Why Carl Barks was obsessed with ducks? Was it a sex thing?
>>94926997
I mean, it's just weird.
No. Ducktits, however, is a sex thing.
>>94926997
he's a man of taste.
>>94927018
whats weird is seeing him do somewhat human anatomy
with duck bills
>>94926997
>>94927018
what the fuck
Ain't nothing with sexy ducks
>>94926997
Carl Barks created comics about Donald Duck and is the creator of Scrooge McDuck.
He just went too far into the deep end.
>>94927158
They don't even have webbed feet, or tail feathers, or any other classic Disney approximation of duck anatomy. They're literally all just humans with duck bills, which somehow makes it tremendously more off-putting.
>>94927414
>>94927158
>>94926997
>>94927018
I can already tell this thread is off to a good start
>>94926997
I think I found a picture of him in his younger days
>>94926997
It's always a sex thing with artists. Always.
>>94926997
According to Barks himself, he had just drawn too many ducks, and could not find any attraction to humans anymore.
>>94927230
you mean what the duck
>>94928550
Got any real quotes?
>>94927499
No, that's horrifying because the feathers at the edge of the beak there get mistaken for skin.
Skin in that pattern and color looks like a half-healed wound.
Honestly if that was fixed and the soft corners of the beak were still recognizably expressive, that would be cute.
>>94928859
Drawn by Barks himself concerning his problem.
>>94928550
I wonder if that happens to the mlp artists
>>94927230
Google Duckomenta
>>94930575
Omg its real.
One of the most successful furries in history before furries were a thing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VeTyGHE8PM now I have this stuck playing in my mind.
>>94930653
But ducks don't have fur! Don't you mean a fethery?
>>94926997
It was his signature. He could draw humans, but noone was interested till he drew that duckbill on.
He was caught in his fame of drawing ducks. And maybe he lost his ability to draw humans.
>>94930692
>>94930653
Than he was an avianist?
>>94929207
I get the right image, but what does the left imply? He draws ducks as sexy woman, he sees them as sexy?
>>94931046
The first image says that he wants to draw sexy women rather than the ducks they hired him to draw.
The second image says that he's unable to quit drawing ducks after all his years at Disney, and he can't help but draw sexy duck women at this point.
>>94931173
I guess he got caught in the american business. I wonder what would happened if he worked at european disney or comic industry instead.
What if Carl Barks is the reason we have so many furries? ^^
But he could draw non-ducks. But i guess noone wanted his humans but only ducks.
He was an pin-up artist traped in a duck.
>>94931714
> Duck Tails
woo-hoo
can someone post again OP's image?
>>94932376
Problem is, it has nipples like all in the sheik series. And today the mod is not generous.
>>94932541
I was expecting a weird furry porn and it was the most casual of all pics, sometimes mods on co dont have anny sense...
>>94932376
It was Carl Barks' oil painting "The Caliph of Baghdad" (1978). Looks like it got deleted because it has duck tits.
>>94932620
>"The Caliph of Baghdad" (1978)
thank you anon
>>94932620
do you know more... names of works of this artist with interesting... females?
>this thread
>>94932799
Yeah.
http://www.barksbase.de/english/bbh.htm
Click "Non-Disney paintings".
The images on that site are very tiny though. It's better to look up the names of the paintings there and search bigger versions elsewhere.
>>94933126
thank you anon, this guy never made adult comics/books or at least comics with erotical content?
>>94933275
Not really. Carl Barks is famous for his Disney duck comics. He created characters like Scrooge McDuck, Magica De Spell, Beagle Boys, and so on. The smut he drew is much less important than the clean family comics he made. And I don't think he ever drew smutty comics. The most daring and rebellious thing he ever did in a comic was probably drawing a small handful of background characters that had human faces, rather than the dog-faces that Disney characters are supposed to have.
>>94926997
Did he make more money drawing duck people or normal people? There's your answer.
>>94933126
shit after research of some images I cant find bigger ones, it seems it are very obscure and lost with the time
>>94931642
Wow, that's like, really fucking good.
>>94933826
What are you talking about, there's nary a duckbill or dog nose among them!