Wonder Woman movie tops 800 million dollars

>>94787106
That makes it the #1 superhero origin film right?

File: 75368566.jpg (15KB, 154x160px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 154x160px

>>94787106
It feels pretty damn good to be a Wondy fan these days.

>>94787106
More profit than BvS!

>>94787151
No, that's Raimi Spider-Man.

>>94787106
Haven't seen it yet but I hope this encourages DC to put more comic book content out there on the Silver Screen.

>>94787106
Wonderful.

>>94787255

No she past it.

Wonder Woman is #1

>>94787349
*passed

>>94787349
Domestically, not worldwide.

>Wonder Woman
>Worldwide: $800,008,376

>Spider-Man
>Worldwide: $821,708,551

>>94787397

Ah well. still has Japan

File: Wonder Woman V2006 #605 - Odyssey, Part 5_ Runaway Fate (2011_1) - Page 21.jpg (1MB, 1988x3056px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1988x3056px

>>94787187
Good times are here, my friend.

>>94787526

Why does that kids shirt say Mom?

>>94787574
It shows to other women that he's already his mom's sexual property.

>>94787106
How SEETHING will mousecucks be when Captain Marvel's movie doesn't come anywhere close to Wonder Woman's numbers?

I thought the movie was fine after GotG2 being shit__, but seeing these numbers after a full year of /co/ predicting it was going to make less than Catwoman is the best part of it all

>>94787106

She's been a part of the trinity for decades. There was a Trinity comic book featuring the three of them a decade ago, just as there is one in Rebirth. There was a prestige format 'near Elseworld' time mini featuring the three of them that was also called Trinity in 2003.

She's been continuously published, without interruption, since the Golden Age. The oldest Marvel/Timely characters cannot say that, given that Namor hasn't been published continuously for most of his history and hasn't even been in a team book for most of history, Captain America has huge gaps and wasn't even Steve Rogers for some of those runs, and the original Torch has been non-existent for most of his history.

>>94787151
>>94787255
>>94787397

Domestic is what those things get measured as. Sony Pictures made most of their money from the box office gross on any of their Spider-Man pictures from the North America box office, as is the case with Disney/Buena Vista and Warner Brothers.

However, to be fair, the first Raimi SM would inflation adjust higher. The point of that would be ticket sales, butts in seats. Especially since the first trilogy didn't have those 3D sales.

All that notwithstanding, it's still an impressive achievement. Raimi had a bit more of a track record as a director than Patti Jenkins and Spider-Man probably had more popular culture currency in 2000 than Wonder Woman can reasonably claim a year ago.

>>94787779
What he means is that Wonder Woman, sales wise, hasn't been one of DC's biggest properties like she was in the Golden Age for a very long time. So you've had a lot of people for the past 20 or so years saying that she doesn't deserve to be there, that Flash should be there, or Green Lantern in the Johns years, etc.

This right now has finally shut those people up.

>>94787397
don't forget to count in inflation. Wondy has no chance to pas it

>>94787106
>She finally proved her right to be part of DC trinity
She'd need an Oscar like Donner Superman and Burton Batman. It's coming.

>>94787857
>Spider-Man probably had more popular culture currency in 2000 than Wonder Woman can reasonably claim a year ago.

No probably about it. Spider-Man is Marvels biggest character by far after all

>>94787526

I don't get why he's saying 'un-statute?'

>>94787918

Inflation is meaningless and the legitimate sites that provide that data generally offer it only for dollars (so e.g. it's domestic based). On that basis, Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2 both beat A LOT of other movies, adding an extra near $215 M to it's domestic gross (for the original movie). Only the Marble team up (and then only the original) Avengers inflation adjusts higher.

But again, Avengers has Imax and 3D.

A much fairer way to really compare anything (and I'd still agree that Spider-Man would be ahead of many other films) would be tickets sold, since that means actual butts in seats, discounting whether it's a 3D theater, etc.

>>94788119
It's a stupid thing from JMS's shitty run, of which that's the only good page. She's an "un-statue" because she's a "golem" formed from clay.

>>94788207
no, if I had to choose one, then revenue is way better than raw units. (the real best would simply be both.) for example, some borderline interested customer is only willing to pay the matinee price for a movie, and would be a lost sale if you tried to charge full price. That should count as half a sale, in the same way I max counts as double.

