Captions thread
>>7047647
At least you posted the fixed version.
>>7047647
>>7047650
>My edit in the OP
Feels good man
I don't figure anyone wants to caption this? Sort of a free use caption?
why do all hypno captions wind up sounding exactly the same?
>>7047661
Because hypnosis is a pretty specific fetish
I've got ~1000 captions saved, mostly old ones, any requests?
>>7047669
Post cow girls
So what's everyone looking for? And/or wanting captioned?
If anyone's got them, I'd love some unaware hypno captions, or petplay ones.
>>7047671
does this count?
>>7047672
gotcha covered
>>7047671
Taking requests
open for femdom (really into momdomme, littlesisterdomme, and women raping gay men) and gay shit. but offering a few more options
>nervous virgin
> lesbian
> Literally any dialogue (for now, at least) between two characters in an image
> Crosssdressing as long as its not boring sissy shit
>spankings and other punishment
>rape (female on male preferred slightly, but any variant is OK
>incest
>>7047672
>>7047671
heres a cow
>>7047667
sucks, i'd love to see some more originality like this
>>7047682
Oh man, any more like this would be incredible.
>>7047688
>>7047688
this is the closest one I guess, kind of goes with that other one kinda doesn't
>>7047695
Oh man, I've been looking for this one. Probably my favorite caption, period.
Wish there were more like it.
>>7047683
That was a really boring caption.
>>7047695
got any like this one?
if anybody's got reqs, i can do some tonight
>>7047716
I have a few, any big limits on what you do and don't do?
>>7047716
something to do with butts or anal bruh
>>7047722
Nah. Not really.
>>7047728
Gotta pic?
>>7047730
requesting her telling anon she thinks he's cute and their gonna fuck whether he likes it or not
>>7047654
i wrote that one.
i love that you liked it enough to fix its mistakes. i wish I had noticed them.
Thank you.
>>7047730
>>7047730
Can I have a caption for this?
Could I get a caption for this? Tentacle/plant on male stuff is far too rare
>>7047736
Oh did you finish the caption for pic related?
>>7047776
I wanted a bit more info on what you wanted, this is a femdom caption? any specific fetishes, limits, or relationships in mind or am I just to use my discretion?
>>7047778
Femdom, Mom x son, foot fetish, drunk mom
>>7047762
Can do.
>>7047769
I know I said I didn't have limits, but I dunno if I can sexualize poil.
>>7047781
>drunk
this is never ever done right in captions
>>7047785
Alright ignore the drunk part then
>>7047785
Are *hic* you *hic* sure?
Come on, you can't expect the new kids on the block to be able to effectively express a character under foreign influence.
requesting, hubby got in deep with the mob, now wifey has to be the one to pay the debt off, she's mad because the next three after the ones she working on, are twice as big.
>>7047781
I tried
>>7047792
the thing is, how else do you express this with a character you've never seen before? we know nothing about this mom or how she acts when sober, how else can we communicate this is her drunk? just say she put back a few earlier today?
>>7047783
requesting sexual aggression with any of these Garnet Redneck pics
>>7047805
Nvm the caption was good I said ignore it as I thought you didn't think it would work well but thank you Writer-kun
>>7047811
glad you liked it! this is like, my 25th (been on rapid fire these last few days). if you have more suggestions or any constructive criticism I'll take it
>>7047802
>thinking i would do my 53 year old mom
>>7047806
This is where having a degree comes in handy.
>>7047806
drunk mannerisms, maybe a character pointing it out. I don't know.
>>7047806
>how do you write things
I don't know, that seems like the kind of thing you should probably figure that out before you try to write captions.
>>7047839
what "drunk mannerism" can be incorporated in a caption that isn't used all the time for ostensibly sober characters?
>>7047840
No, I got a writing degree so I could be a writer. You might not know this but I don't get paid to post here, I do it for fun. Although to be fair, I'm pretty sure someone who has read a book would be able to do this too.
>>7047840
Can you do a Femdom caption on this with a big girl dominating a shota
>>7047841
To be clear, you have nothing approaching an answer but you believe you can insult me into silence?
because, right now, your making it abundantly clear that you have no idea what to do.
and I know how to write it, its not my fault you guys arbitrarily declared i can't write it because "Muh cliches"
You fucking mongoloid
>>7047844
>You might not know this but I don't get paid to post here
I literally said "do captions...for free"
So I gotta ask what school you went to that just handed out a degree without even testing the basics of reading comprehension.
Your entire criticism was something based on false information you got completely from misreading y comment, so I'll take your opinions with a grain of salt
>>7047647
Anymore captions of these doting mother demons?
>>7047855
Why the fuck would you be this focused on actively discouraging writefags? if you have even a basic understanding of something, why would you be so stingy that you decide any question can only be met with mockery?
So, in the off-chance that your not a troll, you got some real ego problems, bruh
>>7047848
any fetishes and limits in mind? any general personality ya want?
>>7047865
Dominating and teasing personality. Armpit, boob, and Femdom fetishes
>anon asks for criticism for his captions
>people just throw insults at him with no criticism or advice
good job guys, it's no wonder these threads are dying.
>>7047861
Go ahead, just saying if you have to ask those kinds of questions, maybe you should be learning how to do something before trying to do it. No need to sperg out so hard at the slightest amount of criticism, which by the way speaks volumes about the kind of writing people can expect from you.
>>7047867
>my job
captionfagging isn't a job. a job is something you get payed for. captionfagging is a hobby, nothing more.
But you can't say that because "Somebody tell me how to do my hobby" is an entirely reasonable request, so you have to contrive a lie by which you can pretend its somehow unreasonable to challenge for writing advice on a Taiwanese basketweaving forum.
