Is this accurate /co/?

>>94907740
Are you a bot, OP.

>>94907740
>Using real/fake as driscriptions on subjective things like media
real and fake can only be applied to objective things with ridged definitions like food, building supplies and gemstones. Who ever made this is going through that stage in their life where they think old stuff is better than the new stuff.

>>94907759
But this is true?

>>94907776
no

>>94907776
It can't be true 'cause nobody uses these words to describe such things. It's like asking "is the sky triangular?"

What the fuck is this?

We bare bears is cute though

Rabbits is more cartoon than stuff like Batman.

>>94907740
What is this, lazy bait for ants?
Also, a "fake" cartoon is what, exactly? Wouldn't that imply that it's not actually animated? So Clutch Cargo isn't a real cartoon, motion comics aren't real cartoons, but TTGO is. Just because something is shit doesn't mean it doesn't qualify as a cartoon.
In summation, fuck you and your lazy thread.

>>94908012
A Famicon bait thread