It's like comparing VIP concert tickets to nosebleeds.

>>94788287
>JMS run
>shit
Please, it was pedestrian at the very worst.

File: tumblr_osfpkdwKYK1vvev2to8_250.gif (1MB, 250x137px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 250x137px

Steve was the best part of the movie. Wonder Woman was truly the first cape movie to get romance right, other than maybe Raimi's Spiderman.

I will never watch it

>>94787255
In raw numbers, yes. But adjusted for ticket price inflation and especially considering budget it's Superman 1. Its $301 million gross equates to nearly $1.2 billion today. With $510 million domestic.

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=superman.htm&adjust_yr=2017&p=.htm

>>94788754
idk, MoS and BvS has had a pretty great romance between Clark and Lois for me. The way she can see past the powers and the Supermaness and just loves him for trying to do right, and how she is actually trying to help and do things instead of just be a victim/goal for the protag. I guess Trevor shared a lot of those same aspects--he saw past WW's godliness to her true flawed self that was struggling with man's world and loved her because of that.

>>94787349
No she didn't.

Adjusted for inflation those movies made over a billion each.

>>94788938
>MoS and BvS has had a pretty great romance between Clark and Lois for me
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

B-but Wonder Woman was a mess! Insiders told me so!

>>94787106

why is this drawing dated year 3013?

>>94789364
One of the Legionnaires drew it, clearly.

WW might actually end up similarly profitable to Avengers 2.5 at this point, accounting only for the ticket sales at least.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/robcain/2016/04/06/was-the-400-million-warner-bros-paid-for-batman-v-superman-a-good-investment/#665b0c9f2fb8

Let's crunch some numbers. BVS had a production budget of $250 million and marketing budget of $165 million (2/3 production costs). Civil War had the same production budget (net, not gross) so it's fair to say the marketing budget was similar as well. Civil War would therefore cost $415 million. If WW's budget was proportionally similar, then at a $149 million production budget it would cost $100 million to market for a total cost of $249 million. That seems right for a blockbuster movie in the $140-150 million budget range, and matches other figures I've seen.

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&id=marvel2016.htm
Civil War made $408 million domestic, $180 million in China, and $565 million everywhere else, for a total of $1.153 billion worldwide. Applying the Forbes research above:

25% of 180m = 45m
42% of 565m = 237m
52% of 408m = 171m
453 - 415 = $38 million (before home video and TV revenues)

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=wonderwoman.htm
Wonder Woman made $405 million domestic, $90 million in China, and $305 million everywhere else. Probably will hit $410m domestic and $315 everywhere else but China by the time it's done in a couple weeks, if only because of Japan. Maybe a couple million more in China too.

25% of 92m = 23m
52% of 410m = 213m
42% of 310m = 130m
366 - 249 = $117 million (before home video and TV revenues)

Civil War likely has a lot more in the way of interest cost, talent participation cost, etc. as well. in total it'll probably be a bit more profitable than WW when home video sales and TV revenues are considered. But they're very much comparable.

>>94789537
Thank you.

Just shows what you can do when your budget isn't completely out of control and you focus on making a movie that's enjoyable by all rather than one that "appeals" to all while cross-advertising all your other movies.

>>94789143
what a quality response.

>>94788957

>m..m..muh Inflation

>>94788957
m8, its clear that we aren't counting inflation in this scenario.

>>94789642
So basically, the WW movie is the film studio equivalent to Bravely Default. Though admittedly, it was way funnier when Square Enix did it, cause they were actually surprised by the whole thing.

>>94787632
I snarf'd.

>imagine how much solo Batman and Flash movies could make if done properly
>imagine all the hype about JL if all solo movies were done BEFORE it
Fucking WB wanted fast money, now JL will be happy with pathetic 1 bil.

>>94789841
>implying it matters
Dude, they want to do a fuckin' Flashpoint movie for fucks sake. Flashpoint.

Right after they built up plenty of good will with Wondy's solo picture, they decide to do a story that portrays her as basically the extreme opposite of what made audiences like the character.

Like, WB has pulled some truly boneheaded moves before, but holy shit, it's like they want to create a PR nightmare.