>>7047870
they didn't ask for criticism, to be fair, they just asked a fairly embarrassing amateur-ish question, and equally to be fair, saying "you're not good enough to be doing this yet" is fair criticism
>>7047872
>maybe you should be learning how to do something before trying to do it
How the fuck would I learn that? I'm literally posting anonomously, for free, for other anonymous users on a Taiwanese basketweaving forum. what conceivable method of learning could I do before this?
and yes, I have read books on how to write. surprisingly, "How to write a character as drunk in a medium where people already act entirely unlike real people without being able to describe their actions or have them hiccup" is not exactly a common topic for advice, anon
>>7047877
>they didn't ask for criticism, to be fair,
"i didn't read the thread, so I'll just lie to make myself feel better">>7047815
Nice try, but when you tell an incredibly blatant lie, people won't trust you
>they just asked a fairly embarrassing amateur-ish question
"Everyone knows how to do this thing. there is apparently a method, but none of us will ever disclose or even hint at it because we prefer being smug smartasses"
>saying "you're not good enough to be doing this yet" is fair criticism
the people I'm doing this for thought i was good enough. and where exactly am I supposed to go before 4chan?
so no, its a fucking retarded criticism
>>7047877
where are your captions anon?
>>7047869
muscle/ rape? looking for more dialogue or monologue?
>>7047890
Hmm monologue would be good
>>7047840
>>7047849
>>7047856
>>7047861
>>7047875
>>7047879
This right here is why this community is dead. Autism plain and simple. If you're really that butthurt over a single comment on a fucking website, just hide it, ignore it. Don't go on a rant that derails the entire thread, dumbass. Do you not see how you're the problem here? You asked a question, you got an answer, you didn't like the answer, fair enough. That's as far as it has to go. But the fact you have to go on a crusade to "right" some perceived "wrong" against you, which is comical in itself on a fucking anonymous website but let's forget that for the moment, THIS attitude is proving their point for them. If you can't handle mean comments on the internet, maybe you shouldn't be on this website. Thanks for fucking over the thread though, and probably getting these threads right back on track to being banned, you fucking mongoloid.
>>7047892
aight, I'll try my best, hope you like my script
>>7047893
the comments he's responding to are the real autism tbqh
>>7047893
Don't bother dude. You're wasting your time.
>>7047795
Extra points if the mafia-targeted husband is written as if he were Krillin.
>>7047893
Dude why not call out the sperg who initiated these reactions in the first place
>>7047893
>Autism plain and simple
So what, pointing out when someone lies is autism now?
>If you're really that butthurt
I'm not butthurt at all. pointing out when people lie does not mean you managed to pull an "Epic troll" and "trigger" me, it just means I'm trying to point out whats wrong with what some jackass is saying.
4chan does not say you get to say whatever retarded bullshit you wnat to people who actually try to make something and expect no one to point out when you say something retarded. if you decide to insult someone for no reason, you will likely get insulted yourself. if your this butthurt, maybe you shouldn't post.
> single comment on a fucking website,
You can't count to four? Or are you, again, lying because it makes you feel like I'm just a big mean bully and your an entirely innocent critic?
>f you can't handle mean comments
I can, as obvious by me still being on this website. how could an adult not understand that?
>and probably getting these threads right back on track to being banned, you fucking mongoloid.
You starting shit is not my fault, anon. if you don't want them banned maybe you shouldn't say so much retarded shit
>>7047900
Because all they did was make their opinion known, even if I disagree with it. If people can't handle that, they shouldn't be given internet access. Parents need to beat kids like the sperg who derailed this shit more.
If a guy is standing at the side of the road and holds up a sign that says "ur a fgt", if you swerve the car off the road and screech an autistic cry and crash it just to get out and have an argument, who's fault is it you crashed the car?
Anyway, have some captions for your troubles folks.
>>7047898
>get called out on how retarded your comment is
>respond to it with some generic affirmation in order to make it seem more reasonable
Best thing you can do guys: hide and ignore the guy who's sperging out, they're obviously just overreacting for attention. No one is actually this stupid.
>>7047905
>Because all they did was make their opinion known, even if I disagree with it
and all I'm doing is making my opinion known. the exact same thing. that's what comments are, expressions of opinion.
> If people can't handle that, they shouldn't be given internet access.
our the only one expressing an inability to handle someone else's opinion here.
>he sperg who derailed this shit
You mean you?
>if you swerve the car off the road and screech an autistic cry and crash it just to get out and have an argument
But you have no problem ding the same if you see two people having an argument?
again, seems like your a giant hypocrite.
>>7047907
you mean you? when my comments triggered you so bad you had to say my opinions don;t count because they hurt your feelings infinitely more then yours would ever hurt mine?
>>7047912
Wow. This is sad.
>>7047912
For someone who isn't upset, you sure seem to be typing fast and making a lot of basic spelling errors.
Requesting a caption of this girl's thoughts as she gets brain drained.
I didn't know that smut posted on a Vietnamese mine sweeping website should be held to the standards of high art.
See this is why I left. I'm glad we left cunts like this guy behind.
>>7047924
Nope, but there's got to be some kind of standard, otherwise we wind up with just a diluted shit quality base.
>>7047924
hey that's pretty good
Well I'm glad I came back today to see how this community was doing without us.
What's with all the drama?
Also, does anyone have either:
A) More like this?
Or
B) Futa cucking, dick size stealing, that kind of thing?
Thanks
>>7047934
Same as always, poke the thread with a stick, the spergs will respond. Sorry I don't have any, not really my thing. I'll see if I've got anything close.
>>7047929
Not mine, found it on the last thread. I just like those mothering demons because of their cultural context.
>>7047848
>>7047869
sorry I took a minute, had to deal with a sperg. I tried, hope ya like it
>>7047918
>>7047919
>Just ignore him
>No, I'm not going to actually ignore him, otherwise I may not actually get the last word of the argument.
also, no, I obviously don't care enough to check my spelling. funny how your so butthurt you have to convince yourself that not bothering to check somehow means I care more.
>>7047927
>captions much meet the highs standard of never asking how to do something incredibly obscure without doing precisely one thing I don't like
Just admit your a troll, dude. no one would ever criticize someone THAT HARD for asking a question.
>>7047934
>What's with all the drama?
One guy got SUPER-triggered when I asked how to make clear a character is drunk without doing hiccups, decided to samefag as four different people to in order to make it seem like anyone else could possibly have a problem with that question and generally avoid when I pointed out how what he said was either a blatant lie or made no sense
>Also, does anyone have either:
if you have some images, i cna try some requests
>>7047944
Wow, you sure aren't proving them right at all.
