Illumination Studios

>>94705348
At least they're not Sony.

>>94705359
I agree.

>parent company now owns Dreamworks

I expect their movies to suddenly start looking a lot more sophisticated as they swipe all the expensive tech that studio's been developing for decades.

>want to hate Illumination but feel grateful they exist just to stave off further Disney monopolization

It's a dumb movie that was made to babysit kids while mom takes a nap or a shit or whatever. I don't see the problem.

>>94705487
We need better standards.

>>94705487
Kids movies are still an art form and animation should not be made to be like processed food.

>>94705603
>>94705611
Luckily, we already have decades of Sesame Street. Some kids are stupid, though, and for them this is acceptable.

>>94705623
We shouldn't dumb our kids down like this. My dad would've had me watching Akira Kurosawa instead of this shit as a kid.

>>94705656
We aren't dumbing down kids who are already stupid.

>>94705390

Possibly but for the most part Universal is leaving DreamWorks alone since they found out Illumination is run like shit.

>>94705656
>my dad's a weeaboo
My condolences.

>>94705673
Better a weeaboo than a retarded yuppie.

>>94705663
>>94705673
Down with the sheeple

>>94705669
Wait what ?

Sing was better than Zootopia but not as good as Trolls

>>94706020
Expertly crafted post.

>>94706020
I have no bait.jpg images, but I must respond.

File: IMG_5736.gif (514KB, 480x252px) Image search: [Google]

514KB, 480x252px

>>94706020
Please don't make these kinds of remarks

>>94706066
Or else?

>>94705669
sauce?

>>94705673
Weeaboos don't exist.

>>94706112
Then who's stealing my skub?

>>94706112
Have you gone to /a/ yet?

>>94706138
Yes and there are no weeaboos there either.

>>94705348

But, did it actually matter that they were animals?

>>94706159
Are you sure?

>>94706226
Yes.

>>94706219
Yes because it meant we didn't get hideous Illumination humans.

>>94706248
>Yes because it meant we didn't get hideous Illumination humans.

*Yes, because it meant we didn't get hideous Illumination humans.

File: applause.gif (823KB, 301x214px) Image search: [Google]

823KB, 301x214px

>>94706326

Did anybody else like the part where the theater floods? Shot looks so real, the lighting looks way better than many movies

>>94706086
I don't know, just stop!
>>94706219
They used the animal aspect quite a few times but low-key unlike zootopia screaming "LOOK THEY'RE FURRIES!"
>>94706644
That was delicious, same with the wet fur

Would this have been a better plot?

>>94705402
I would be happy if Disney controlled everything eventually

>>94708534
t. Walt

>>94708674
YOU CANNOT STOP ME

>>94706066
Not him but I actually liked Sing. I don't know why I did but I genuinely enjoyed it unlike Zootopia which I just sort of watched for something to do. Fuck watching Trolls though.

>>94705359
At least sony crapped out two decent movies while illumination arguably had only one. Don't try to derail this, bud.

>>94709012

Not that guy but I'm curious, is the decent movie Secret Life of Pets or Despicable Me 1?

>>94706020
>>94708985
Zootopia could have been great.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqlaPttudUc

Fuck Disney for chickening out.

File: Co's Bizarre Adventure-min-1.png (2MB, 1366x6000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1366x6000px

Today, I will remind them.

>>94705348

Pretty much everything Illumination has put out feels less like a feature film and more like a pilot movie for a television series.

>>94709976

It's hard to call it chickening out when people watching it actively hated the setting to the point that they wanted Nick and Judy to just leave the city to rot.

>>94710142

Hopps. not Judy.

They are cheap and lazy with just about everything, but they aren't Sony.