>>94789949
>BvS Wonder Woman is a battle hungry cynical bitch
>Audiences love her being badass and not believing in mankind
>Solo Wonder Woman is all lovey lovey except when she isn't
>Audiences love her being all lovey lovey and believing in mankind and contradicting BvS

I will have to tell you again: people don't give a shit about Wonder Woman's characterization.
If she was a ballbuster, all these faggots in the comic industry that complain about her being violent in the comics would praise it, and everything would be about how "badass" she was, and nothing would change.

That's how DCAU Wonder Woman is still popular.

>>94789537
Let's continue this line. Forbes says that BVS had "$30 million for talent guild residuals and "off-the-tops" (releasing related expenses), $15 million in interest expense, and reportedly around $90 million for talent participation." A total of $135 million in additional costs. With CW being a similarly-budgeted film with a lot of talent behind it, those costs should be very similar on Civil War. With WW having about 60% of BVS's budget I'll assume it was around 60% of those costs as well or ~$81 million (talent participation and guild fees shouldn't be too high, the only one who's not a literally who is Pine).

CW: 117 - 135 = -$18m
WW: 117 - 81 = $36m

Now add home video and TV revenues. According to Forbes, home entertainment sales for BVS were $240 million and global TV revenues were $125 million. AOU had $310 million in home entertainment and $160 million in TV revenue. WW made very close to BVS's overall gross, had better reviews, and actually made slightly more in places where home video sales are actually relevant (read: not China) so it should make similar in those areas. We'll also make the very, very generous assumption that Civil War will have similar performance in these areas to AOU, a film that made $300 million more at the box office.

WW: $36m + $240m + $125m = $401 million net profit.
CW: -$18m + $310m + $160m = $452 million net profit.

Again, CW probably made a lot less than AOU; if we apply the same percentages (AOU's home video sales were 22% of box office)... then home video sales would only be 22% of $1.153b, or $253 million. Now subtract the $57 million difference (we'll be nice and assume it'll still have the same TV revenue) and we get a final result of:

WW: $401 million
CW: $395 million

Damn. I genuinely wasn't expecting that when I started crunching numbers.

>>94789537
>>94790167
autism

>>94787106

When will Superman prove he deserves his spot?

>>94790183
no its arithmetic.

>>94790233
whose gonna take it from him?
J'onn?

>>94790247
>trying to figure out hollywood accouting when not even accountants know what they do and just come up with bullshit

that's not arithmetic

>>94789841
Thor and Cap and Hulk were only mildly successful.

Everyone already knows who Flash and Superman and Batman are. JL is going to be the advertisement for those movies, not the other way around.

Most of the people who went to see Avengers didn't see Thor and Cap, they were there for Iron Man.

>>94790333
yeah, people tend to forget that superman and batman are far more popular characters than pretty much everyone in the MCU except maybe spidey. Hordes of third world kids watched BTAS and Justice League, and they are now older and suddenly have a lot of spending power.

>>94789143
>for

Also
>LANGLOIS Funeral captcha

>>94789721
>Tickets cost more now a days due to I-Max, 3D, etc and people willing choosing a 'better' experience
>Movie still made more than Wonder Shit
>This means more people saw the Spider-Man movie than saw wonder woman
>Spider-Man was a cultural phenomenon when released, Wonder Woman is at best going to be remembered as an ok movie
Kek

>>94790685
Not only Spider-man, but also Batman 1989

It's amazing how smart DC people are. While Marvel was shitting out the same Iron Man rehashes three times a year, DC was laying the ground for an unsinkable ship. Kids grow up with DC cartoons (TTG, that princesses thing, DCAU), playing DC games (Arkham saga, Injustice) and some of them reading the wildly superior DC comics (Rebirth and their classic titles). Now even pieces of shit like Suicide Squad and those CW shows outperform equivalent Marvel products because the kids have been exposed to DC all their lives. And now a Wonder Woman solo movie is crushing a Spider-Man + Iron Man movie.

File: servalel.png (448KB, 846x900px) Image search: [Google]

448KB, 846x900px

>DCEU abortion single handedly salvaged by one overrated movie
>literally only became a success because GRRL POWAH and shit

You also realize DCucks had their first success because of the same gender pandering they belittle Marvel for practicing.