>>7047956
>Posting without a caption
>being THIS triggered over someone pointing out your being retarded
great job illustrating my point, man.
If you have anything resembling constructive criticism, I'm all ears. and to be clear, constructive criticism necessarily involves advice on how to improve. "get raped", "drink bleach", and "get out of my safe space your triggering me with your basic critiques" are not constructive criticism.
>>7047962
there is no the there is literally only you. you can samefag all you want, its abundantly clear from your prose that no one else is criticizing me.
also, great job trying to prove its somehow my fault the community is dead by going through the effort to point out someone else's flaws while making no effort to help or fix someone else's work. if your seriously this triggered, just go away.
>>7047965
why are you redirecting me to the exact messages you wrote? you already messaged me with that.
more importantly, why are you posting without captions?
>>7047969
again, why are you commenting on your own post? who called this a masterpiece? why are you posting without captions?
>>7047967
How is pointing out what you did wrong not trying to help? Are you retarded? I was feeling bad for you until now.
Also that's not called "prose" in this context. You should stick to the words you know.
>>7047967
>I can't read timestamps.
>>7047972
"he" pointed out two small spelling errors, circled "going" for no apparent reason, and the rest is just minor subjective stuff about formatting. "he" went out of his way to contrive problems and offered no advice whatsoever. Such as, say, why there's such a big problem with using the word "going"
>>7047806
Underageb&
>>7047973
>cellphones don't exist, a single person can't post from multiple IPs at once with no effort on his part
>>7047976
OK, why are you posting without captions?
>>7047971
Please stop responding to trolls, you are making yourself look like an idiot.
>>7047982
it's pretty obvious they circled going because it makes no sense given the speech pattern of the character
i'm not entirely sure you're not the same guy trying to prove themself right at this point, the first guy having left the thread long ago, you seem to be doing everything in your power to prove them right
>>7047987
>>7047973
Funny how you make such a big deal about time stamps but none of your dramatic, useless, thread-killing posts are more then thirty seconds apart. almost like your actively trying to destroy the community because your so upset about someone calling you out
>>7047970
>>7047971
>>7047988
Probably because most people aren't so sad that they feel the need to save this kind of stuff to a hard drive for use in a future argument for the sake of some kind of moral high ground, and therefore don't have a huge stockpile of fetish related images to call upon, because they actually do things with their time. Just a hunch there buddy.
>>7047993
>This wasn't me!
>I just happen to have incredibly specific insight into the caption-reader's psyche, knowing exactly what he meant by the vaguest possible hints
>also, I not only give even a single shit over who's right in this drama, I happen to have the exact same opinions as him as well
Stop samefagging. just admit your spamming this board with non-constructive responses because your triggered over a captionfag not kowtowing to your retarded demands.
>>7047958
be my guest. Did you want A or B?
>>7047988
>>7047996
If captions are sad, why are you commenting on a caption-thread? How on God's Earth is making fun of someone on a caption thread is less sad than, you know, POSTING CAPTIONS ON A THREAD FOR POSTING CAPTIONS
>save this kind of stuff to a hard drive for use in a future argument
So now I'm not only an idiot, I'm also a Batman/Doom style "preps for everything" genius who somehow foresaw he'd one day be involved in an argument on a caption thread?
>moral high ground
Its not moral highground, we're on a Taiwanese basketwaving forum. I'm completing the purpose of this thread. you are not.
> because they actually do things with their time. Just a hunch there buddy.
Because making fun of someone online is more "doing something with your life" then deciding to participate in something online?
>>7048002
either one is cool, friend. I have a slight preference for "more of this"
did you see what I posted? earlier on this thread? I can link you, so you can see my general level of quality and request I try to improve on what I've already written. I am, after all, still just starting.
Request teacher dom, lactation, breast feeding and keeping anon gender ambiguous if possible, cheers.
Jesus Christ, we're already lucky enough to actually be allowed to have threads like this for once. Can you please not screw it up?
Don't post low effort captions. Proof read your bullshit. Have a not-terrible font. Pick a color that is actually readable, or give the text a white backing. Maybe try a little more than not at all.
But by the same note, don't fucking "correct" captions just to be a snarky little shit and waste not only the image limit, but also everyone's time.
People. Please. This is not rocket science. Just post captions and request captions. If you're not doing one of those things, leave.
>>7048019
more gentle/belittling domme?
How do I put this politely... if you can't spell words, then maybe writing isn't your thing.
>>7048022
that's a super-hot caption, do you have any more like it?
>>7048023
Belittle, thanks.
>>7048011
>more of this
Cool. Will this picture work?
>>7048022
These threads are part of a community, this community is (supposed to be) here to help people improve. If someone posts a shitty caption, that's going to get pointed out, and people are going to point out why it's shit so they can improve. Otherwise we're all just sitting here circle jerking pretending everyone is perfect and couldn't possibly do better.
>>7048025
Plenty.
>>7048032
I'm not saying don't do that. I'm saying don't waste the image limit on something that could easily be told in text.
>>7048007
No, see, Batman/Doom are intelligent. They can actually spell, and wouldn't get frustrated and slap their hands on a keyboard just to try to prove a point, only to wind up with it proving the exact point they were arguing against in the first place.
>>7048028
I tried
>>7048042
Well well, somebody has learned to spell. It's a miracle.
See what you can accomplish when you take your time and actually learn how to do something before you try?
If you had listened to me before you might have saved yourself quite a bit of embarrassment.
A little humility never hurt anyone. Keep practicing, maybe one day you'll get the hand of structure and pacing.
do a caption for this, please and thanks
>>7048032
>(supposed to be) here to help people improve
By refusing to answer questions and instead deciding its necessary to belittle people?
>>7048038
OK, so wait, how on Earth was I intelligent, nay, prescient enough to know I would get on an argument on this exact thread and compile images specifically to post here if I'm stupid? am I someone who meticulously plans for events, or am I just some random guy freaking out? seems like you can't figure out your own accusations.
