What's your favorite Simpsons couch gag?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mw9s9nkuE30

File: 147076362983.jpg (57KB, 604x610px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 604x610px

>>94716367
>GOD'S NOT REAL BART WUBBA LUBBA D'OH D'OH

>>94716367
I hope they come back and do another couch gag with pickle Rick and lots of bible burnings.

File: 1410654059600[1].jpg (244KB, 610x475px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 610x475px

>>94716367
>M-M-ORTY *BRUUPP* YOU K-KILLED THE *BRUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUP* THE SIMPSONS

>>94716806
It was legitimately the funniest moment of the Simpson in fucking years. Maybe you gonna say it's a low bar to clear, but you cannot deny this.

>>94716917
lmao simpsons shills saying the early seasons are better, even though it's exactly the same shit. it's great seeing people become schizophrenic about this show. the simpsons was always shit

>>94716944
>mom look I'm trolling 4chan again

>>94716367
That 80s Miami Vice style Lazy Rider one.
I would legit just watch it if it were a show, kinda similar to Aqua Unit Patrol Squad One.

File: The_Decline_of_The_Simpsons.jpg (112KB, 943x539px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 943x539px

>>94716944
The early seasons being better is a well documented fact.

>Hey, Morty, could you hand me that *BURP* sneed on my workbench.
>R-Rick, there is no sn-sneed o-
>That's right, Morty! There is no Sneed! Fuck you and my family. WUBALUBADUBDUB! SHIT ON THE FLOOR! I'M ALWAYS RIGHT!
>*BURP* Hey Morty did you go to the *BURP* store like I asked?
>Y-yeah Rick I s-sure did our fans were t-there with me
>Oh Morty *BURP* good 4th wall hey *BURP* did you *BURP* get *BURP* everything *BURP* on *BURP* the *BURP* list *BU
>W-well I tr-tr-tried Rick except the l-last thing on the list
>'Sneed' is last on the list right *BURP* Morty?
>Y-yeah Rick I couldn't find sn-sneed--
>Exactly Morty! No one can find Sneed because he isn't real! SHIT DICK POOPY POOP WUB DUB
>FUCK SNEED, SUCK CHUCK, I'M SMART, WUBBALUBADUBDUB GET SCHIFTWY SHIT ON THE FLOOR YEAH! NIHILISM! *tips red cap*
>hey morty burp come here
>o-okay rick
>look up on that feed & seed store you see burp that right there look at that
>w-what rick
>that sneed on the sign
>b-but rick there isn't a sneed o-
>YOU'RE RIGHT MORTY THERE ISN'T A SNEED
>SCHWIFTY DIARRHEA KILL ME NIHILISM

>>94716453
John K further proving that he shouldn't touch animation ever again

>>94717217
>reddit starts liking it
It's totes bad now, guys

>>94717217
Needs to include November 7, 1999 as the day The Simpsons changed forever.

>>94717282
Of all the dumb "Reddit Boogeyman" posts on here, this might just be the dumbest.

>>94716367
Did you have to use that one? Now this is just a Rick and Morty jerkoff thread instead of a favorite couch gag thread.

>>94716367
The Don Hertzfeldt one.

File: 1490983845708.png (587KB, 930x941px) Image search: [Google]

587KB, 930x941px

>>94717325
The Tomacco episode...?

File: couch gag.gif (886KB, 325x244px) Image search: [Google]

886KB, 325x244px

I always found this one funny, because of their faces, and the fact that they aren't even trying to sit on the couch.

File: EhuKB3j.gif (990KB, 400x225px) Image search: [Google]

990KB, 400x225px

>/v/ and /pol/ won the war

Welp time to pack up and become a goon

We had a good run

File: 1502251507178.jpg (12KB, 272x285px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 272x285px

>>94716453
I never knew you could "over animate" something until this.

>>94719021
>over animate
keep your retard meme on /a/

>>94719021
Nothing wrong with "over animation", there's so many other things that he's doing wrong that the fluidity is the least of his problems.

File: 1503002125951.gif (4MB, 300x225px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 300x225px

This one was good.

File: 615768907648.png (707KB, 836x897px) Image search: [Google]

707KB, 836x897px

>>94719379
Fucking got me.

>>94716367
Chuck's Suck and Fuck
Formerly Sneed's.