They are actual genuine hypocrites who praise a woman winning because she's a woman

>>94790910
>i-its an abortion
>every move is profitable and average grosses are practically the same as marvel movies.
>DCEU does a female superhero extremely well.

File: 1491965446197.png (111KB, 1037x586px) Image search: [Google]

111KB, 1037x586px

>>94790910
>first success

>>94791072
>average grosses are practically the same as marvel movies.
Higher actually. Suicide Squad wasn't released in China so DC should be ahead on worldwide average, you can see it in the domestic one. But hey, next movie will totes flop, /co/ told me this time they are done for!

>>94790233
When WB remembers he needs to be charismatic rather than just pitiful

File: 597.jpg (88KB, 480x260px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 480x260px

>>94791076
>CW
>Studio Net profit
>$194

>SS
>Studio Net profit
>$158

>>94791306
>doesn't read the next line.

File: 1503248473150.webm (3MB, 960x400px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 960x400px

>>94787687
>I thought the movie was fine after GotG2 being shit__

For all the talk about how BTFO I am I'm happy Wonder Woman is doing well. She's been around for like 80 years; she deserves this win after all that time. And maybe this will finally convince WB that people want superhero movies where the superheroes aren't angsting all over the place and that you can do something other than Batman and have it be successful. Maybe now we can finally get away from the Snyderverse,

>>94791356
>doesn't read his own fucking data

>>94791362
>movie is determined by it's CGI
someone post the floating spooderman.

File: 04457.png (616KB, 1160x629px) Image search: [Google]

616KB, 1160x629px

>>94791362
He's right you know

>>94791421
>i-i-i-i-i-it doesn't count
KEK

>>94791415
>movie that is released in one of the biggest markets in the world ends up making marginally more profit that a movie that wasn't.
>its revenue/cost ratio is lower.

>>94791306
They spent much more to get that much though. Suicide Squad had a better return on investment without China, that's the highlighted part and the only relevant one.

File: monkey.png (763KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

763KB, 1280x720px

>>94791443
>Rotten Tomatoes

>>94791464
>marginally more profit
>a full 200 mill more
>marginal
And it would have still beaten it without China
>>94791478
>CW
>Studio Net profit
>$194

>SS
>Studio Net profit
>$158

This kills the DCkek

>>94791496
>RT only counts while discussing BvS and MoS.

>>94791362
Yeah baby groot and that pacman shit was much worse. Sorry

>>94791518
>studio net profit is 158.45 to 193.20
>its is a worse ratio
wew lad.

File: 1499742820149.png (475KB, 538x519px) Image search: [Google]

475KB, 538x519px

>>94791443
You know what the best part of all this was? It outed DCfags as being nothing but hypocrites for dying by RT word considering a year ago they were saying that they didn't matter and made a petition for them to stop being so mean now with them changing their tone with WW they've systematically admitted that BvS and SS were shit.

>>94791573
>acktually we have the moral high ground

>>94791527
So you admit that they were bad movies? Okay
>>94791554
>net profit
>net profit
>profit
wew

>>94791518
>it's better to spend 100 bucks to get 12 dollars (12% ROI) on profit than spending 50 bucks to get 10 dollars (20% ROI) because 12 is more than 10!
Anon I...

>>94791599
And I just love how you're not denying it. Will you have that same tone when Justice League scores lower?

>>94791600
>movie costs significantly more to make
>net profit is barely a fraction of that because the chinese market sucks all the money.
>has a lower profit cost ratio.

File: 1495826472701.gif (2MB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x281px

>>94791607
>CW
>Studio Net profit
>$194

>SS
>Studio Net profit
>$158

>>94791573
No, we don't give a fuck about RT. Seeing MCU friends looking for excuses and saying that critics don't matter is the best part of all this. I still like BvS and MoS more than WW

File: 1498875008191.webm (1MB, 1280x524px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x524px

>>94791536
>>94791421

File: 1491905330189.gif (2MB, 245x190px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 245x190px

>>94791648
>CW return on investment
>1.31

>SS return on investment (no China)
>1.34

>>94791668
>W-w-w-w-w-w-we don't give a shit about RT
>W-w-w-w-we're just posting it ironically to make Marvel d-d-d-d-d-d-rones mad!
This is just sad

File: People_are_being_mean_by_making_mashups_of_sad_Ben_Affleck_s_reaction_to_Batman_v_Superman_reviews.jpg (16KB, 620x374px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 620x374px