ALSO, POST FUCKING CAPTIONS
>>7047774
I second the motion
>>7048046
the spelling is PRECISELY the same quality as all of my other posts, you did not magically install spellcheck in my copy of paint by wasting an image and repeatedly commenting on your own post.
and its very strange how your such a connoisseur on the specifics of captions, but are totally unable to find more then 30 on your computer. almost like your talking out of your ass and just reaching as far as you can to contrive criticism
So shut the fuck up, you have absolutely no idea what your talking about
>>7048053
you're*
Also
>you have to save images in order to read them/look at them
Ok.
>>7047944
This is fucking awful. This is a joke right?
>>7048042
Thanks bruh.
>>7048053
Please fucking stop
Put effort into your captions and this anon will finally shut the fuck up. I am fully agreeing with you that this entire conversation is incredibly annoying, but you have the power to make it stop. It is not difficult to spell check and make sure the font is readable.
I just want a caption thread. That is not a difficult request.
>>7048055
Its funny how you know precisely what I meant but still thought it was necessary to point out the incorrect use of a homonym.
yeah, big fucking coincidence how your the only caption-fan here who not only has no captions, but are completely unable to just download a few so anons don;t have to suffer your incessant bitching without any curry. so no, you obviously don't read these, and certainly don't make them if you can't actually post one
>>7048053
Good thing you saved other peoples captions to post, you should stick to posting other people's work because yours is just not that good, sorry friend.
>>7048060
no problem, glad SOMEONE is here to actually look at and enjoy captions, bro.
>>7048058
you already commented on this caption five times, its really not necessary to do it again
>>7048062
>Please fucking stop
No, you stop. your not posting captions, constantly samefagging, and generally being a non-constructive dick instead of contributing to the thread
I'm posting captions. on a thread for posting captions. I'm not just going to stop because your so triggered over it.
>Put effort into your captions and this anon will finally shut the fuck up
You definitely won't, anon.
>I am fully agreeing with you that this entire conversation is incredibly annoying, but you have the power to make it stop. It is not difficult to spell check and make sure the font is readable.
I already do both of those. in every caption I made for this thread. so no, obviously that won't help
>I just want a caption thread.
Then take a hint from me and POST CAPTIONS
>That is not a difficult request.
Its not, but your refusing to preform it
>>7048063
It's almost like spelling matters and changes the meaning of sentences or something.
>>7048070
you're*
How have you made the same mistake this many times and not learned? Pavlov's dogs learned faster than this.
>>7048063
IT'S "YOU'RE". LIKE "YOU ARE". HOLY SHIT. WHY DO YOU DO THIS LITERALLY EVERY POST? STOP SAYING "YOUR".
>>7048067
You understand there si a post limit here? and you decided to waste a post, not posting a caption, to simply point out someone is preforming the inane, totally acceptable practice of Posting captions they saved. You don't see how your comment in any way devalues this thread?
>>7048063
>>7048070
Dude, you need to accept that if you don't know how your and you're work then they were right from the start. I'm pretty sure you learn that shit in kindergarten. You claim to have read not just books, but books on how to write. You must see how suspect that seems given your failure to understand the basics of writing in the english language.
>>7048075
wow, you sure are triggered easily. here's a hint, if this is so emotionally distressing, just hide and ignore my posts
>>7048071
but you understood the meaning. and I was only ever talking to you. and I also understood the meaning. so no, the meaning was exactly the same.
>>7048074
You already pointed this out, stop samefagging and wasting posts. I'm not going to change the way I type because it triggers you to see a slight, totally clear grammatical error
>>7048070
Last thread someone was literally shitting it up with some autistic Australian captions and no-one batted an eyelid, you can't win heh. If it triggers the manchildren then please, keep doing what you're doing, ain't no-one else contributing.
>>7048078
stop calling yourself "they". also, stop wasting posts with useless quibbling that has nothing to do with captions in any capacity.
>>7048083
>autistic Australian captions
what the hell does that even mean?
>>7048077
This thread was dead the second you took anon's bait. All we can do now is hope you learn from your mistakes. You weren't ready for posting on 4chan, let alone to write captions. You need to take a huge step backwards and reassess your own opinion of your skills at realizing when you are being baited, and also simple grammar and spelling. They knew you would react like this. You have done exactly what they wanted by getting angry, defensive, and giving them plenty of entertainment. You made the bad choices here. If you can't accept that, this will keep happening, this community will be banned again, and you'll have nowhere to post your "captions" because I doubt any other community would accept someone who reacts the way you do to criticism.
>>7048086
Some anon was butchering caption requests with a stereotypical Australian accent to them.
>>7048084
>telling people to stop doing something because it upsets you
Oh that was smart. I'm sure this will end well.
>>7048086
please stop posting stuff that belongs in aco
>>7048070
>No, you stop. your not posting captions, constantly samefagging, and generally being a non-constructive dick instead of contributing to the thread
Well, that's just objectively wrong. I'm not who you're talking to, and I made like half the captions you've been posting. So take that for what you will.
Just chill out. Not everyone is a samefag. Not everyone is against you. It's not You VS. The World.
All I'm saying is that grammar, punctuation, that kind of thing? That matters. Especially when the entire point of the thread is about writing. So obviously quality is going to matter here more than if you're, say, just texting a friend. And as annoying and persistent as that one anon is being, he has a point, that maybe you should put more effort into your captions.
Again, I agree that this whole thing has gone insanely overboard and is frankly pretty embarrassing for everyone involved. But I'm just saying, y'know?
That's all I have to say about that. I made my two posts. Not gonna engage with this any further.
>>7048091
You must see they're a lost cause by now, right? This is basically the reason most of us left /d/ to begin with.
>>7048087
stop calling yourself anon, its obvious your sameposting.
Here's a tip: if you don't want to make it obvious your same posting, don;t have the exact same opinion in every comment that's supposed to be a different person. in real life, people don;t come into drama and decide to take a side, they just tell people to stop.
so no, I'm going to keep posting and if you want to royally fuck this thread by actively refusing to post captions or anything in any way related to captions, that's on you
>>7048096
you're*
I count six, is that six times? It wouldn't even matter but it's like the objectively wrong use of that word. After you spent so much time arguing about how you can write... only to then prove that you're too lazy to do it right. Do you see how I used "write" and "right" there? They sound the same but here's the tricky part, they're actually two very different words!
