standard LCD screens you need a blue-wavelength curing resin. And those are generally more expensive and perform worse than UV/near-UV resins. Leaving you with higher running cost and slower printing speed.
>>
>>972626
What's a ballpark cost on resin like that? Would it be too high for me to print say, warhammer stuff, justifiably?
>>
>>972618
Their resin is priced the same as formlabs resin, $15/100mL. Proprietary resins are common for SLA.

With the small print size and long print time, I expect use to be limited to miniatures and having to purchase a decent dedicated phone for this. Running at full brightness for a few hours at a time is going to grind the battery down.
>>
>>972657
Yeah, but an Olo at ~$100 is substantially easier to start with than a $3,000 formlabs printer....
>>
>>972654
Excluding the base, each figure would cost about $2-3 I'm guessing.
>>
>>972678
Add the cost of a smart phone with a decent screen and a removable battery and $100 will be closer to $600+.

With the size constraints 5" x3" x2" and slow speed ~1 hour/cm cubed, I'd rather invest in a formlabs.
>>
>>972678
> easier

Easier is not the correct word
"cheaper" is, and when you try and cheap out on any hobby you are going to feel the repercussions of it.
>>
>>972681
That's actually a very good price point, all things considered.
>>
>>972654
>Would it be too high for me to print say, warhammer stuff, justifiably?
thats entirely depends on model volume. If you find me a model & desired size I could calculate it with and without hollowing it out.
>What's a ballpark cost on resin like that?
The kickstarter for that OLO thing says $15 per 100mL. The stuff I use on my selfbuilt topdown SLA is $75 per liter which is half of that.
>>
File: photo11111.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]
photo11111.jpg
1MB, 3264x2448px
I have an xyz davinci 1, I started a print, had to cancel, and now a small layer of abs is stuck to the print bed. How do I clean this off, and how do I clean the print bed?
>>
>>972787
acetone, acetone eats anything ABS
>>
>>972767
The models are on a 28mm scale, but I'd say they usually average fitting inside a 30mm cube and comprise maybe half of that volume? For an average model. The monstrous infantry are probably four times that size.
>>
File: 13000-2.jpg (45KB, 327x480px) Image search: [Google]
13000-2.jpg
45KB, 327x480px
>>972787
>>
File: 6wire.unipolar.jpg (20KB, 338x347px) Image search: [Google]
6wire.unipolar.jpg
20KB, 338x347px
>>972380
That's a 4 phase unipolar stepper motor. You can use it as a 2 phase bipolar for more torque if you ignore the common wire between the coils (check resistances).
>>
>>972684
Old phones aren't that expensive and wall outlets are a thing
>>
>>972799
That would be $2 per model using the OLO-stuff and $1 with the stuff I use in my topdown machine. Obviously less if you hollow it out which might be necessary due to resin shrinkage.
>>
how hard would it be to DIY an SLA printer? i want to try this http://www.buildyourownsla.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=2768
>>
>>973017
It's realy pretty simpe. I'd post a pic of my setup, but I'm on mobile right now.
The important thing is to have a projector capable of curing the resin. Generally it needs to be a DLP-projector, some work without modification, some need the collor wheel removed. You already found the right place to get info on the topic.
Your resin tank shouldn't be bigger than one liter for the start. My first design had a 10l tank and I wanted to float the resin on glycerol which generally works but is a pain to hanle. I also had a resin level control system but had to remove it as it would have cut down on the now smaler build envelope. After testing It doesn't realy seem necesarry anyways.
Next thing you need is a liniar rail and a way to controll it. You can use whatever achieves the layer thickness you want. The screw driven linear stage I got seems to have some slight wobble. Maybe I'll try a belt driven stage, the forces involved are tiny.
For controling it you can use a off the shelf RAMPS and premade firmware. I used a smaler arduino board and a single stepper driver and wrote my own software for it mostly for the experience of it. Not that it is that hard anyways.
For slicing Creation Workshop works fine. It has some bugs though.
Maybe I'll add some pigment to my resin and get a friend to make a nice makro Image of a print in the next weeks. You just cant get good pictures of white prints.
>>
>>973026
what would be the limiting factor for build dimensions with an SLA printer? the DLP projector? i'm trying to see if i can get just the lens and control board so i can integrated it into a more compact system than just strapping an Acer projector like in that forum build, but i haven't looked into models that have the UV spectrum. someone posted an LED one which got corrected but the OP said you could mod it, but didn't go into detail stating he wasn't looking to mod projectors.
>>
>>972974
Batteries wear out and bloat and explode, especially if you run the screen at full brightness for hours at a time.
>>
>>973027
On topdown machines your limit is the size of the resin tank unless you float your resin as I said.
I bought a Acer H6510BD as it is confirmed to work without modification. There seem to be some problems with light evenness and a non-plane focal area though. Both of which don't matter to me at the moment.
Currently I focussed it to .1mm per pixel which is also possible out of the box but due to the now smaler tank I only use the middle of the Image where none of it's Problems exist.
Current build volume is a smal 70x80x90mm
I would advise against using anything but a full projector. Getting only the necessary parts of it sounds good untill you actually try to get them. Then you notice they are hard to come by and cost more than the full projector because normies don't buy them.
>>
Is it safe to clean a nozzle with a wirebrush?

Seem to get some globs on it at the end, even if its printing okay it feels like its building to a clog just from the dirty look. Good place to get more nozzles (flashforge) so I can just swap them while cleaning the others if they get bad enough I have to remove them?
>>
>>973041
It's probably made of brass, so clean with a brass wire brush or something softer.

