Does it count as an animated movie?
I mean, its got to be at least 90% animated right?
Yes, but it wasn't very good. The visual spectacle was a nice distraction in 2009 when everything was going to shit, but the story and characters were tepid at best.
More importantly, it feels like fuckin' every movie with a budget over $50M is 90% animated these days. What happened to miniatures? What happened to matte videography?
>>94754539
>You will live to see the day a 100% cgi film is made and people unironically treat it like a live action film, for filling the prophecy where animation is no longer for kids in the american market.
Seriously, if that happens, would /co/ have to allow threads about these things?
>>94754539
The CGI is too good for it to count as /co/.
>>94754841
I think we'll be finding out when they do the quote-unquote live-action Lion King
>>94754857
But the writing is bad enough for it to count as /co/
>>94754841
>for filling
>>94754539
The autism in the fan base is quite strong even to this day.
>>94755678
There is a fanbase?
>>94754579
>What happened to matte videography?
Doesn't make movies that make over a billion box office. The contrarian in me wants the hate the movie but it was successful for a reason
>>94755678
What fanbase?
>>94754579
>>94755759
I'd like to think that there will come a day when people will start appreciating practical effects again, even if its only because it would seem so novel by that point.
>>94755678
Thursnay
>>94755743
>>94755760
Yes. It's small but it's out there, relatively scattered. And by god it's filled with some of the worst brainlets of all time. Honestly at least tumblr fandoms have an almost braincell but these people are like if normies with no taste or understanding of what constitutes deep collectively got together.
>>94754874
"Unobtanium! A-ha!"