So, the Venom movie is gonna suck isn't it?

>>94928263
When has something Venom related NOT sucked?

>implying it'll even get made

>>94928263
>Penis Parker
Not even Agent Venom could save it

File: chad-1.jpg (62KB, 590x687px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 590x687px

>>94928263
Yes if they cannot find a blond hunky white guy to properly cast him

>>94928263
>Sony
Yup.

>>94928263
>it's an artist draws Venom with toes episode
gross

Not into R rated stuff usually, so I dunno. Maybe, maybe not.

One way or the other, it'll get blown out of proportion here. That's about the only sure thing.

>>94928819
Where did this come from?

File: 3acd31893b-1486718726858.jpg (52KB, 600x593px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 600x593px

>>94928299
>When has something Venom related NOT sucked?
Try reading comics ya faggot

>>94928263
Fuck you dude it's going to be dope. Fuck you!

Sony only makes top quality films.

>>94929533
People still praise Spider-Man 1 and 2 as being the greatest of all time, so please end this meme

I don't even agree with those people but let's stop pretending Sony only produces bad movies

>>94929566
>two great movies from 15 years ago from a long since gone director and everything Spider-man since those first two that they made on their own was shit.
>They're entire plans for the Amazing Spider-man Cinematic Universe were pure trash.
>The company behind such /hits/ in recent years as Pixels, Angry Birds, Paul Blart, Female Ghostbusters, Emojis, the Smurfs series and the guaranteed to be terrible new Jumanji

Baby Driver and letting Marvel make Spider-man are the only two things they've done right in the last few years.

>>94929686
their*

>>94928263
>described as a R-Rated horror movie
>starring the big guy himself
I really, really want to believe that this is going to be good and that it can be good. We really need more movies with cape characters that actually go for different genres and aren't just "superhero films".

But
>Sony
Tells me this is just going to be a shitshow if it even gets made.

If it does I just hope they take some inspiration from Truth In Journalism

>>94928263
Probably. But will it suck as much as the current comics?

>>94929686
>and letting Marvel make Spider-man are the only two things they've done right in the last few years.

You liked Homecoming more than any other iterations
Your opinion is invalid

>>94930087
How do the current comics suck, I'd like to hear your opinion

>>94928819
>>94929280
>Where did this come from?

Anyone?

File: 1434747744790.gif (2MB, 371x500px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 371x500px

>>94929942
>>starring the big guy himself

File: Screenshot_7.jpg (209KB, 609x929px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 609x929px

Don't you worry. They know exactly what Venom
movie needs.

>>94930124
>blind homecoming hate
>thinks current marvel isn't trash
wew

>>94931124
>blind homecoming hate
Hey, it's not his fault the only good Spider-Man movies were Raimi's 1 and 2.

>>94931098
Honestly Venom has had plenty of cheeky adventures, I don't see anything particularly wrong with that issue, it wouldn't be the first time lovable oaf Eddie teamed up with little kids

>>94931124
>>blind homecoming hate
It's not blind, it's based on the things it did wrong, but sure, assume that

>>94931140
Neither of those got any of the characters right either, only thing they did better was seem like coherent films but they still butchered the source material in every way

>>94931672
>butchered the source material

That's kind of not the point and not the problem. They don't have to be slaves to what was done first just 'cause it was.

This is why we can never have nice things or new and different things. Ever.

>>94931801
>take a character
>run it through the pleb normie filter
>end up with a caricature
>get called out on it
>"y-you're just afraid to try anything different!"
Literally the "it's just MY STYLE" defense. No, reduction of a character to a collection of popular misconceptions does not constitute a bold new take.

>>94931855
>I don't like it so it's bad
Fuck off.

>>94929942
>modern horror movies
>good
Yeah, no. This will be a trainwreck from start to finish.
>b-but muh Babadook, muh shitty Evil Dead remake
All terrible and a sign that the genre is going down the drain.

All Sony had to do was fucking wait and then fit Venom into the MCU, and trade off with a Spider-Man movie one year and Venom movie the next.

>>94932362
>I like it so its good
Not an argument sweetie

>>94929280
>Sony
>Original origin to Venom and a more than likely rushed Carnage as well.

>>94929942
>Director of zombie land

Future looks bleak.

I cant believe they are going to make a venom movie without Spiderman in it. How do you even DO that origin story? I mean his look is derived from Spidermans costume for christs sake/

>>94932434
>I don't like it so it's bad
Not argument either. Wanna go full circle or actually use any actual arguments instead of "N-NOT MUH" and "WAHH MUH SOURCE MATERIAL RUINED ;_;"

>>94928299
Remender's Agent Venom. That's it, basically.

>>94931801
>This is why we can never have nice things or new and different things. Ever.

We have different things literally all the time, what are you talking about? It usually sucks

>>94932545
Nah Agent Venom sucked

>>94932414
You honestly believe Marvel could do a good Venom movie?

The only decent Marvel movies have been Incredible Hulk, Iron Man, Avengers, and the Cap movies

That leaves more shit films than good ones regardless of what drones and critics say, they do not have a good track record.

>>94932671
>Agent Venom sucked
Nice """""argument""""", contrarian.

>>94932545
You are correct.

The character has languished largely without purpose since the first arc.

>>94931098
Cringe