I pick off the gunk every 10 prints or so while it's still hot with a single point scriber. The plastic gunks up and cleans pretty well. I have also taken a brass brush wheel on a rotary tool to it.
>>
>>973046
Thank you. Good I idea on the rotary tool those have loads of cleaning attachments and I have a wireless one I never use.

Kinda got unlucky and got a clog after my second print so trying to keep it from happening again because fuck that is a pain in the ass.
>>
>>973051
If it's clogging, it's due to something inside. Globs on the outside will just fuck up your prints by occasionally smearing some ugly black shit between layers. You can avoid leaks by cranking the nozzle tight when it's heated up.

Also wear safety goggles and a mask if you use a wire brush. That shit will fly everywhere.
>>
>>972654
>Would it be too high for me to print say, warhammer stuff, justifiably?

No, warhammer stuff's expensive.

But if you just want to copy stuff you can still buy Silicone mould making rubber and casting Resin cheaper. And just buy a pressure pot and a compressor - which is obviously much cheaper than an SLA printer.
>>
>>973031
Wall. Outlet.
Leave it plugged in.
>>
File: current setup.png (678KB, 409x702px) Image search: [Google]
current setup.png
678KB, 409x702px
>>973026
Pic for completeness. Nothing new though, I posted it in the thread some time ago.
>>
>>973098
Good idea.
Stop receiving phone calls and text messages for 3 hours just to print something in really low resolution.
>>
>>973098
OLO's kickstarter says that you must keep the phone plugged in. Keeping it plugged in a charging while running it it full capacity is great way to kill a battery and start a fire.
>>
>>973189
is it possible to put a driver IC that makes the stepper silent for that setup, like the TMC2100 - Trinamic?

i'm just trying to weigh my options when it comes to detail. i'm thinking of printing some investment wax models for fancy figurines. i don't know whether FDM would be sufficient or not. when i heard of the diy build using this projector i thought it would be good, although i still wanna try a smaller projector configuration since the bed is the only limiting factor for size.

there was also some other setups that used a UV laser. all in all do you think i'd benefit from any of these or should i try to go for something cheaper like in the OP which i have no knowledge of?

i'm thinking the Rostock MAX, the Atom 2.0, the XYZ Printing Nobel, and just DIYing my own SLA printer.
>>
>>973245
>the TMC2100 - Trinamic
Yea, you can even get it on a board pin-compatible to the Pololu A4988. It's called SilentStepStick.
>i don't know whether FDM would be sufficient or not
For figurines smaler than 100mm go for SLA. Most of the time I use my FDM machine, but I the stuff I print is usually more of practical nature. FDM just doesn't mix good with the geometries in figurines and I'm highly impressed by the print quality I got with a rather simple SLA setup.
>bed is the only limiting factor for size
As (probably you) said in >>973027
The DLP projector is also a size limit if you want 0.1mm pixels a 1080p projector will get you 192x108mm
>setups that used a UV laser
They need Input more similar to FDM printers as the laser actually needs to travel along a path and I have never been realy happy with the G-code generation for FDM machines. Full disclosure though I never even touched one and industrial machines seem to work fine on that concept.
>something cheaper like in the OP
I don't realy like the idea behind the peachy and the prints in their official gallery don't look verry promising to me.

All in all I would say:
-For figurines defnetly SLA
-if 100x100x100mm is enough for you DIY a topdown SLA
-if you need more space maybe go for a bottom up SLA either bought or DIY'd (FEP flex vat seems to be the way to go here at the moment)
>>
TAZ 5 or UM2+, guys?
>>
>>973258
the nobel does 128 x 128 x 200 mm which would help with tall figures. i'd do mostly standing ones. it goes for about 1500 which isn't so bad, although i'm curious what i could get in terms of a projector for that amount.
>>
Is there an easy way remove 3M 468MP tape? I'm in the process of replacing my PEI but this shit is impossible to get off.
>>
>>973274
Well of course you could also go for a 70x70x200mm tank or step your game up to 2Liters and go for 100x100x200mm I think you get the math behind this. You could also experiment with a floating resin setup, but as I said earlier it can me a mess.
>>
>>973281
well length and width would probably be the more debilitating factor in any of this, i mean i would like to have a super wide platform so that i don't need to make wasteful supports
>>
>>972973
Nope, its not. Just checked all the pins, and they only have a resistance less than 1M Ohm with one other pin, and there are a total of 3 separate coils. Its the stupidest shit i have ever seen.
>>
>>973296
I see. Maybe something like 70x200x70mm might work for you. Another idea is cutting your objects into multiple smaler pieces. That tends to be a lot of work though. In the end it's up to you. You seem to understand the concept quite well.
>>
>>967782
My guess would be open circuiting physically when you plug both in. Mine was funky, replugged everything. and BINGO
>>
>>971838
You mean 66%
>>
File: yyEwOHK.png (211KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]
yyEwOHK.png
211KB, 480x480px
>>973319
Pic related
>>
>>973275
Massage it off with your fingers, use a little ball of it to get the rest off. Then use LOTS of 99% IPA to clean any residue left off.

What surface is it stuck to?
>>
>>973371
Aluminum bed...