>>94791643
>>94791703
>CW
>Studio Net profit
>$194

>SS
>Studio Net profit
>$158

>>94790725

And Donner Superman. Adjust that for inflation and it made over 500mil domestic and it made more overseas

File: wamp-wamp-wamp-o.gif (772KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

772KB, 320x240px

>>94787106
>Spider-Man Homecoming final gross when it comes out in China is projected to be as high as $850 million

>WW is looking to project worse than BvS in Japan with a final gross of 823 million

>>94791362

>Keeps posting that one scene from the part of the movie most agree was weak

Now show the CGI where the Avengers fight Ultron. It's been 2 years and it's already unwatchable

File: 1502732827589.png (568KB, 1820x1400px) Image search: [Google]

568KB, 1820x1400px

>>94791733
>that stutterposting
Sad indeed

>>94791626
sure, I don't mind the score. I wanted to see the JL ever since the animated series aired.

>>94791839

>Spider-Man is only going to marginally beat out Wonder Woman

That's shit

>>94791855
>make up

I'm glad WW is kicking ass. It proves DC properties themselves weren't the problem; giving them to asshole writers and edgelord directors was.
If WW had failed that would be fine to because it would've convinced WB to pull the plug all the sooner.
So it's a win-win so long as you're not a kinofag that has to backtrack and make excuses now.

>>94791839
>Spider-Man v Iron Man Dawn of Flops is likely to gross less worldwide than a Wondy solo flick despite costing more and having a record breaking marketing budget
>it's already confirmed it's going to make less in the US
Now I'm sad

>>94791889
You do realize that WW has beaten the majority of the Spider Man movies now right?

>>94791919
I was just happy to see themiscyra.
where did they shoot those scenes?

File: faggot.gif (3MB, 375x250px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 375x250px

>>94791940
>is likely to gross less worldwide than a Wondy solo flick
>doing better in every market than WW other than the US because they're not filled with numale feminists

>>94791917

>16 films
>Not a single award

The MCU is the face of mediocrity. DC is all under 1 studio so technically they have 4 since Superman won one as well

>>94792013
>make-up

>>94791998

Spider-Man had no competition internationally.

>>94792044

4 Oscars anon, 4. Marvel can't even win meme awards.

>>94792055
>no competition
>Despicable Me 2
>Pirates 5
>Fate of the Furious
>Bayformers 5

>>94792078
4 Oscars and 4 Razzies well...8 if you count Catwoman

>>94792097
Yeah, Wonder Woman had to go against all that and Baywatch, Mummy and Pirates on top. It still made 400M without Japan, almost as impressive as her domestic reign of terror

>>94792097
we aren't talking about wonderwoman.
>>94792127
>razzies
>anyone can pay to enter your movie into the list.

>>94792154
>Baywatch, Mummy
Films that underperformed?

>>94792154
>Wonder Woman had to go against all that and Baywatch, Mummy and Pirates on top. It still made 400M without Japan,
And it made less than nearly all of them because none of the countries have a feminist agenda to push

When will she fight the giant egg with the racist chinese face?

>>94792205
>it's a feminist agenda
SEETHING

>>94792159
>anyone can pay to enter your movie into the list.
Just like the Oscars! Of course paying to get on the list isn't the same as being nominated

>>94792180
They still put up a fight overseas. Pirates did as well despite bombing in the relevant markets

>>94792205
>feminist agenda to push
Ghostbusters flopped kid, you can stop embarrassing yourself now

>>94791940
>Spider-Man v Iron Man Dawn of Flops
So I take it you didn't see the movie, then?

>>94792232
>>94792227
>B-b-b-b-b-but Ghostbusters

I guess people are still using this defense

File: 1503242316483.png (98KB, 291x246px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 291x246px

>>94787632
I'm sure his mother can share.

That's very good! If only it worked out for Green Lantern too.

If they make another Wonder Woman movie, I hope they make Circe and/or Cheetah her next villains.

Politics aside, this is a good development for DC.

>>94791855
I don't get it, why would a DC fan want to post that? If that's your metric, then DC films are only marginally better than MCU, but significantly worse than Avatar.

