Thread replies: 3
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
Okay so obviously I understand that Bojack Horseman and Rick and Morty are different shows with a different premise. But it just seems like theirs only so far you can take a show about a nihilistic/irredeemable asshole that thrives off of blueballing the audience with a lack of resolution or development.
Like it was somewhat refreshing having a show that was willing to deny an audience the satisfaction of resolution, leaving conflicts unresolved mirrors real life more accurately than having a problem>conflict>resolution scenario every episode/season. Bojack literally bases it's premise off of this.
It just seems like its, done? If that makes any sense. I don't know what the motivation is, like I get it Bojack is never going to be a good person, Rick is never going to live a normal life. But its like they've written characters into a corner.
Can these shows ever "conclude" while keeping their characters in tact? Or are we just supposed to ride the ride forever?
>>
>>94785491
>Can these shows ever "conclude" while keeping their characters in tact?
Yes, by having them die.
>>
>>94785580
They already teased that in Bojack, I think they'll go the way of trying for a legit ending, thus compromising the premise.Seeing as how this season is going to revolve around Bojack's kid I think he'll to tied up with that to off himself.He's going to try again eventually though, they could also have him die on accident like Sarah Lynn which would be okay I guess.
Rick will kill himself on a cliffhanger but since death is essentially meaningless in Rick and Morty they'll fall back on that to have him come back in a different season.
Thread posts: 3
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1