I tried making the "ball" before but it didn't help much. It's adhering too well
>>
do makerjuice resins work with the Peachy printer?
>>
>>973470
Peachy is going to sell its own resin
>>
>>973475
makerjuice is like 30/liter though.
>>
>>973476
Dont want to buy proprietary resin, dont buy a cheap weak printer that requires it.
>>
>>973484
what do you mean by require it? isn't UV activated UV activated? afaik it even says on their site it supports both laser and LED UV.
>>
>>973485
From what I read, since it doesnt have a real Z system that most resin is much to viscous which is why they are going to make their own.
Who knows how well other resin will print.
>>
>>973488
Little information from my side. While I was planing my build I wrote with some makerjuice guy. Their resin is actually what that peachy thing was develloped with in the first place.
>>
File: 20160406_133825.jpg (623KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]
20160406_133825.jpg
623KB, 2048x1152px
Thoughts on this ghetto bullshit solution to flexible material printing?
>>
File: Capture.png (184KB, 1201x486px) Image search: [Google]
Capture.png
184KB, 1201x486px
Today on "China doesn't know a thing"...
>>
>>973739
>PTFE tubes on both sides
Eh... I'm not really sure what you're trying to do in the first place.
>>
>>973751
I think it's more of "let's try to get the most views possible with unrelated keywords"
>>
File: Untitled.png (853KB, 1158x488px) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.png
853KB, 1158x488px
alright guys. i'm thinking of getting a rostock max with a dyzendx feeder and a SilentStepStick. thoughts? i want to make detailed sculptures. are there investment wax filaments by any chance?
>>
>>973782
I found those: http://www.machinablewax.com/product.php?product=52
http://www.makergeeks.com/molowaxcawi3.html
but I never tried them. The first link says, that is kind of flexible, so I don't know how this would go with Bowden extruder.

Why did you choose dyzend extruder compared to e3d or stock extruder?
>>
>>973790
it supports a higher temperature so i could utilize fiberglass or kevlar in the future.
>>
>>973790
oh my bad i didn't mean the e3d couldn't be hot, but the abrasive element i haven't gotten info on for it. is the nozzle brass?
>>
>>973794
I think so, but they also have hardened steel ones, but are quite expensive.
http://e3d-online.com/Extra-Nozzles/V6-Nozzle-Hardened-Steel-1.75mmx0.4mm
>>
>>973814
afaik the dyzend is titanium.
>>
>>973818
It says Hard stainless steel.
http://shop.dyzedesign.com/product/hexa-nozzle-kit-125560.html
>>
>>973827
i could have something in there was titanium. i guess i'll go the e3d route. how are they?
>>
File: 1438668495605.png (56KB, 401x372px) Image search: [Google]
1438668495605.png
56KB, 401x372px
>>973195
>>973031
I'm sensing a trend here. Do you guys just mash your head against the keyboard without reading what you're replying to?
>Old phones aren't that expensive
>wall outlets are a thing
Literally my entire argument.

>>973242
Unless there's a major manufacturing defect it's VERY unlikely ANY phone will self immolate, fully charged or otherwise.
>>
File: 1338517320899.jpg (60KB, 922x614px) Image search: [Google]
1338517320899.jpg
60KB, 922x614px
Should I buy a CTC 3D printer for $400 shipped?

About me:
>unemployed engineer
>can use 3D CAD
>have Inventor and Fusion 360
>have ideas
>can program in a few languages and Arduino
>want to make money
>think that being able to print with dissimilar supports is more useful than a tiny bit more build platform on an i3

Are there people out there actually putting FDM 3D printers to good use for prototype/design/development? In my last job I spent a good amount of time designing and printing prototype parts for machines we were designing. Do people contract this shit? How do I market myself?
>>
what's the best bang for buck 3D printer when it comes to high res detailing animu figs?
>>
>>974011
You're going to want a DLP SLA, so probably the UNCIA 3D ($1350) or build one yourself.
>>
>>974015
>100 micron

is that ok? even FDMs go like 50 now.
>>
>>974016
0.1mm is quite thick for SLA machines. I've read of people pushind down to 0.025mm on diy setups. But for now I print at 0.1mm to save some time.
Keep in mind that layer thickness isn't everything.
For example FDM has problems with convex overhangs while bottom up SLA can have layer seperation issues.
>>
>>974029
if i go UNCIA im worried about the build volume being too limiting. is it fixed?
>>
>>974016
>even FDMs go like 50 now.
doesn't mean it'll look remotely good as SLA
>>
>>974034
even the atom? it seems to be the best looking one out of the bunch. that being said it's 1700. i'm just looking at build volume too a bit, mainly because i'd be doing biped figs and the size of the UNCIA seems too small.
>>
>>974035
How big are your figures?

It's going to be hard to get good looking figurines without LOTS of post processing with an FDM. FDMs inherently have problems with small details which would drive me mad if I was making figures. I don't know what quality you're expecting, but if you want smooth and consistent features, go SLA.
>>
File: JackStand.jpg (180KB, 977x893px) Image search: [Google]
JackStand.jpg
180KB, 977x893px
>>974051
Not him, but what defects? I've got some pretty small figures on my desk (busts) which I find pretty high detail. Granted, they're not 40k-sized, but it's a little unreasonable to expect that quality from FDM anyway.
>>
>>974030
Jea, its 102x77x170mm
A size you could get with a simple 2liter topdown SLA
>>
>>973853
I run a 3D printing LLC out of my house with some colleagues.

