https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVkDrIacHJM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRl2OlyNMuc
We had an interesting thread on /a/ about the progress of the various technique.
Other saccarine but very well made examples:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R04WbmalN6k
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFfsTeExwbQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rZtxd0CT_g
KInda choppy but very interesting take on the tecnique. Impressive for a tv series
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UQ33WBtOavQ
Best one
>>94846059
Green girl could work in a horror movie
>>94846148
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhGjCzxJV3E
>>94846059
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prGqE6T2JAs
>>94846148
Well it's definitely not 3d since they are drawing on top of a 3d silhouette but maybe you meant the background?
>>94846350
I liked the hybrid animation yes
>>94846037
Can't really say there's many cartoons that can do this... I can tell when they add something 3D into it so...
>>94846148
I always wondered how this clip manages to be so smooth and Disney-esque. It's a mixed method which is nice.
>>94846185
This is about the only one where it looks really good.
>>94846400
The disney one use a lot of the tecnology from Paper man plus a lot of hand tweaking to streach the character in some specific prospective
>>94846400
It's not about fooling someone into thinking it's 2d (bar the GG one) it's about the abilty to traslate a 2d style convincingly in 3d
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMGXq9_IQBQ
All background are on 3d. Still look bad in my opinion
>>94846497
>DISNEY
>TRESURE PLANET OF ALL
>BAD LOOKING
>I politely disagree
>>94846430
Got any source in that? seems interesting
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4tNuM9XttM
like tears in the rain