>>7048100
Yo dude, mind fucking off the dick mantle for about three minutes to let the bastards learn on their own?
>>7048100
Now a little test. Can you spot the mistakes I made in this post? Go ahead. I genuinely want to see if you can find them.
>>7048089
>>7048088
funny how these are all arriving a minute apart, huh? also, great job on posting one caption.
>>7048089
that's exactly what your doing, tho
>>7048091
>Well, that's just objectively wrong. I'm not who you're talking to, and I made like half the captions you've been posting. So take that for what you will.
Show me five captions I posted that you made.
>It's not You VS. The World.
of course not, its me vs one guy pretending to be the world.
>All I'm saying is that grammar, punctuation, that kind of thing? That matters. Especially when the entire point of the thread is about writing
in the writing? sure. but plenty of great writers have had no idea how to spell. plenty of great writers lived before there was such a thing as standardized spelling.
>So obviously quality is going to matter here more than if you're, say, just texting a friend. And as annoying and persistent as that one anon is being, he has a point, that maybe you should put more effort into your captions.
I do put effort into my captions. he pointed out one spelling error, which spellcheck didn;t catch, in any of my captions
>>7048090
is Dmitrys /aco/ or here?
>>7048095
>if I make a comment in agreeing with someone who shares one opinion with me, it would look like he was agreeing with me on all of my opinions
>>7048081
Dude. You can't fucking spell. They don't assign soldiers missing their legs to run messages. This is quite obviously something you are not capable of doing. It's time to stop. You don't have your own special brand of grammar, theres just correct and incorrect grammar, and yours is incorrect. If you can't write a fucking sentence, you can't fucking write. How autistic do you have to be to still be defending this.
>>7048103
Your not my fucking English teacher, I'm not going to just do assignments for you for no reason. You don't get that.
>>7048100
there is no "objective wrong" in English, the language is not codified, its entirely a matter of opinion. you clearly have no idea what your taking about. stop posting irrelevant, useless, non-caption content on the fucking caption thread
>>7048111
Ok so you can't spot basic errors, and you're saying you refuse to in order to hide that fact or buy time for you to google the answers. Got it.
>>7048107
I spell just fine in all of my captions. I'm not going to sprint full-speed because I decided you needed too do that.
Now, stop posting useless, irrelevant information and post captions in the caption thread
>>7048111
Except for you know, the language institutions, books, the teacher you just admitted to having. But apart from all those no of course the english language is all just a matter of opinion.
>>7048114
to be clear, you do everything anyone tells you unless your incapable of doing it?
>>7048116
Except the ones you posted earlier where someone pointed out all the grammar and spelling mistakes.
>>7048117
>he language institutions, books, the teacher
none of them codify or claim to codify the language. they only describe the language based off of how they find it to be used. you clearly have no fucking idea what your talking about
>>7048118
If I have already claimed I can do something and spent hours arguing that i can do something then yeah, it's kind of telling if you don't at that point. Having trouble on google eh?
>>7048119
all 1 spelling error that I made and a bunch of random bullshit that had nothing to do with spelling?
>>7048121
you're*
7.
>>7048105
>Show me five captions I posted that you made.
Okay:
>>7048007
>>7048025
>>7048048
>>7048053
>>7048063
>>7048084
Now please stop losing your shit. It's obvious you have a spelling and grammar problem. You consistently forget to capitalize letters, as well as mix up "your" and "you're". Anon, you literally just spelled "didn't" as "didn;t".
Again- Not trying to mess up your thing here. I'm just saying, as annoying as you might find that anon, he's still right about one thing: you should probably work on your captions a bit.
>>7048123
you really think i'd be able to post this many files on 4chan but not be able to use google? any one on Earth can just google it, and no doubt if I found errors your response would have been "You just googled it".
so no, not playing that game. but I am posting captions. because this is a caption thread.
>>7048127
>Now please stop losing your shit. It's obvious you have a spelling and grammar problem
not in my captions. I made one actual spelling mistake in any of them.
He's blowing it absolutely out of proportion
>>7048124
The one spelling error*
You're not capable of posting a single fucking thing without an error of some kind... and you STILL haven't found the answers to a basic question, despite being given access the internet. That's a damn shame.
>>7048130
The back-pedaling begins. All hands on deck. Begin damage control procedures. I thought we were all the same guy?
>>7048130
Text alignment, punctuation, grammar, sentence structure, narrative focus, character uniformity, you know those little unimportant things. When have they ever mattered!?
>>7048131
>The one spelling error*
so you do admit there was only one?
>>7048133
he gave me evidence that I was wrong, and as such I changed my opinion. I mean, I obviously should have known since he decided he was posting actual relevant material and you've made it abundantly clear your incapable of doing such.
Now, have you ever actually made a caption?or is grammar the only part of writing you could ever understand? I mean, i get that, most autists can't be creative but can harshly follow arbitrary made-up rules, but still.
>>7048136
those aren't spelling errors. You just wasted ANOTHER post pointing out something useless and irrational
why are you so insistent on ruining this thread?
>>7048138
Theres two in your first caption alone. For fucks sake dude, there's circles around them. It's not hard.
>>7048139
They're not spelling errors so suddenly they magically don't matter? Spelling is the only thing you think has a "correct" form?
>>7048140
1. wasn't my first caption
2. there was only one, and other circles around things that weren't spelling errors.
>>7048103
This is the most autistic thing I've ever seen on 4chan.
Seriously, why do captions and text-heavy threads draw such huge amounts of shitposting? There are so many fucked up fetishes on this board, but words are what trigger people?
Seriously, just fuck off, don't read the thread if you don't like it.
>>7048141
we weren't talking about anything except spelling errors. there was no reason to bring something up besides spelling errors. stop ruining the thread with bullshit
>>7048148
what if shitposting is their fetish?
>>7048145
>kick instead of lick
>your instead of you're
You can't even count to the number two. I seriously feel bad at this point. I'm arguing with someone with low level downs syndrome.