To make money printing you need a few things:
1) know your machine and it limits. Not everything can be made. I've worked with a stratasys uPrint, and even then I've had bed adhesion issues and things that just wouldn't print. A CTC is limited to mostly ABS and PLA.
2) know your customer base and target them. Are you selling parts to students? Engineering or art? Engineers don't care about looks so long as it hold up to forces (abs) and artists are the opposite (pla).
3) know what you CANT do. A CTC cannot do polycarbonate. A CTC won't be the best for small parts. If your customer asks for it, you have to turn them down, or else you will be wasting your time and theirs.
4) get a hubs. 3D hubs is by far the most popular thing to get prints done. I have over $200 worth of orders live right now, and most are though hubs.
5) location location location. If you are near a college town, go seek them out and offer them a discount. Even if you boost your prices by 20 %, then offer them a 20% discount, that looks a lot better than just selling it to them flat rate.
6) don't be a bitch. Engineering and manufacturing requeres a lot of ping pong between buyer and seller, and you got to do it for them, not for you.
7) you probably won't make a living off it, but it's a good amount of extra cash on the side. Competition is fierce, because literally anyone can buy a printer. Either make yourself distinguishable somehow (8ft build area, crazy materials, full support, etc) which a CTC won't really do for you, or you need to be high speed (2day turnaround) or priced competitively, which will likely lead to about 10 dollars an order, and depending on where you are, that's about 1-3 orders a week. Not really enough to live on, but certainly some extra spending money to play with.

If it was easy, everyone would do it.
>>
Alright guys, I just ordered a RAMPS FD from China to get a 3rd extruder on my machine.

Aside from the fact RAMPS FDs are prone to lighting on fire, how bad a decision was it to purchase this?
>>
What is the point of something like the Rostock Max? The only one advantage it has over a Prusa for example is the about twice as big Z size limit, but you could probably make the Prusa better in that regard by rebuilding a few parts. Accuracy is about the same, speed is better but not "costs 4x as much" better, is there something else?
Not trying to shit on the Rostock, I'm just looking for a printer to buy myself and I don't understand what you are getting for $1000, versus the $250 or so that building a Prusa costs.
>>
>>974079

Idk if this is verboten or not, but do you have a way I can contact you? I need a small piece designed and printed.
>>
For building an enclosure, is air tight OK? I have an airscrubber to clean air, and don't want neither noise or air to leave.

Will something overheat? Is an exhaust vent needed? I'd really prefer not
>>
>>974051
not always but they usually hit about 160-190mm.
>>
>>974113
delta printers tend to be faster.
>>
>>974113
Well you pay a premium for well put together kits.
A 250$ prusa is far from a nice kit, you are buying it from china with literal bottom of the barrel parts. They will lay plastic, but doesnt mean the parts are quality.

As for the Rostock, its got top of the line stuff.
Hell it comes with a RAMBo controller board, which costs 175$ just to buy itself, not some junk clone Ramps 1.4. There are a lot of custom one off parts for that printer, and its cut and made in the USA. High quality steppers, boro glass and custom printed heated bed.
Its a premium kit.

You can get away with clone and really cheap parts for most of your printer. Build up a Prusa I3 kit by yourself with top of the line parts will put you in the 7-800$ range anyways.

You can get cheap chinese Delta kits too though.
Like the Folgertech Kossel 2020

Its like asking why the "official" Prusa I3 is 600$. And that one doesnt even come with a metal frame
>>
>>974135
if you want a design, you can contact me at [email protected] and i can make it for you.

As for printing, your best bet would be to find a local 3D hub and get it made there, as, if it is a small part, shipping from a distance will cost more than it's worth, especially if you are outside the US.
>>
For those talking about the peachy printer resin. The cost and proprietary resin is being debated on the forums. Yes you can use makerjuice, but more importantly apparently there is some cheap uv activated resin out there that should work.
>>
>>974288
http://smile.amazon.com/Solarez-Cure-Clear-Casting-Resin/dp/B00TGH6C2S

This is one of cheap ones that should work at like $70 for a gallon.
>>
>>974207
>official Prusa doesn't come with a metal frame
I guess they must have changed that, 'cause mine certainly does.
>>
>there are still people that use marlin over repetier OS

why lol?
>>
why do the peachy prints look so shit? does printing large circumvent this?
>>
>>974405
Well changing the firmware is not someting you do everyday. When I built my printer this firmware didnt exist.
How about instead of memeing around you tell me the advantages of this firmware you are shilling for has to offer over marlin?
>>
File: image.jpg (55KB, 580x464px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
55KB, 580x464px
>>974655
>implying 90% of people who own a 3D printer aren't just narssassitic assholes that know very little about other softwares/firmwares/printers in general and just make a stand about their chosen setup and get off to stroking their massive egos like an oversized cock to make themselves look and feel like experts In a field that is new enough to the mainstream that there are no real experts, and in truth, have nothing to back up their clams but just like to insult people's opionons because correcting others make you look like you know more about what you are talking about when you really don't.

Not him, but I'll say this: I've been on reddit, here, and a 3D printer hobbist Facebook group, and the above statement is the most true thing I have ever seen. I see it in most of you, I see it in myself, and I see it everywhere in the 3D printing community. I once got in a heated argument over whether the Taz or the Ultimaker is the better machine, and neither of us had either one!

