Well, which is better, Disney shorts or Looney Tunes?

>>94392953
Steven Universe

Disney. They were better animated, and more original.

A lot of looney tunes shorts were just brainless slapstick, and often enough the same slapstick repeated over and over.

>>94392993
>more original

Disney was definitely more anal about keeping the animation even and smooth, but they were NOT more original. All of Disney's characters lacked strong personalities (especially Mickey or any of their 'cute' one offs). That's why Looney Tunes was more popular during wartimes, they were alot more human than a 10 minute short about a naked baby kissing a flower that turns into a tree that starts dancing to violin music. Kitschy.

>>94392953
The current ones? Disney by a mile, it's not even a contest. Poor Bugs, I don't know what they're smoking over at WB.

Disney treats its properties better.
The latest Mickey Mouse cartoons are miles better then Wabbit, and Disney never tries to be hip with the kids like Warner Bros did with Space Jam and Loonatics and all that bullshit.

>>94393236
Actually I take that back, stuff like Goof Troop and Ducktales is sort of "hip with the kids" but I think it pulled it off better

But the classics I may prefer Looney Tunes if only because the density of jokes is greater. Mickey isn't a great leading man, but while I would prefer Bugs over Mickey, I might like Donald and Goofy over Daffy and... and... I don't even know who would be the third most popular Looney Tune. Porky Pig?

>>94392953
is this a troll question or something? i assume from your pic you mean the classic 20-40s shorts?

warner bros has 20+ well known characters that have all different personalities

disney has 5.

Looney Tunes is objectively the greatest animated series of all time.

Also OP, limit "Disney shorts" down to "Silly Symphonies." I'd say Fantasia and certain other Disney things are better than the majority of Looney Tunes, but if we're just talking about the theatrical shorts then Looney Tunes is GOAT.

File: Steve_Cortez.gif (2MB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 960x540px

I'm going to refrain from pushing the point that Loony Tunes isn't even good and instead focus on the fact Disney beats in every single area, taking the more recent shorts into account.

>>94393316
>Porky Pig?
Elmer. The three share skits.

>>94393546
Chernabog is a character.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEcjjW_Nq5w

Overall I think Looney Tunes is better. However, in modern times Disney is far better.

Disney had the better animators, Warner had the better cartoonists.

>>94392993
A lot of Disney shorts were straight retellings of public domain stories, hardly original.

>>94392953
According too
>The 50 Greatest Cartoons: As Selected by 1,000 Animation Professionals
>Warner Bros:18
>Disney:9
I'd agree with that.

>>94392953
Donald carried whole Disney shorts.
Looney tunes had several one hit wonders like Michigan frog.

>>94392953
Back then LT, now Disney

Warner Bros, no questions asked.
>>94393236
>>94393234
Wabbit is getting better with Daffy being crazy again and Porky being fat again.

The Rudish Mickeys however are a guilty pleasure of mine but are a embarrassment to real Disney stories, let alone Mouse Works/House of Mouse which still ass rapes it.

In short stick to the comics when it comes to Disney.
>>94393316
You're thinking of Quack Pack, DuckTales87 tried to produced a quality show.

The less said about Nu-DuckTales the better.
>>94393681
>>94393734
Debunked.

>>94396099
Again, Wabbit is getting better with Daffy being crazy again and Porky being fat again and the Rudish Mickeys however are a guilty pleasure of mine but are a embarrassment to real Disney stories, let alone Mouse Works/House of Mouse which still ass rapes it.

File: thats-not-how-this-works-gif-3.gif (2MB, 480x268px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x268px

>>94396113
>Debunked.

Golden age Loney toons > Golden age disney
Current disney >>> Current looney toons

>>94396135
>Wabbit is getting better with Daffy

Too bad it still sucks

>>94396113
>>94396135
>an embarrassment to real Disney stories, let alone Mouse Works/House of Mouse which still ass rapes it.

I dunno, I personally like a bit more the current Mickey shorts than MMW and HoM

>>94396625
You're not only delusional but also sick in the head, at least MMW and HoM were respectful to the original shorts & Walt's vision, Rudish Micky is every thing Walt hated about animated.