>as if we didn't know that already
>>7048148
While I do appreciate your agreement, I would request you attempt to post either captions or requests with your text, as shitposter has already wasted so many posts
>>7048148
there used to be quality control in these threads, believe it or not
if you're going to scribble all over someone else's art I think it's fair to say you should at least try to do it nicely
>>7048154
word choice=/=spelling
you, apparently, cannot count to one.
>>7048157
are you seriously starting hit with another person? or are you so autistic you think he'll agree with you?
>>7048162
Me and caption-anon, not me and you, you fucking retard.
No, only you would call it important that the text is slightly misaligned
>>7048158
Your and you're are two different words, with different letters in them. This really seems to be the crux of your misunderstanding. These words aren't interchangable. If you spell you're without a ' or an e, and wind up with a different word, you have mispelled "you're". You didn't make a word choice, you fucked up basic spelling. That's like saying you ate shit and it was a nutritional choice and not just, you know, eating shit.
Still up for adding some more captions to the list if anyone has requests
Anotha one? Forced ass worship and as pictured clothes bursting, cheers.
>>7048166
>with different letters in them
"e" is one letter
>misunderstanding.
I understand what your saying, I'm just not going to alter my behavior because your this autistic
>These words aren't interchangable
they are completely interchangable. you are able to completely understand what I'm saying. that is the only reason a word exists, to communicate a message. and you understand the message. so the word use is perfectly fine. anything else is so much autism.
>That's like saying you ate shit and it was a nutritional choice and not just, you know, eating shit.
Its more like eating orca and saying you at dolphin.
>>7048169
you like my first one?
ayy
>>7047795
>requesting, hubby got in deep with the mob, now wifey has to be the one to pay the debt off
Gosh I would love in general anything about a girl who has a debt she couldn't pay (whether it's her's or somebody else's), so she's forced into paying it with her body
Always really gets me going.
request needing someone to help milk her because it becomes unbearable when they swell up with milk this much.
requesting futa mom discovered the son she abused so thoroughly in his childhood became a pro wrestler, and deciding to spend some quality time
>>7048168
>>7048181
are two-part requests acceptable, anon?
>>7048178
possible part 2
you skiped out on milking her, so now they got bigger and shes angry. so now she's going to force feed you.
>>7048173
Sure, ain't no-one else contributing c:
You untsarednd what I'm saying right now, right?
Taht does not mean tihs tpye of thing should be expected or acepted for a caption. Misusing "You're" is scuh a basic thing to fixx, and you really show that you don't crae about the quilaty of yuor caotpins when you cotansntly refus to fix it.
Not to meinton the eye-straining font yuo often use, and the way you don't give a siht about even TRYING to fomrat them itno soethimng redable. You costtnanly break seentences, eevn words, with hyehpns, which fukcs up teh flow of the sen-
-tence. (like that). You forget to calaptiize leettrs. And on and on it geos.
One of these proelbms in a vaucum is not a big dael, but when mixed toegther, it makes a not-so-great caipton.
There's just something so beautiful about a guy constantly saying someone doesn't know what they're talking about when it comes to english, and constantly getting the words and punctuation in that sentence wrong.
>>7048171
>anything else is so much autism
>Caring about the quality of writing is autism in a thread about writing
so if understanding what someone is saying is literally all the matter, y dun w3 all tlk liek thiz? u undrstnd mE wright?
Oh, maybe because it's ball-clenchingly annoying to read someone consistently fucking up basic English?
>>7048171
Screencapping this. Oh boy. I feel like I should be capping the whole thread.
>>7048189
look, man. so far, my captions have consistently met the standards of the people who requested them. I understand you found a problem with one of the captions I posted here. I understand you find the language I use outside of my captions unacceptable for captions.
I do not agree with you. you burned that bridge very early in this thread. please stop responding to me, its abundantly clear no one appreciates your posts and you have no chance of convincing me of anything you mean to communicate
>>7048194
this post has nothing to do with captions. why the fuck is it in a caption thread?
>>7048200
Then why didn't you send them to them directly instead of exposing the whole thread to them and in your words wasting a post? Ask for an email address or something. Don't post it here.
tfw your request will be buried because 2 autists are arguing
>>7048201
I'm not posting my e-mail address on 4chan, and I didn;' waist a post, I posted a caption. on the caption thread. you are posting on the caption thread, but not posting captions. this thread is for posting captions. you should post captions
>>7048200
You know the guy you were originally arguing with is probably long gone right? They'll probably check this thread in a few hours and laugh and then close it. It's obvious from writing and argumentative styles alone that theres a bunch of different people replying to you. But no, like every paranoid hyper defensive autist on 4chan, everyone's the samefag because that's easier to accept than you might be wrong...
>>7048207
I could try to do a request for you, if you want. anything in particular
>>7048211
this is a caption thread, please post captions.
>>7048210
>waist
Wow. And I meant ask THEM for THEIR email newfag. Like most things have worked on /d/ for years. How would you posting your email even work? You send the caption to yourself? You really are fucking retarded.
>>7048200
>you burned that bridge very early in this thread
Oh no, god forbid. What will I do without the respect and admiration of someone who has done nothing but yell at me while I try to help? Who has called me a samefag, said I contribute nothing, and has consistently defended their improper grammar, syntax, and spelling, instead of just owning up to it and trying to improve? I really don't know if I'm going to be able to emotionally handle this rejection.
>its abundantly clear no one appreciates your posts
Your constant posting of my captions would say otherwise.
I would also argue that my captions are of a higher quality than yours, but I suppose that's for the thread to decide. Not that it matters- it's all just captions anyway. They don't really take skill or talent. It's basically just making the most not-awful thing you can with the tools available.
Fuckin'- four replies is already way more effort than I should've given this stupid-ass argument. Sorry for trying to help.
>>7048216
This stopped being a caption thread when it became all about you. Anyone can see that. And reading back, you only ever seem to say "post captions" to avoid having to answer criticism. Wow.
>>7048218
No, your captions are better. That's not something anyone has to decide. It's quite provable.
>>7048217
I'd still be giving out my email to anyone I mailed, its the same thing with one dditional step. also, this is a caption thread, please post captions.