No printer or software inherently sucks. If you can get good prints out of it, good for you. Keep doing what works. That being said, in this dog-eat-dog industry, defending your favorarates is critical in determining the rise and fall of printer companies. To be honest, I doubt he has even plugged in marlin.
>>
>>974683
Well what is the better machine then?
>>
>>974690
I don't think you got the point.
>>
>>974832
I do but Im curious anyway :^)
>>
File: IMG_0478.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0478.jpg
2MB, 4032x3024px
Oh dear
What could have caused this issue?
ABS
>>
>>974917
Thermal shrinkage managed to pull your layers apart. Higher printing temperature might work (stronger layer to layer adhesion). But your best bet is using PLA.
>>
>in the middle of building new printer
>have all the rails and parts set up for NEMA 23 motors
>old printer uses 23s
>have to design parts for the new printer that can mount the linear glides and 23s to the other axes but cant use the 23s because they are on the old printer
>trying to decide whether or not i should dump $80 on 3 more 23s or try and guess how to make the parts fit without actually having them
>>
>>975357
Why 23s for a 3D printer? Aren't 17s plenty strong?
>>
>>975360
i was able to get a few 23s for a relatively cheap price before, so i used those on my initial printer and kept the design for my second printer
>>
>>974917
perhaps the printer is athiest
>>
I'm using a Lulzbot Taz 5 with ABS.

For some reason the fill on layer 1 has gaps, and layer 2 is typically missing its outer edge piece. Layer 3 has minor issues but seems to build up correctly for level 4 and beyond.

As well, there are occasional brown spots on some but not all of the test pieces.

I'm using 235C for the nozzle and 120 for the board.


The tops come out smooth and fine, they do not show evidence of tip dragging.
>>
>Deltas look incredibly cool and have a few advantages when it comes to tall machines, but in general, they are a pain to set up, they can be incredibly wobbly if built incorrectly and have a few other artifacts in their prints might be pretty hard to diagnose and get rid of.

deltas are so good and they are the future right guys?
>>
File: 15696166833_5a2727bfac_o.jpg (306KB, 690x959px) Image search: [Google]
15696166833_5a2727bfac_o.jpg
306KB, 690x959px
>>975489
aren't deltas super refined when it comes to prints compared to Cartesian? i haven't found a single Cartesian printer that's superior to the atom in terms of consistency and detail. if there is one i'd go for it in a heartbeat instead, especially if it's a diy since the atom is like 1700 smackeroos.
>>
>>975496
Is there any truth to that image?
>>
>>975498
in terms of the specs yes, but the pics are color edited i believe to show constrast. for the most part the atom does seem to do detail well. i know dannychoo uses it for his figures and replaced his Form 2 with it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=syfe011Qe9I
>>
File: IMG_20160217_211855.jpg (129KB, 608x832px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20160217_211855.jpg
129KB, 608x832px
>>975499
just because the printer says it can print at 0.254mm layer height as a MINIMUM, doesn't mean that's what it actually can print at mechanically

i typically print everything i make a 0.35mm layer height, but i've printed at 0.0125 before, this being on a printer that cost under $200 for me to hand design and make myself

i'm certainly not saying my print quality is good at that fine of a resolution, but on a professional quality machine or one that has a bit tighter tolerances, it would be near perfect. also a cube that's hollow and about the size of a dime square took 1.75 hours to print
>>
>>975504
wew that's pretty long. i'im worried about time frame and loudness when it comes to figure printing. what would be my best choice for filament based in terms of price and performance? i was thinking a prusa i3 with an e3d head might give me a balance of quality and speed but i'm not sure yet.
>>
>>975505
i only use hatchbox filament

i have a geeetech mk8, and my next design is based off their dual extruder, except it's broken off the carriage as bowden

hatchbox has unparalleled quality for consumer filament, and geeetech stuff is cheap as shit and they replace it for free if it's broken - the only thing i would EVER spend over $100 on as far as printing would be the diamond hotend
>>
>>975496
>aren't deltas super refined when it comes to prints compared to Cartesian?
No, their Z resolution is equivalent if using screws and worse if using belts.
The print pictures are useless beacuause white.
Not that it matters. I never find me seriously printing at layerhights below 0.25 mm with FDM machines.
>>
>>975515
is there any FDM machine that can print below that in a consistent fashion?
>>
>>975516
Yeah, I do .2 for "regular" prints on my Prusa and .1 for decorative things.
>>
>>975516
Most of them can. It's just not practical to me.
>>
>>975520
can the prusa do .05 with a different head?
>>
>>975525
i ask this because i'm interested in http://www.aliexpress.com/item/Big-size-220-220-230mm-High-Quality-Precision-Reprap-Prusa-i3-3d-Printer-DIY-kit-with/32516976282.html?spm=2114.01010208.3.73.cIuCJO&ws_ab_test=searchweb201556_6,searchweb201644_3_10014_10001_10002_10005_301_10006_10003_10004_62,searchweb201560_8,searchweb1451318400_6148,searchweb1451318411_6449&btsid=b05a30be-ba1e-4043-938b-f39f7e6f5ed8
>>
>>975525
I don't know, haven't tried it. Might over the summer when I have free time and such.
>>
>>975528
The frame on this one does't look very stable in direction of x axis. Compared to this one: http://www.aliexpress.com/item/2015-Upgraded-Quality-Full-Acrylic-High-Precision-Reprap-Prusa-i3-X-DIY-3d-Printer-Kits-High/32409800856.html?spm=2114.01010208.3.47.4MBZdu&ws_ab_test=searchweb201556_6,searchweb201602_4_10017_10005_10006_10034_10021_507_10022_508_10020_10018_10019,searchweb201603_2&btsid=ad36d9ce-4ffc-47f2-bff3-18408f8724de
I am not saying that this one is any better, but frame looks much more stable.
It is also advised not to buy acrylic frame, because they like to crack.
>>
File: 3d printed lathe.jpg (151KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
3d printed lathe.jpg
151KB, 1920x1080px
Why aren't you making the tools to make the tools to make the tools, /diy/?
>>
>>975900
I am. Just not to an autistic level like in your pic.
>>
>>975901