>>94719379
See, the joke lies within the rhyming of the store's name. Sneed, Feed, and Seed rhyme with each other as they each end in -eed. Taking that away, you are left with Sn, F, and S. The Sn is irrelevant in this point, but the F and S are important factors in this joke. The bottom line "Formerly Chuck's" provokes one to replace Sneed's name in the title, initially producing the name "Chuck's Feed & Seed. However, as the sign had previously conditioned us to rhyme all the words, the mind does not perceive this as the proper name. The mind then subconsciously isolates the F and S and looks to Chuck's name. Ch is thrown out as it has no rhyming value, and the true relevant phonetic begins with -uck. Therefore, applying the suffix to Ch, F, and S, we arrive at the title "Chuck's Fuck & Suck." The end result is a hilariously inappropriate name, one that would never fly on a public store. The reason this is not a true name is both due to an In-Universe reason and a much more abstract reason. Along with being morally offensive, this whole arrangement of words is a cleverly-devised sight gag, meant for someone to glance at it for the fleeting amount of time it has onscreen and ponder about it. "Sneed's Feed & Seed, Formerly Chuck's." They may first wonder who this Chuck fellow is before connecting his name in place of Sneed, and it is then the subconscious rhyming kicks in. The person thinks for a second, laughs, and says something along the lines of "That's hilarious. I can't believe they got away with that."
Of course, the joke is now ruined thanks to lolsofunny people spamming it to high heaven always asking, "What did they mean by this?" or "ITT: Joke's you don't get" or just randomly shouting Sneed and Chuck's names in random Simpsons threads, ruining or derailing any semblance of a discussion they had. Yes, we all know what the joke is. No, we don't need this to be a micromeme of the next few months. You're killing threads with it, so you can stop anytime now.

>>94720437
See, the joke lies within the rhyming of the store's name. Sneed, Feed, and Seed rhyme with each other as they each end in -eed. Taking that away, you are left with Sn, F, and S. The Sn is irrelevant in this point, but the F and S are important factors in this joke. The bottom line "Formerly Chuck's" provokes one to replace Sneed's name in the title, initially producing the name "Chuck's Feed & Seed. However, as the sign had previously conditioned us to rhyme all the words, the mind does not perceive this as the proper name. The mind then subconsciously isolates the F and S and looks to Chuck's name. Ch is thrown out as it has no rhyming value, and the true relevant phonetic begins with -uck. Therefore, applying the suffix to Ch, F, and S, we arrive at the title "Chuck's Fuck & Suck." The end result is a hilariously inappropriate name, one that would never fly on a public store. The reason this is not a true name is both due to an In-Universe reason and a much more abstract reason. Along with being morally offensive, this whole arrangement of words is a cleverly-devised sight gag, meant for someone to glance at it for the fleeting amount of time it has onscreen and ponder about it. "Sneed's Feed & Seed, Formerly Chuck's." They may first wonder who this Chuck fellow is before connecting his name in place of Sneed, and it is then the subconscious rhyming kicks in. The person thinks for a second, laughs, and says something along the lines of "That's hilarious. I can't believe they got away with that."
Of course, the joke is now ruined thanks to lolsofunny people spamming it to high heaven always asking, "What did they mean by this?" or "ITT: Joke's you don't get" or just randomly shouting Sneed and Chuck's names in random Simpsons threads, ruining or derailing any semblance of a discussion they had. Yes, we all know what the joke is. No, we don't need this to be a micromeme of the next few months. You're killing threads with it, so you can stop anytime now

>>94720449
See, the joke lies within the rhyming of the store's name. Sneed, Feed, and Seed rhyme with each other as they each end in -eed. Taking that away, you are left with Sn, F, and S. The Sn is irrelevant in this point, but the F and S are important factors in this joke. The bottom line "Formerly Chuck's" provokes one to replace Sneed's name in the title, initially producing the name "Chuck's Feed & Seed. However, as the sign had previously conditioned us to rhyme all the words, the mind does not perceive this as the proper name. The mind then subconsciously isolates the F and S and looks to Chuck's name. Ch is thrown out as it has no rhyming value, and the true relevant phonetic begins with -uck. Therefore, applying the suffix to Ch, F, and S, we arrive at the title "Chuck's Fuck & Suck." The end result is a hilariously inappropriate name, one that would never fly on a public store. The reason this is not a true name is both due to an In-Universe reason and a much more abstract reason. Along with being morally offensive, this whole arrangement of words is a cleverly-devised sight gag, meant for someone to glance at it for the fleeting amount of time it has onscreen and ponder about it. "Sneed's Feed & Seed, Formerly Chuck's." They may first wonder who this Chuck fellow is before connecting his name in place of Sneed, and it is then the subconscious rhyming kicks in. The person thinks for a second, laughs, and says something along the lines of "That's hilarious. I can't believe they got away with that."
Of course, the joke is now ruined thanks to lolsofunny people spamming it to high heaven always asking, "What did they mean by this?" or "ITT: Joke's you don't get" or just randomly shouting Sneed and Chuck's names in random Simpsons threads, ruining or derailing any semblance of a discussion they had. Yes, we all know what the joke is. No, we don't need this to be a micromeme of the next few months. You're killing threads with it, so you can stop anytime now.