>>94792232
>>94792227
>Women-only seeings

>>94792261
>ghostbusters aggressively markets itself as a feminist movie
>falls flat
>WW markets itself as a wonder woman movie.
>fucks everyone up the ass.

>>94792261
Since destroys the "it only did well becuz it was feminist" cop out excuse, better get used to it

File: Ms Marvel 1.png (599KB, 900x675px) Image search: [Google]

599KB, 900x675px

>>94787650
>nobody cares about Carol anyways
>just look at the comic sales. nobody really expected Captain Marvel to compete with Wonder Woman

>>94792303
>destroys
You keep believing in that

>>94790310
It's simple arithmetic when corporate politics and cherry picking arent involved

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-20 at 5.41.02 PM.png (247KB, 1040x602px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 1040x602px

>>94791855
I'm sure Marvel is really bummed about that Oscar.

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-20 at 5.42.16 PM.png (120KB, 727x438px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 727x438px

>>94791855
>>94792334
Disney tears part 2 - how will they ever cope edition

>>94792303
>>94792302
Yeah because it has nothing to do with people not giving a shit about the Ghostbuster's brand for nearly 30 years or anything

>>94792302
Exactly. Wonder Woman focused on being a comic movie first and foremost.

Speaking for myself, I have no problems with female protagonists.

Ghostbusters sucked not because it had women, but that it was a shoddy reboot attempt with a blatant activist message.

They should have had the movie take place in the same continuity the original with Janine Melnitz starting up a new Ghostbusters with some lady friends of hers IMO. That would have been a lot more fun and less political.

>>94787650
Probably a similar level as DC fans when BvS failed to even break a billion dollars.

>>94792367
If it was done right, it could have been great. Sadly it was handled poorly so we got a shitty movie.

>>94789537
>>94790167
The math is solid, but there are so many assumptions made that it's pointless.

File: 14909418246833.png (112KB, 1284x286px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 1284x286px

>>94792302
Stop trying to reason with these guys

>>94792334
>>94792334
>>94792361
>>94792361
>Brings movies that have nothing ot do with Marvel Comics or films based on them.

>>94792440
heh, the meltdown on /tv/ was magical.

>>94792391
>implying WW didn't have a girl power message

File: 1470267198859.jpg (41KB, 540x293px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 540x293px

>>94792410
Good times. Some hearty keks and OCs were had that night. Just wasn't the same when they actually got their act together

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYKeQczkFfM

>>94792446
>literally doesn't know how to read
The first image shows that the MCU is the #1 grossing franchise of all time, with a per film average above DC's

The second shows that the top 14 grossing films of all time have 4 MCU films on the list, but no DC films at all.

>>94792466
>girl power message
>Wonder woman's naive idea about the world falls apart and it takes someone she loves to sacrifice himself so that she can fulfill her destiny.

>>94792482
Jesus christ that's good ... got any more?

File: 14909418247249.png (319KB, 1868x604px) Image search: [Google]

319KB, 1868x604px

>>94792460
Pure kino indeed, but I think I still prefer the oscar night debacle, nothing in this company war autismfest comes close to that

>>94792527
But anon, there was a woman in it. And it acknowledged that gender inequality exists in a bit that lasted like, a minute at most. And also there was a woman in it, therefore, SJW propaganda.

I'm sure you can see the obvious connection.

>>94792570
keep them coming.

>>94792570
SS oscar win thread is peak /co/

>>94792594
honestly the only moment that happened was when the middle eastern guy told wonder woman that he wanted to be an actor but he was too brown and thus became a conman. That was a nice moment because they were both fighting their own battles during the great war.

>>94792570
>>94792615
Only thing that would've been better is the meltdown reverse if Strange had won its oscar 20 minutes later too

>>94792615
what happened there?

>>94792650
Mostly DC fans sperging out that it justified SS as a movie, as if a makeup oscar legitimizes a shitty film. But also plenty of MCU butthurt.

>>94790834
Marvel was playing 2d chess, while Dc was playing 5D chess

File: 14909418249932.png (100KB, 966x289px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 966x289px

>>94792608
>>94792615
I don't have them all, remember to screencap for JL. Who knows what MCUdrone treasures got lost in these "WW is going to flop" threads

File: 1432359895396.jpg (346KB, 540x891px) Image search: [Google]

346KB, 540x891px

>be Wondy fan
>just happy Diana's theatrical debut was a success, and SYNERGY is showing signs of editorial finally giving the IP some damn respect for once
Company wars are fucking stupid, and y'all need to knock that shit off.