You can't see the value in being able to construct your own machine tools? The appeal of being able to bootstrap any home with a PC into a modestly capable and easily re-tooled cottage industry?
>>
>>975900
that's a toy
>>
>>975908

It's a proof-of-concept.
>>
>>975905
Maybe you misread.
I do make the tools to make the tools to make the tools.
Just not to an autistc level.
>>
File: 1460270466166.jpg (288KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
1460270466166.jpg
288KB, 1920x1080px
>>975900
And this is why you shouldn't use countersunk screws with 3d printed plastic (or with any plastic for that matter).
Pic related.
>>
>>975953
you mean wood screws? i would rather use wood screws in plastic than machine screws in wood

or you could just print the countersink in the plastic by beveling the contour but whatever

>>975905
also buy a real lathe, aka something designed for the forces involved, and turn it out of actual stock like brass, aluminum or acetal
>>
>>975911
of what?
>>
File: screw.png (143KB, 782x698px) Image search: [Google]
screw.png
143KB, 782x698px
>>975956
It is not the problem of wood screw, the problem is the shape of the head. Even though you would make countersink in the plastic, when you would tighten the screw, you would also create force in radial direction, which can split the layers ( when the layers are oriented like on the picture). There also exist wood screws with flat bottom of the head, but are maybe not that common, I guess.

pic related.
>>
>>975960
oh yeah, sorry, i didn't notice the layer direction on the print, i thought you were talking about using wood screws in plastic. i completely agree with you on that
>>
Anyone here know why powder-inkjet based printers go by the acronym 3DP (3D printing)?
Is it just because Z Corp is retarded or is there another reason?
>>
>>975515
>No, their Z resolution is equivalent if using screws and worse if using belts.

Just no.

Z resolution is based solely on your steppers microstepping of your Z motors.

It doesnt matter one bit if you are using a lead screw or a geared belt, they are still moving the same distance that the Z steppers are telling it to.
>>
>>976013
>It doesnt matter one bit if you are using a lead screw or a geared belt
I call bullshit.
Lets say you have two 200 stepps per rotation steppers. one on a scre with 2mm per rotation and one on a 10 tooth pulley with a 2mm pitch.
The first on has 200 full stepps per mm the secon one has 20 full stepps per mm.
>>
>>976017
even so they are both fully capable for .1mm
>>
>>976013
>>976017
I think more than how many steps you get per mm, it's about accuracy, the belts stretch more easily than steel leadscrews.
>>
>>976024
Doesn't attack the original Point. I was merely saying that deltas in fact aren't super refined when it comes to prints compared to Cartesian.
I also said that it doesn't mater for regular layer thicknesses.
>>
>>976017
And?
Its still wholly dependent on your microstepping, which is much more acute than will ever be needed in a Z layer.

>>976027
>the belts stretch more easily than steel leadscrews.

I guess you havent seen how much play is in your typical lead screw. And How come people arent complaining about the accuracy of the Y and X axis? They also use belts and are highly accurate.

>>976029
>deltas in fact aren't super refined when it comes to prints

Elaborate.
Im sure you have something more than "it uses belts" when your prints rely on belts on 2 of your axis
>>
>>976034
The X and Y axis aren't carrying much weight at all.
>play in lead screw
Yes, but anti-backlash screws should fix that
>>
>>976037
>The X and Y axis aren't carrying much weight at all.

Of course not
An stepper motor and hotend is not heavy, nor is a whole metal carriage with a piece off glass and copper being thrown back and forth.

The Z axis is only holding a marginal more amount of weight than the X axis, and it isnt swinging that weight back and forth.
>>
>>976034
>Elaborate.
>Im sure you have something more than "it uses belts" when your prints rely on belts on 2 of your axis

>implying i would EVER use a belt on a cnc machine
>>
>>976040
>cnc faggot comes into the 3d printer general
>tries to compare a home printer to a CNC

Good job, everyone is impressed.
We know that a single linear bearing in a proper CNC costs more than any home 3d printer. Go on and give use more horse shit that is irrelevant to our hobby.
>>
>>976034
>Its still wholly dependent on your microstepping
Whoa, you opened up a jar here:
First of all both of them can use microstepping. If both use the same microstepping the screw will still have 10 times the resoulution.
But you seem unaware of how microstepping actually works.
It's real purpose is to cut down on noise. Lets say you use 1/16 microstepping. 16 microstepps will now add up to 1 full stepp but there is a catch. Not every microstepp is the same size. Some are a bit smaler some are a bit bigger fucking you over when it comes to accuracy. read up on it.

I haven't posted the second point. I'll leave explanations to the guy who did.

Now elaborating:
>deltas in fact aren't super refined when it comes to prints
-deltas have to interpolate on 3 axis (not necessarily a problem, but it also doesn't make them better since we work layerbased anyways)
-It's hard to design a delta without a bowden extruder (ballance issues) (Also no bowden VS direct drive arguments please you could always put a bowden extruder on a cartesian platform.)
-often stated point for deltas: Fast movement. But a well designed cartesian setup can be just as fast. (Also often cooling time is the limiting factor here not capability of the printer)

Rermember: My point is
>deltas in fact aren't super refined when it comes to prints
not
>Cartesian > Delta
In my eyes they are equal from a practical standpoint.
>>
>>976043
>>deltas in fact aren't super refined when it comes to prints

And your literal only point is
>have to use a bowden extruder

Bravo!
At least this time you admit that
>In my eyes they are equal from a practical standpoint.

