Should I read Wolfman's Titans or Claremont's X-MEN?

Yes.

Claremont, I could never get into anything Wolfman wrote. The George Perez art is a treat for sure though.

Also if you go down the X-Men route the early stuff is rough and classic Bronze Age wordy.

Lobdell's X-Men

read both, but read Claremont's X-Men first.

>>94388043
I prefer X-Men but that's just me

Claremont's X Men.

Wolfman/Perez NTT is pretty good tho, esp Perez's art.

>>94388043
Fun Claremont drinking game: take a shot whenever someone's "focused totality" is mentioned or someone randomly says a word in their native language.

If you live past five issues, you win.

The correct answer is Levitz/Giffen LoSH

PAD's Young Justice
Generation X
Gen13

Do both. They're both great team books.

If it HAS to be one, even though I've been on a huge Titans kick for the last.... three years or something, go with X-Men. It's more expansive with a bigger cast of characters and believe it or not Marvel had LESS annoying crossover shit than DC back then.

>>94388324
This completes the "youngsters with powers" trifecta.
I like Infinity, Inc. as well.