>>94792261
awesome how you "feminist fault" faggots never refuted this argument

>>94791703
>thinking ROI matters more than dollars

1.31 and 1.34 are extremely close profit margins. If it's me, I'd much rather have the one that got me an extra $30million.

>>94792305
>he doesn't know about the power of a Marvel logo
Anon, Doctor fucking Strange made almost $700million. Ant-man broke $500m. Spider-man overcame the ASM branding. GotG are literal a-listers now.

Captain Marvel is coming out on the heels of Infinity War, right before Avengers 4. It's gonna be huge.

>>94792745
>SYNERGY is showing signs of editorial finally giving the IP some damn respect for once
>respect
>putting Robinson on the book for an arc about her brother

File: 1500163111897.png (37KB, 201x186px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 201x186px

>>94791573
>It outed DCfags as being nothing but hypocrites

Same thing happened with Marvelfags who say its overrated and claim it only got good reviews because of SJWs, while praising Homecoming.

>>94793024
Doctor Strange had Sherlock Holmes playing Iron Man fighting Hannibal in the world of Inception and 500M for a superhero movie is nothing to write home about. GotG is a true hit though

>>94793057
Eh, Robinson usually does good work, so if anyone can salvage that shit idea into something even vaguely passable, maybe he can. And hey, at the very least, the Wonder Rogues with definitely be getting some actual use, and that's always a good thing.

But yeah, people need to stop trying to make Gargareans a thing in Wonder Woman. It has never worked out, and it never will.

>>94787106
it's out? huh. why don't I.. feel like watching it?

>>94793192
>this much justification
Cumberbatch was in Star Trek 2 too, yet it made less money than Dr Strange.

Hannibal is not the draw you think he is.

$500m is still good money for a literally who. Everyone above Strange on the list is either:
-one of the big trinity from DC or Marvel
-Spider-man
-Deadpool
-X-Men
-Guardians

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/genres/chart/?id=superhero.htm

Deadpool and Guardians are the only surprises above Strange.

Don't let the trend of billion dollar hits make you think that all cape movies get free money.

>>94787106
>Outgrossed fucking Batman v Superman by 74 million domestically
Holy shit. Imagine how much BvS could've made if it was an actual good movie. Yet WB still gave fucking JL to that hack Snyder.

>>94791855
>LotR
>17
How can comiccuckolds even compete?

>>94793482
It might has well have been called "Guaranteed Billion: The Movie," but they still managed to fuck it up.

Even Deadpool made more domestically.

File: laffingEru.jpg (3KB, 124x78px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 124x78px

>>94793502
they can't

I wonder how far this movie can still go, at this rate it will earn more 3 million domestically at the very least plus Japan.

I would guess 820 million

>>94793624
I'm interested to see how it does in Japan, considering that promotional artbook. Like, does Japan have a thing for Diana I don't know about?

>>94793707
No they don't it was only used for promotion (Suicide Squad also go something similar and it only grossed 15 million there) Capeshit doesn't do great there.

>>94792205

Transformers would have flopped massively if it wasn't for China. It collapsed in every other market. Why do they like it do much?

>>94794536
It didn't even do well in China or by the standards for the franchise it didn't reach the same numbers as the 4th one

>>94792367

Yeah you can't revamp old beloved franchises and make money. Jurassic world was a massive flop after all

>>94794635
>Yeah you can't revamp old beloved franchises and make money
Yeah look at Baywatch

>>94794635
Please...for every Jurassic World there's a CHiPS, Baywatch, Pete's Dragon

>>94794708

Pete's Dragon was gr8 though.

>>94793502

They can't. Lotr did a lot of spectacular things and earned their Oscars. Comic films are a bunch of stupid crap. I can't wait for Thanos to quip and fart for cheap laughs

>>94794708

But it can be done well. Saying it failed because people don't care about Ghostbusters isn't just wrong, its retarded

Can wonder woman domestic box office surpass Iron Man 3 and Civil war? That would be impressive.

>>94795103

Possibly could get to CW but I think its to far. It got closer than it had any right to though