But you are still backhanded shitting on Deltas with no tangible or practical reason to.

You didnt elaborate like I asked, you went on tangents that have nothing to do with performance.
>>
File: screenshot_799.png (70KB, 2024x1432px) Image search: [Google]
screenshot_799.png
70KB, 2024x1432px
>I built my own printer out of wood
>look at how much I know about printing, and how qualified I am to shit on a printer style I have never even seen IRL
>>
>>976046
>And your literal only point is ...
I think I listed 3 points
Have you listed a point why deltas in fact are super refined when it comes to prints?

>At least this time you admit ...
I think I was pretty clear on this right from the beginning. Remember:
>Not that it matters. I never find me seriously printing at layerhights below 0.25 mm with FDM machines.

>But you are still backhanded shitting on Deltas
Where exactly did I shit on Deltas?
I just stated the fact that they:
>in fact aren't super refined when it comes to prints
>>
>>976047
Hardcore projecting
>>
>>976041
>being this upset for no reason
>trying to say a 3d printer isnt a CNC machine

just because you label a 3d printer as a "3d printer" doesn't make it not a CNC machine

also, a c7 ballscrew probably runs $150 for the screw and flange nut, and anyone is more than capable of using linear bearing drawer slides (hint, less than $20 a pair) which when properly modified (aka you have access to a vice) are perfectly capable of far surpassing the accuracy of any belt or leadscrew

so now you're at most $350 into the X and Y, assuming you have the ability to get 3d printed parts from your makerspace or whatever, which isn't a stretch because people love to print shit for free for newcomers

now you need Z, which ends up being two leadscrews, which are under $20 each for 3 feet, and the nuts which you can either buy with the screws for the same price, or you can ask someone with a tap to tap it for you, again, not a stretch. $400 for XYZ

for everything else, $70 nets you 5 17s, which is enough for 1X/1Y/2Z/1E, $470, $40 for the ramps/arduino/screen/driver combo, $510, say $140 for the couplers and machine screws to your desire, $650, $50 for a hot end, $700, and $150 for your framing made out of 20/20 or whatever you want

now you're at $850, and you can throw another $150 for whatever you want, like filament (25 a spool), a heated bed ($20), power supply ($50), whatever

so for under $1000, you have a professional quality FDM printer that costs the same as the original ultimaker and outperforms it massively, and blows any lower grade "consumer" printer out of the water
>>
>>976059
Not the guy you replied to, but thanks for the tip on c7 ballscrews. I never thought you could get them so cheap. Might come in handy some day.
>>
>>976119
sure, it's normally about $150 for the flange, screw and bearings for the ends, even though these are very poorly machined screws in the grand scheme of ball screws, they're still miles ahead of any leadscrew or belt for accuracy and speed

the leadscrew is fine for Z anyways, so it's not like they're completely useless, and even though it's a big up-front cost for the ball screw (ie, why would i pay $150 when i could buy 1m of gt2 belt and 2 pulleys for like $10), but it will massively outperform and last a very very long time
>>
Anybody /diy/ a 3d scanner?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qeD2__yK4c
>>
quick question,
am I better off buying a cheap delta style printer,
such as http://www.aliexpress.com/item/Automatic-Desktop-3d-printer-large/32261046955.html?spm=2114.01010208.3.20.o0KCYD&ws_ab_test=searchweb201556_10,searchweb201602_3_10037_10034_507_10032_508_10020_10017_10005_10006_10021_10022_10018_10019,searchweb201603_6&btsid=1309ea61-5b9c-4d4a-997d-6718abc6fb97 ?

or a cheap prusa style printer? in the same price range
>>
>>977338
I'm in the same market and I've concluded that I'm best off building a cheap printer of my own that is a copy of http://folgertech.com/collections/3d-printer-full-kits/products/folger-tech-reprap-2020-prusa-i3-full-aluminum-3d-printer-kit
This is based on the fact that all non-delta chink kits have some stupid design choices and I don't really need or want a delta (although the small footprint is neat).
Only issue is that as far as I can tell, no one is selling plastic kits for this specific printer so I'll have to go to some makerspace to have them printed.
>>
>>977338
build a printer, ask for help
>>
>>977274
I use skanect. It eats processing power, but it works alright.
>>
>>977342
what do you mean build it yourself? you mean you aren't going to buy that particular kit and just get the components separately?
>>
>>966696
I'd guess your stepper driver for your extruder is overheating, causing missed steps
>>
>>971405
stepper drivers have a heat cut-off. too much current will cause missed steps due to this
>>
>>977342
I think i might go with the one you mentioned actually, its pretty cheap still and has a lot of DIY modifications that people have developed for it, which I think would be fun to implement.
>>
>>977605
Yeah, I don't live in the US, shipping would cost $60 for me, plus another $60 in taxes. If I buy the parts mostly from eBay and extrusions locally, I never have to pay tax and shipping is really cheap.
>>
I finally offloaded my M3D and decided to go with Flashforge. Anyone with experience have an opinion on ordering from them directly vs Amazon?
The guy from Amazon sent me a message saying "the seller provides customer service and support to their buyers only. This means your seller will offer technical support and customer service to you, instead of me".
>>
Between cheap shit filament and expensive filament that costs 3 times as much, what is the practical difference? I assume the latter will produce better prints more consistently, but is it possible to improve the cheap shit filament, i.e. cleaning it or drying it or whatever else people do, or are they just manufactured poorly and will never print all that well?
>>
>>977732
cool. do you think that particular kit would be capable of a lot of detail for stuff like figurines? or would you have to get better steppers?
>>
>>963488
The extruder will probably be shit, but nothing you can't replace with an e3D later on.