>>94396673

I still like the new shorts a bit more, whether Walt would like them or not is irrelevant, he's being dead for decades

There's literally nothing wrong with trying something new, especially if you make it good

>>94396743
Nothing you said is true.
You're delusional, seek help and get meds.

>>94392953
Disneyesque animation is all but unbearable for me to watch, so LT wins by default.

File: 1460406361992.png (4KB, 203x231px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 203x231px

>>94396759
>I still like the new shorts a bit more

I know for a fact this is true

File: YesAnd.png (33KB, 106x188px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 106x188px

>>94396673
>at least MMW and HoM were respectful to the original shorts & Walt's vision, Rudish Micky is every thing Walt hated about animated.
If the stuff can be fun and entertaining, then it really doesn't matter at all whether it is or isn't in agreement with Walt's vision. I don't even think that most people give a shit about that minor aspect.

Unless the people are someone who get needlessly obsessed over the 'originals' and can't move on. At which point it just gets sad that they'd limit themselves so much.

>>94396589
This. Pretty much entirely this.

>>94396777
No, it's not.
>>94396793
Yes, they do, it's why most people avoid Disney's TV unit.

File: 1458153806140.png (292KB, 800x718px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 800x718px

>>94396819
>Yes, they do, it's why most people avoid Disney's TV unit.
Well good for them. It still doesn't change the fact that in the long run, if something is entertaining, then it doesn't matter.

>>94396113
>Wabbit is getting better with Daffy being crazy again and Porky being fat again.

Just because they try to make the characters to how they used to be doesn't mean they're automaticaly as good as they used to

>>94396897
Better then forcing Donald to fly south for the winter when he was seen in winter landscapes multiple times in the original shorts.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEFTJVUEo7M

File: DONALD.png (2MB, 1364x768px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1364x768px

>>94396988
>implying

The Christmas special was fucking amazing

>>94396988
Here's the thing, Donald having to go south for the winter was actually entertaining

File: death_battle__30_daffy_duck_vs_donald_duck_by_augustohirakodias-d990s3n.jpg (337KB, 1000x562px) Image search: [Google]

337KB, 1000x562px

Better debate

Donald or Daffy?

File: donald smile.png (175KB, 515x430px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 515x430px

>>94397126
Donald

File: donna.jpg (68KB, 365x341px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 365x341px

>>94397126
Daffy may be crazy but he'll never be shell-shocked Donald Duck crazy.

>>94397126
Donald > Daffy
Bugs > Mickey

>>94397084
Thats not the point, the point was that there was no point to shove in a pointless point in this.

Donald was shown in a winter backdrop more then once and what they did was disgraceful the the source material, please do research before you end up shitting on Ollie Johnston's grave.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fIomAY6SYA

I mean for fuck sakes, Scrooge's first appearance was in Christmas on Bear Mountain, a winter based plot no less due to everything taking place in the northern hemisphere.

>>94397222
This is objectively true

even if I like Mickey more than Bugs

>>94397126
Definitely Donald
but I like Bugs more than Mickey

File: hey there.jpg (7KB, 344x240px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 344x240px

>>94397223
Why does it matter if it's funny and entertaining?

>>94397262
Things are better if research is done, otherwise things can go wrong.

>>94397284
Nothing went wrong tho, the Christmas special was bretty gud

>>94397300
Thats a moot point in the end.

File: 1457280376150.png (3KB, 493x402px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 493x402px

>>94397326
Then let's just agree to disagree I guess

You have your opinion, I have mine

>>94397339
In the end I find them a guilty pleasure.

>>94392953
right now disney

>>94392953
Disney shorts by a landslide.
In terms of animation, Looney Tunes animators are Disney inbetweener level at best.
No way they could compete with Disney's Nine Old Men.

>>94393708
So? He's a non-character, he doesn't even have a personality.

>>94396135
Wabbit is still a thing? I thought it was dead

Disney, the only character worth watching is Daffy in Looney Tunes.

>>94392953
Disney

they've always been better and always will be better