Serious question, would A Scanner Darkly be considered /co/ material or would it be /tv/
I'm mainly divided because it looks some parts were animated while others cel shaded actors.
Also did you like the film?
>>95181998
The movie is fucking awesome, the book is depressing as fuck
>>95181998
It's rotocoped my dude. Should be fine here.
>>95181998
Kafka?
>>95182079
>book is depressing
>not the movie
NIGGA
https://youtu.be/AewSwHcNvGw
>>95182283
>rotoscope
Truly the pinnacle of animation.
Might as well post a few iconic clips from the film
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaNaw63H9_c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTVeJfzFCTY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhsbXxQ4tOc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kaLLy-U8MkI
>>95182670
When I saw this movie as a teenager I remember thinking it was just footage ran though a filter. Looking at these clips now, though, I see this massive mix of rotoscoping, 3D animation, and tweening. Little things like a background being a static image, or the highlight moving across something as a constant shape and not a jittery redraw. It's actually pretty visually interesting.
One of my favorite movies, made me interested in seeing more woody harlson, RDJ, and keanu movies.
>>95182079
Did you not see the ending?
>>95182404
That webm isn't rotoscoped though
>>95182079
The movie is almost verbatim from the book, just with one character removed and a few scenes trimmed or put in a different order. They're so similar that the few significant changes they make seem jarring if you've read the book before, like how Barris going to the police happens way earlier.
>>95182079
One thing I didn't like about the movie is that it cut a lot of the incidental conversations Bob had with his friends about random bullshit like sneaking drugs across the border by making a hash golem. Those were all great; like half of the scenes in the book could be adapted into an Achewood comic and nobody would notice a difference.