I've bought a couple of chinese kits and more often than not the thing that blows is the extruder.

>>974207
Some prusa kits are fairly well made, but they're going to be more expensive as well. I've seen prusa kit materials range from acrylic to melamine, a few even have a steel frame.

Rostock has a few shortcomings despite being $1000 for a kit, but they're easily fixable once you get it printing.

Printing an enclosure improves ambient temperatures which makes better prints, making zero lash straps and an airstruder is great too.

Max is a great design, only thing that pisses me off is when I have to wire some new stuff and stick it through those aluminum rails. Should have thought ahead and put a few more wires in there but I fucked up.


Anyone using Cura? I can't find the fucking bridge speed settings in it any more. I'm getting crappy first layers on bridges and I know my extruder temp and fan speed are spot-on. It has to be the speed or the way its being sliced, anyone here with some knowledge on bridging in cura?
>>
>>975496
Deltas CAN be better than cartesians, but there is more effort required to reach that point. When it comes to rounded edges I've found that deltas are king simply because they don't have that jerky motion a cartesian does when moving. They also tend to have better corners. A cartesian at high speeds often screws up the corners. I think what that pic is trying to convey(in a slightly bullshit way) is that deltas are better at fine detail, which is true so long as they're properly calibrated.
>>
File: DLP-Printing.jpg (700KB, 5500x4750px) Image search: [Google]
DLP-Printing.jpg
700KB, 5500x4750px
Hi there, is there an app for android tablet, that can drive reprap like just Z axis or it was SLA/DLP printer (just elevator func)?? I wish i could experiment with SLA/DLP printing, and i want to drive rather only Z axis, and for making another resin layer making it lift and a little back.
Also is there ann app for intersection viewing from graphic slicer?
>>
>>976059
Why would you use ballscrews? The extruder and frame are going to be crap anyway and you won't see a big improvement.
>>
>>978366
bullshitty in what regard?
>>
>>970830
Not that I'm aware of. Doesn't seem to be much point, given how light the loads are on a 3D printer head.
>>970847
>never going to be precise enough
>hydraulics
U fockin wot
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cR-YlZ9NdIA
They use hydraulics for CNC machines all the time (especially in metalworking). Hydraulics are PLENTY precise enough.
>>
>>978161
Steppers are most likely not going to be an issue, it's mostly the extruder and the linear slides, plus whatever inaccuracy there is in the threaded rods/belts.
>>
>>964853
I guess it depends what kind of 3D objects you want to design and print. If you're looking to print functional/engineered objects, a 3D CAD program is most likely the way to go. A professional program like Solidworks or Inventor is great if you can get your hands on a copy, or if you're NOT looking to drop several thousand dollars on software, you could try Onshape or Fusion360. On the other hand, if you intend to use your printer for more artistic designs, a 3D surface modeling program like 3DS or Blender is probably more your speed. Sketchup kind of splits the difference (being a surface-modeling program with limited capability in each application) so depending on what you like and don't like about Sketchup it could go either way.
>>
>>978733
>Hydraulics are PLENTY precise enough
Only if you have volumetric valves. Those things are expensive.
>>
How do I fix these swiss cheese layers? I am printing PLA 220 degrees with a Greg Wade extruder and E3D lite. Could wobbling be causing it?
>>
>>979122
I used to have terrible surface finish like you, but then I took a microstepping jumper to the driver.
>>
>>979199
I will see if I can replace my jumpers then. I think that I am extruding enough as I am using a fresh nozzle and after printing it can still extrude.
>>
>>978734
i see. it's hard to decide whether i should get his folger kit or do my own. what's a kit with a precise extruder and linear slides?
>>
>>979446
I don't think they sell any kits or if they do, you're better off doing the upgrades yourself to a kit like the folger.
SBR12 are the smallest and cheapest linear rails with support, you can get SBR12UU bearings for it which come with adjustable tightness making them pretty damn stable, you'd normally use these things on CNC routers.
Buying a good extruder doesn't take anything special, just pick one from the OP like the e3Ds and hope you don't get unlucky.
Getting anti-backlash nuts for the leadscrews (and using leadscrews everywhere) would probably help a lot with accuracy, but ballscrews are the high-end here, get those for X and Y at least.
These are all pretty costly upgrades barring the extruder though, so I'd first suggest verifying that you need to go beyond what the kits offer out-of-the-box.
>>
>>979460
oh yeah i'll definitely test out the results. i'm mainly trying to do figure stuff in the 1:8 scale range and i'm curious about whether i could get a similar quality to a goodsmile without using UV resin.
>>
>>977779
the biggest difference is consistency in diameter. Cheap stuff fluctuates a lot, so your prints have too much or too little material in different areas.

I can't imagine fixing this. You'd need to build a jig that feeds the filament, accurately measures it, accurately warms it, then compresses thin lengths and stretches thick sections.
Thread posts: 326
Thread images: 42


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.