So, uh.. Is this canon to the MCU?
>>95186314
Yes, unless movies say otherwise.
>>95186314
I'm so glad they didn't make it a movie because now I don't have to watch it in order to get a full mcu story
>>95186314
No, Marvel Entertainment shows are not canon to Marvel Studios movies. Inhumans, AoS, Netflix are all non-canon.
>>95186671
this and movies never talk about tv shows so it's safe to say it's canon and always will be
>>95186913
hard to tell because Wheedon tried to dispute Agents of Shield as uncanon despite starting the show in the first place.
>>95186314
>literally x-men with a different name
>>95186314
Yes
>>95186768
Fuck you, stop spreading lies
>>95186314
Is it any good? Should I watch this in a movie theater?
>>95187035
>>95187924
Why does AOS have some tie in episodes for MCU movies though
>>95187924
>one director said one thing once
This is on the level of the retards claiming that the Thor movies have zero magic in them because of the Dark World director's commentary.
>>95187069
It's AMAZING! Blackbolt doesn't need Medusa to talk for him anymore!
>>95187069
Just wait for TV and the obligatory weekly /co/ roasting threads.
>>95187995
It's a one way canon. The movies are canon to the shows, not the other way around. Since we're this far into the MCU and none of the films mentioned the shows it's safe to say they're not canon.
It's like how the Dragon Ball manga is canon to the Xenoverse games but the games still aren't part of the main canon.
>>95188018
He wasn't really a 'director.'
More like a seat warmer for Favreu
>>95188253
it doesnt work this way. If the movies contradict the shows, then it will be non cannon. Now they are canon, yet not SUPER CANON like that autist some years before said.
The Helicarrier of AoU came from the AoS show.
>>95186314
Is that Ramsey Snow on the right?
>>95188347
its me on the right!
yeah its ramsey.
>>95186314
Movies are canon for the tv shit but the MCU don't give a fuck about the TV, that's why next in AoS will be S.W.O.R.D. with all the Thanos and the galactic stuff
>>95188347
Yeah.
Someone drank from the wrong Grail of future projects, huh?
>>95188300
It's kinda hard to contradict something you don't even acknowledge.
>The Helicarrier of AoU came from the AoS show.
It came from Nick Fury having a backup one somewhere. Agents of Shit just wanted to cash in on it and say "w-we helped!". The movie doesn't even acknowledge AoS
>>95186314
It really doesn't matter, neither will ever, ever reference the other.
Notice how the Netflix shows don't even namedrop "the incident" or "the big green guy" anymore? They've accepted that there will never be any interaction.
>>95186314
>Is this canon to the MCU?
No.
Why would you think so?
>>95186768
this is not accurate at all. they're all tied together, the only reason why there's a separation is cost.
the movie actors are too expensive to be involved with the tv show and the netflix shows.
AoS did manage to get sif and nick fury on their show, so cannon.
stark and hulk also mentioned in the netflix series, and they had a proto captain america/nuke
in the end the movies are the biggest pay day so they take the lead and priority as to where the stories in the universe go, the other two just follow along while netflix is a tiny bit more independent.
>>95189340
>#ItsAllConnected
Marvel shill, please.