>>94721159
See, the joke lies within the rhyming of the store's name. Sneed, Feed, and Seed rhyme with each other as they each end in -eed. Taking that away, you are left with Sn, F, and S. The Sn is irrelevant in this point, but the F and S are important factors in this joke. The bottom line "Formerly Chuck's" provokes one to replace Sneed's name in the title, initially producing the name "Chuck's Feed & Seed. However, as the sign had previously conditioned us to rhyme all the words, the mind does not perceive this as the proper name. The mind then subconsciously isolates the F and S and looks to Chuck's name. Ch is thrown out as it has no rhyming value, and the true relevant phonetic begins with -uck. Therefore, applying the suffix to Ch, F, and S, we arrive at the title "Chuck's Fuck & Suck." The end result is a hilariously inappropriate name, one that would never fly on a public store. The reason this is not a true name is both due to an In-Universe reason and a much more abstract reason. Along with being morally offensive, this whole arrangement of words is a cleverly-devised sight gag, meant for someone to glance at it for the fleeting amount of time it has onscreen and ponder about it. "Sneed's Feed & Seed, Formerly Chuck's." They may first wonder who this Chuck fellow is before connecting his name in place of Sneed, and it is then the subconscious rhyming kicks in. The person thinks for a second, laughs, and says something along the lines of "That's hilarious. I can't believe they got away with that."
Of course, the joke is now ruined thanks to lolsofunny people spamming it to high heaven always asking, "What did they mean by this?" or "ITT: Joke's you don't get" or just randomly shouting Sneed and Chuck's names in random Simpsons threads, ruining or derailing any semblance of a discussion they had. Yes, we all know what the joke is. No, we don't need this to be a micromeme of the next few months. You're killing threads with it, so you can stop anytime now

>>94720437
>>94720449
>>94721159
This really is the Baneposting of /co/. It's ot its own pasta and everything.

>>94717492
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m78gYyTrG7Y

This one, yeah, it's pretty good.

File: 420.png (75KB, 983x1013px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 983x1013px

>>94716500
>WUBBA LUBBA D'OH D'OH

File: 1503008685341.jpg (14KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 480x360px

>>94721190
SOME CHUCKS ARE BORN
MAAAADE TO SUCK AND FUUUCK
UUUH IT'S CHUUUUUCK'S SHOOOOPPP YAAA

AND WHEN SNEED TAKES, OVER THEEEEE CONVIENCE STOOOREEE
TIME TO FEEEEED AND SEEEEEEEEEEED YEAAAAAAAAAA

IT AINT SNEED
IT AIN'T SNEEEED
FORMERLY CHUCKS SUCK N FUUUUCK

SOME CHUCKS ARE BORN
NEXT TO HOMERS FARM
LORD DON’T THEY SUCK YOU YAAAAAAAAA

BUT WHEN THE HOMER COOOMES THROUGH THE DOOR
LORD THE SHOP SELLS SEEDS N FEEEED

IT AINT SNEED
IT AIN'T SNEEED

>>94716367
>>94716453
>>94721303
Jesus, when did something as innocent and simple as the couch gag evolve into post modernist horror shows?

File: forced animation.webm (3MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 640x360px

>>94719065
>meme

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6i2l-LQ-dXI

>>94721545
This is hilarious and it makes sense if you pretend that she has Parkinsons.

>>94721545
All animated shows wish they could be this well animated all the time

>>94716367
The robot chicken one

>>94716367
If the Simpsons had the same lively animation from back then I don't think this Rick & Morty gag would had worked.

>>94721402
Well, the show is beyond repair now so may as well try new things and experiment with the corpse.

>>94717217
>Amy winehouse
Who?

>>94721303
I love the fact that it's poking fun at the Simpsons as a whole while still being absurdist and weird as all get-out.

I fucking love Don Hertzfeldt.

File: 1456463800222.png (17KB, 716x520px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 716x520px

>>94719379
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

They sit down and the Monty Python foot squishes them.

Simple and effective.

>>94722597
is that stephen merchant and if so why

>>94722120
>I'M PICKLE SNEEEED

>>94717492
This one

>>94722642
The Ricky Gervais show

>>94721546
I came here to post this one.

>>94722511
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUmZp8pR1uc

>>94717217
amusing that even wikipedia references that chart

File: pizzasea.gif (2MB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x300px

>Couch gags used to be used to pad out a few extra seconds of run time
>now they take up two or three minutes and are made by someone else

>>94722700
im aware but the original isnt from the show so why was it edited to stephen

>>94716367
Got a link to the OP gag?

>>94723261
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ecYoSvGO60