Explain This

In the current year you need a black female lead that will have a stunt double be murdered on set or your movie is a failure

File: cat laugh.jpg (38KB, 450x450px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 450x450px

>>94896597
I honestly can't.

1- Did they change anything in the translation?

2- Higher standards?

3- Shit taste?

>>94896597
Propably just an awful dub. Shitty dubs usually lead to stuff like that.

The average rating on the left was 5.7
The average rating on the right was 4.8

That's not really that big of a difference.

>>94896597
>Reddit tomatoes
There's your problem.

Probably a bad dub like the one guy said. You'll note the average score only dropped a little, less than a point. So my guess is the distribution was very on the edge of fresh/rotten and some issue such as the dub pushed people's scores lower.

Also, possibly just the set of reviewers for each film. If they are different people there is no particular reason to expect the same output.

>>94896706
>>94896808
Same thing happened with Doogal, right? The American version got overall lower scores.

>>94896924
>Doogal
Wasn't just a voice problem. They completely rewrote the line and added in tons of unnecessary pop culture references that had aged like milk before the movie even premiered.

Who cares, the movie was shit

>subs vs dubs
What is this? /a/?

>>94897102
In the case of major motion pictures, not TV shows, American execs always load the cast up with name actors to try to get more people to see it. Even though there's no reason to believe that ever works.

>5.7/10
>4.8/10
Percentages don't mean shit beyond "What percentage of people didn't hate it" not actual quality.
Critically they've both been received the same extremely mediocre reception, the only difference is Europe was a bit more forgiving but not much.

>>94897219
But one is fresh and one is rotten. Therefore the fresh one means that version is good and the rotten one means that version is bad.

Scores don't matter. It's the Tomato that matters.

>>94897330
Tomato score is fucked and stupid. You can write a review that a says "The movie is mediocre and unintresting" and can be either Fresh or Rotten because it's based purely on a "Did you hate it or like it" similarly to a thumbs up or a thumbs down which is a stupidly flawed system and the sort of shit you put to confuse people like when Netflix did it so their original content that get low reviews won't be seen as bad.

Ain't nothin' gonna stop me from watching this.

>>94897385
Its not really that bad of a system. The entire point is if its something you can burn 2 hours on or not. Rotten means no, fresh means yes. Obviously it changes a bit depending on your personal preferences. There are plenty of people that love objectively shitty movies and get bored as sin at movies most people would consider genuinely amazing, but still. The whole point is to make a clear indicator of how watchable something is.

>>94897385
It's a good bar for a pass/fail as in the odds of worth the cost to see it. It was never intended to be used as a measure of the film's quality.

>>94896962
Exact same guy is responsible for Ballerina's unnecessary localisation as Doogal.

>>94896962
>>94897724
>>94896924
>Doogal
God that movie was awfully good.
As in, so awful, it's a good watch. Probably due to the 'we didn't give a fuck' dub.

>>94896597

Should have just exported the original version.