>>7048218
Ok, so why exactly are you talking to me? you admit that you don't care about my opinion. Why are you talking to me at all?
>>7048200
>Autist talks about burning bridges
Kind of an analogy for your life eh?
>>7048223
Never heard of a throw away email? Seriously is this your first fucking day? Mods please if this kid is over 12 i'll eat a fucking shoe.
>>7048219
I didn't make it about me. I post captions while asserting arguments. but I'm still posting captions. this isn't about me, I'm having a conversation while participating in the thread.
Your not, your making it all about me by constantly messaging me and doing nothing to make sure the thread includes actual captions
>>7048220
no its not, its subjective
>>7048225
>>7048229
if your going to reply to the same thread this many times, at least post a caption. this is a caption thread. please post captions
>>7048223
>post captions
>don't force me to accept i'm wrong
>if I say post captions maybe they'll forget the mountain of things I haven't responded to somehow because everyone is as easily distracted as an autist like me
At least he stopped posting his own captions and started posting other stuff.
I'd say that's a win for the thread.
>>7048230
No, your captions are dog shit by any standard compared to theirs. You can't spell. You can't form a sentence. Your narrative is all over the place.
>>7048235
this is a caption thread, please post captions. this argument is over, the thread has a limited number of posts, please stop wasting them with off-topic
>>7048234
do you have any lactation captions?
>>7048240
>>7048235
this is a caption thread, please post captions. this argument is over, the thread has a limited number of posts, please stop wasting them with off-topic
>>7048245
I found pic related, does this tickle your fancy or should I try to find something more specific?
Alright, unless anybody as some last requests to add to the list, I think I'm gonna bust the hell out of this thread. It's gotten a bit too cringey in here. And it seems like no one is actually requesting or posting captions, aside from cringe-anon himself.
Hopefully the next thread (if there IS a next thread) is relatively normal.
>>7048255
these are the ones i requested. hope some one picks them up.
>>7047795
>>7048178
>>7048183
as for those two fags, stay out of the next thread.
https://youtu.be/pQ4fCIEu22Y
>>7048264
Don't think I can do that third one. Maybe the second. Will definitely do the first.
>>7048264
I created three captions for this thread and got sentiments of satisfaction from at least 2 of the requesters. Yeah, that's not much, but it was a lot more on-topic and constructive then anything he made. I'm not the one who became devoted to filling this thread with pointless, caption-free material instead of actually captioning.
>>7048272
thats understandable, but you have to ignore the ones who are just going to drag things like this on. I mean, did anything get accomplished from going back and forth with him?
>>7048277
Obviously not, but what else could I have done? just ignored his insults? he was clearly devoted to trying to offend me at any cost
>>7048272
d-do you have the original image for that one? Full bondage like that an especially sensory deprivation is my fetish.
>>7048281
I actually do not, sorry
>>7048279
look at this pic, thats all he wanted from you.
just recently, on another sight, a guy spammed the comment section and called people names and posted CP links. a look on his profile shows he only made his accont only hours before. we just reported him and ignored him and when he didn't get his (YOU)s he left.
>>7048284
I'll do better next time. I promise. I will ignore trolls
>>7048272
I've been looking for some fate saber stuff like this latel
>>7048284
>"on another sight"
>refuses to capitalize letters
>agree with the captioner
gee I wonder who this is
>>7048279
>what else could I have done? just ignored his insults?
YES. ABSOLUTELY YES. I would love to have lectured him too, but doing so would get me exactly jack-shit, and flood the board with low quality posts.
This sentiment is why a conversation devolves into utter shit. People have to say something, and they usually say what first comes to mind, which is usually complete shit.
When in doubt, follow the rule prison guards follow : If it feels good to say, don't say it.
>>7048295
don't, just say no to (YOU)s.
>>7048281
I wrote the caption...I posted the pics used in the sex suits thread here on /d/ since posting them here doesn't make sense. Hope you find them okay.
>>7048312
thanks, sorry I never got to doing any more
Does anyone have specific preferred fonts? I really love 04b03, which is specifically designed to be used at a size of eight pixels (or multiples thereof), without anti-aliasing. I see it used all the time in captions on alternate-history maps (particularly RvBOMally), but never elsewhere.
Pic related--I retyped >>7048249 in 16-px 04b03.
>>7048338
I did one of them
>>7048312
I did another
>>7048312
I did a third
>>7048460
any specific pathos in mind? fetishes/limits? or just do what feels natural?
>>7048466
hmm, guess I did miss some stuff the first time through, I'll make sure to read through twice from now on
I will make the next thread and when I do can we ignore the autists fighting and report them?
>>7048489
glad to hear someone likes them! any more requests? I may do one or two more tonight, will try to do better.
>>7048495
well do you have any image with 2 demons and a male? i could probably make that kind of narrative out of any such image.
>>7048500
Well, it's a demon and an angel, but this is the closest I could find.
>>7048540
aight, any preferences beyond that or should I just use my discretion?
>>7048544
Eh, just use your discretion, but a bit of cattiness between the two while they're trying to seduce the guy would be great.
>>7048540
this is a horrible pic
>>7048551
I know. It was the only one I could find though, all the other ones were either shemales fucking the guy or two human girls worshipping a demon's cock. This was the only one that was close enough.
It hurts.
>>7048540
>>7048578
Noice. [spoiler]I'm rooting for the angel.[/spoiler]
>>7048486
Remember: It takes at least two people to start an autistic internet fight: The bait, and the idiot that bites it. (And then further idiots who jump in to argue with the latter)
If you're feeling frustrated or even offended, or the guy you're responding to seems to be the densest, most pointless motherfucker on the Internet, you are almost certainly part of the problem as much as they are. Do not respond. Do not try to get the last year. Resist even the urge to post a "this is bait" meme or other meta comment demonstrating your cleverness in recognizing a troll.
Remember, kids, Pepe says: Only YOU can prevent shitposting.
>>7048588
thanks. any more requests? may do one or two more tonight. also, why the angel, if I may ask?
>>7048598
can you do a mind control caption?
>>7048605
anything more specific? personality, pathos, implied/planned activities, etc?
