Flattening/Flattened

File: 1467141197301.png (780KB, 1800x1500px) Image search: [Google]

780KB, 1800x1500px

why was the previous thread deleted?

>>6935407
probably because the content was deviating too much like this

>>6935760
It's a flattening / shape change image what kind of reason is that?

>>6935760
That's what I thought too...but most threads just get archived, not deleted when they get too big.

I'm beginning to wonder if one of the mods has decided to play villain with us.

The Redflare500 image that was used for the OP of last thread was definitely a little on the bizarre side, and almost looked more like it belonged in the inanimate transformation thread.

My own rule of thumb for picking an OP image is to start off with one of Japanese origin, and is both sexually suggestive (either nude, or within a sexual enough context) and well done. Ideally something that, for the people who see it that don't have this fetish, could make them think "hey, I can almost understand the appeal!" instead of "wow that's the dumbest thing I've ever seen."

This OP picture is good, but a little bit too plain and simplistic. It grabs attention, but not in the right way, since in the catalogue thumbnail it's pretty much two circles.

And since OP didn't care to pad out the thread with more content, or go with the agreed upon title, I made a proper thread here:
>>6935408