Making your own spacecraft

I think it's physically doable since most of the things on the list are the same as the personal submarines diys. The issue of testing would be the kicker though. Do you test it to prove it is space worthy, or do you just toss it in a river and see what happens?

>>1116412

Maybe visit NASA and ask nicely to use that giant vacuum chamber of theirs.

>>1116414
Doesn't account for all the systems being in 0gs.

>>1116414

Put the craft in a room and release mustard gas in said room while
Inside the craft.

Rocket powered shipping containers already exist as viable spacecraft, and imitation crab meat is both edible and a fine radiation barrier.

>
I just mean constructing a vehicle that actually would support you in space. Radiation shielding, air tight, life support, thrusters, all that stuff.

Are you very young or very retarded? That's not a real /diy/ question and you'd know that if you used a search engine. Go Google and Get The Fuck Out with your stupid question.

>>1116411
>making functional spacecraft

although certainly possible in theory, you would have to be insane to make something complicated but completely useless, also you would never find out if it would work, so the premise does not hold up to begin with, it is like saying "can i make a submarine without going underwater" yes then it would not be a submarine, just a larping wankbox that you think it is water tight, but in truth there is no way to find out without testing.

TLDR stop larping and grow the fuck up

File: 20160425_103841.jpg (4MB, 4128x3096px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4128x3096px

>>1116414

Or you could pressurize the inside of the vehicle?

>>1116723
OP couldn't pull that off without disaster. Stop larping and get a useful education so you can filter out bullshit ideas and come up with good ones!

Learn to rack and stack your thoughts and you'll be a more effective person.

File: 20160426_102246(0).jpg (3MB, 3096x4128px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3096x4128px

>>1116745
>larping

m8 I work for NASA, pic related. And yes, the moon landings were fake.

>>1116757
how is this any proof at all

File: 20160426_104350.jpg (217KB, 774x1032px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 774x1032px

>>1116770

Because I already said the moon landings were fake. That's how you know I'm legit.

File: $_35.jpg (6KB, 192x300px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 192x300px

>>1116411
try making a working gasoline engine

go ahead and start small

build an inline 6 engine (requires the least parts)

>its fucking hard and imposible

then how about a small submarine? you could even cheat and use a plastic barrel (pic related) and add everything that you need to support yourself in there

>way to steer the container
>camera
>oxygen tank
>way to orient yourself on deep waters

then you could "probably" go ahead and build your own spacecraft

it shouldn't be hard, even some mexican narcos build their own drug-subs

PS
fuck you

File: blackpowdermotor.jpg (16KB, 324x184px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 324x184px

>>1116779
after finishing with your small submarine
go ahead an sumerge 300 ft deep, pick up any scrap under water and go back to surface

then you could go ahead and make your plastic container submarine fly from the beach to your house

you could even use one of these (pic related)

then you "may" be able to construct your own spacecraft

tip: try flying as high as 3 ft, just in case a failure occurs, so you can be safe

PS
fuck you

File: 0ad83be120d2f42a450f6a7067005b34.jpg (128KB, 1251x1320px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 1251x1320px

>>1116757
>moon landing fake
that should explain why the "soil" looked gray on the NASA tv transmision and brown on the chinese robot

>the robot wasn't calibrated
or maybe is just a chinese cheap glitch that turns gray colors into brown colors, but what do I know?

File: moon.jpg (170KB, 625x472px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 625x472px

>>1116787
the russians were right

the moon landing was a hoax

>>1116788
>russians
Huh? Isn't this hoax shit primarily US thing?

>>1116794
can't find the source, but since the first moon landing, the russians had claimed that it was staged

they even claim that the objects that "might be there" could be left my unmanned aircrafts

(we knows there is a fucking light reflector on the moon, we had used it plenty times)

File: _wsb_372x291_45+Apollo+11+laser+reflector+c.jpg (55KB, 372x283px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 372x283px

>>1116794
>>1116796
>if you aim a laser at any part of the moon, nothings come back
>if you aim a laser at this reflector on the moon, light comes back

http://www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/index.php

Scroll down to the bottom of the page for the directory.

The directories will teach you everything you want to know. Learning about rebreathers will help you understand life support, I just hope there's a better co2 scrubber than soda lime.

>>1116787

Yeah, I'm just fucking with people here. Looking at the Chinese pictures they either had shit tier tech or it was faked.

>>1116788

Russians actually backed up our claim by confirming receiving American radio transmissions on the dark side of the moon.

>>1116796
>can't find the source

Uh huh

>>1116797
Except in the 60's they didn't have telescopes to see where it was to aim at.

>>1116893
>Except in the 60's they didn't have telescopes to see where it was to aim at.
You mean the 1660's? That is when telescopes were invented. Then again, they sure as hell didn't have a laser powerful enough to hit the moon back then.

We're had telescopes capable of resolving very small objects on the surface of the moon for several decades now.

File: Salvage+1+Ad.jpg (968KB, 947x1387px) Image search: [Google]

968KB, 947x1387px

>>1116411
>doable?

No problem, champ.

File: poppy-about-page.png (533KB, 450x825px) Image search: [Google]

533KB, 450x825px

>>1116788
You sir, get a complimentary troll for your troll post.

>>1116411
Fun fact! The space suit is the smallest manned space craft.