>>7048598
Eh, I don't know, angels always seemed more motherly, for some reason. Plus, the idea of an angel outfucking a demon just seems hilarious to me, like some kind of cosmic irony.
As for another request...hm, let me find an actually good image before I make a request.
>>7048610
give her a huge ego and make her partner desperate for sex due to mind control.
>>7048624
dialogue, then?
>>7048625
demon appearing in the guys bedroom and having sex with him for nourishment
>>7048598
>>7048617
Found something. I think for this, it should be less dominant and more..mutually addictive? As in, he's becoming addicting to drinking her milk and fucking her and she's becoming addicted to him drinking her milk and fucking her. Maybe it should start out as her acting dominant before she eventually loses control and they both go crazy. That'd be fun.
>>7048637
so all this is happening in like, a few minutes?
>>7048605
>>7048617
>>7048624
I tried
Requesting dominant micro on submissive macro fun. It would get my mind off all this bullshit. Doesn't anybody get the wisdom in not responding?
>>7048279
How is someone telling you you are wrong a personal insult? They said you don't know enough english to write captions well and then you clearly demonstrated exactly that.
>>7047802
Pretty good, though momdom is gonna be done to vanilla by the time this thread archives.
>>7048714
I need more futa momdom in my life. There isn't enough of it.
>>7047921
I came/10
>>7048561
I've got your back, my dude.
>>7048578
Yellow text on a white background is fuckin' gross.
>>7048745
Be careful. Some people can't handle being criticized.
>>7047669
Futa dom
Hey let's get this stuff back on track.
I wanna make captions and am totally up for any requests people want but anyone got any font recommendations? I dunno what to use but I know I don't wanna use like, times new roman or some shit
>>7048853
>>7048883
Look through the captions you see in these threads that aren't being ridiculed to shit. Copy the styles they use.
Bad examples of text:
>>7048249
>>7048578
Good examples of text:
>>7048272
>>7048264
The most important thing is to make sure the text is visible and legible. Don't put dark text on a dark colored background for example.
As for font, pick a font which looks good in bold, as that's the best way to ensure a good balance of text at most resolutions. Harsh lettering doesn't translate well into small boxes, so pick rounded lettering.
>>7048463
Have the milf be assertive and slightly dominant and the boy be a nervous virgin type. Other than that whatever feels natural!
>>7048884
What a shitty story
>>7048643
Thank you
>>7048474
If you had said that earlier, this community would be better off, you fucking autist. Good job ruining the thread.
>>7048940
What can I say, it's all I had saved. Never found any good stuff for futadom.
>>7048643
Love how he's started to say you are instead of your. That's almost as funny as watching them throw a shitfit. How hard is it to copy and paste you're from the hundred times it was mentioned in this thread.
Hey guys, can someone post that one image with Hinata from Naruto and the caption narrating how it's actually Sasuke posing as her for reasons and how he's come to accept being a wife and all that stuff?
I remember it from a couple years ago and made dick=diamonds, but it seems i didn't have the wits to save it at the time
could someone caption with will, incest, sister domination and other aggressive dommy type stuff
plz and thank you
>>7048745
>>7048889
ist das besser?
>>7049012
as in one domming the other, or both domming viewer?
>>7049062
No.
>>7048647
not entirely sure if this is what your looking for, if you come back to this thread tell me?
>>7049103
Fucking awesome, thanks a lot!
>>7049103
Enjoy your ban.
Caption with korra here :3
I don't remember the last time I saw any thread fill up this fast on /d/. What the hell happened here?
>>7049297
A sperg fell for bait, defended very stupid ideas, got BTFO.
>>7049297
You obviously didn't see /gfd/ in it's dying days. They were filling threads in ~6hrs with their autism.
>>7049186
looking for anything in specific?
>>7049162
heh, really think so? any big critiques? want me to try out any more for ya? I'd love to combine momdomme with
>muscle
>Futa
>gay person sexually assualted/raped by women
>lesbians
>combative story/athletic humiliation
>>7048745
interesting, do you want another caption for that one?
>>7048175
this one wasn't sexy enough. i resolve to rewrite it completely. please expect good things!
>>7049360
I liked it as it is, but i'm looking forward to the new and improved version, because you actually put in some effort into your writing.
>>7049338
Not that anon, but a dickgril mother deciding to keep her teenage son safe from conniving, duplicitous high school girls by convincing him that cock is better than pussy would be pretty nifty.
As an alternate twist, a shemale "mother" trying to protect his daughter from predatory boys making the daughter's boyfriend a cock addict could also be neat.
>>7049186
well thats the first time I seen a pic like THAT. now i want MOAR
>>7049392
alright, I think I can do that, currently forming a script in my mind. any big fetishes to include or limits to avoid? besides including incest and cock addiction, of course.
I was thinking a demeaning, powerful mother who still thinks of her son as totally beneath her, but loves him and gently convinces him its for the best...sound about like what you want? or shoudl I go a different direction?
>>7049438
Well, gentle isn't really my thing, but I'll admit I'm curious how that conversation would actually work.
Other than that me flipflopping on that point, the rest sounds good. Thanks, anon.
>>7049420
Docking, POV, or POV docking?
>>7049443
do you want dialogue or monologue? or monologue with line breaks where the viewer can fill in his own parts of the conversation?
>>7049335
Dom saying how small your cock is she can use her monster cock on yours as a French tickle all that kinda jazz
>>7049446
I tend to prefer monologue. The line breaks thing sounds interesting.
>>7049461
How is this?
Requesting a caption for this.
>>7049444
I like pov in general but that pic just added this "docking" thing to the list of sub likes.
>>7049596
When there is another thread, I shall post it.
>>7048096
engrish alert
Bum for more captions themed around robots, cyborgs, and machines in general.
>>7050537
*Bump
Damned autocorrect.
It didn't work in the other thread so I hope it works here...
Can someone make a caption of this? I really like Camilla from FE if so I was hoping if any of you were generous enough to do so. I'd like the setting to be in a steamy hot spring with plenty of breast feeding and a handjob. Sorry if this seems like a lot, it's just that it's my first time around this place so I decided to poke around here for a request.
new thread when?