Sculpting table

45

what is the thickness of the support board ( the board you need the angle for)

>>1091468
same
6 and 3 cm

>>1091466
45 is for 4 legs i think

>>1091464
its a triangle
360 divided by 3 will give you your angles
divide the answer by 2 to split each angle evenly.

60 degrees

>>1091464
It's more complex because the don't meet the legs perpendicularly. Draw it out on paper and calculate it.

>>1091488
this

can confirm, i am a triangle

SOH CAH TOA


cos theta = adjacent over hypotenuse

In this case the adjacent is the thickness of support, the hypotenuse is the length of the leg face it's joined to.


cos theta = 3/6 = .5

arc cos(.5) to get angle = 60 degrees as someone else mentioned.

>>1091488
360 is s circle. Dividing by 2 spared you from looking like a retard.

Have you tried asking /sci/? They are good at math.

>>1091503
will do
i think it's 60 as mentioned here
thanks

>>1091496
He was right though.

>>1091496
No. Full circle (360) divided by number of sides ( 3 in this case but could any whole number) to find the angle of the shape needef to close the circle. Divided by 2 ( for each of the cuts that make up the angle)

Here is that same formula for a square.

360/4 =90
90/2 = 45
To make a square i need to cut a 45 degree angle on each of my pieces .


Or how about a 60 sided shape.

360/60 =6
6/2 =3
I need to cut every angle at 3° and i will have a sixty sided polygon ( hexacontagon)

>>1091496
I'm embarrassed for you.

>>1091567
this.
the cuts are 60 compounded with the vertical angle, whatever that might be.

>>1091574
Not really. The 3 angles that make up a triangle are 180 degrees. Your just adding extra steps.

>>1091464
Compound cut
Need more info

File: natural-tree-stump-side-table-c.jpg (21KB, 523x523px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 523x523px

>>1091488
This, the final answer is 30º, you have three legs (60º corners), but 6 planks, each corner has two planks, therefore 60º/2 --> 3*2*30=360º.
The width and girth of the legs is useless, as using any other angle would be incorrect, therefore you're forced to use a 30º angle where the plank meets the leg.

If OP can't figure that out I've got a better design.

>>1091608
hate how those split when they dry. fucking nature.

File: LadyCalculatorHR.jpg (359KB, 669x1600px) Image search: [Google]

359KB, 669x1600px

It might be more /sci/ but we should have an equations general. Often I find it hard to phrase a google search to get helpful results

>>1091766
We have /sqt/ for questions like that, and /sci/ if you don't get an answer.

Generals are fucking cancer.