Female writers are not the problem
>>94348187
Yes they are
>>94348187
Female anything is the problem
>>94348187
1. stop assuming their gender reeeEEEEE
2. here are the problematic ones i noticed from a glance
>>94348187
I'm assuming at least one of these biddies is writing Shade, and at least a few more are also working on that book
so they're cool
>>94348187
If you wouldn't fuck at least 80% of these women you have a case of the gay
>>94348187
Obviously, as being a bad writer knows no gender.
>>94348254
>Female anything is the problem
>>94348187
Woah. So this is the power of feminism.
>>94348187
Perlmutter will be furious that they have been drinking milkshake.
>>94348334
Bendis, Waid, and Spencer prove that you can't beat men when it comes to shit writing.
>>94348187
*hisss* *slither* YESSS, THE EGG-LAYERSSS OF YOUR SSSPECIESSS ARE TO BLAME FOR ALL OF YOUR PROBLEMSSS. BE SSSURE TO BROADCASSST YOUR DISSSREGARD FOR THEM THROUGH ANY OF YOUR AVAILABLE PUBLIC MESSSAGING SSSYSSSTEMSSS AT ALL TIMESSS.
AND DON'T FORGET TO SSSPREAD THE IMAGE OF OUR... SSORRY, "YOUR" IDOL AND GOD, PEPE THE AMPHIBIOUISSS ONE, SSSO "YOUR" INFLUENCE MAY SSSPREAD ACROSSS YOUR PRECIOUSSS GLOBE!
>>94348187
I agree.
It's someone else.
>>94348187
Seriously? Did they actually throw away the resumes of people more professional than the staff in the OP pic just for being male?
The comicbook industry truly is dying.
>>94348524
go away nazi
>>94348187
>twitter thread
see you in hell
>>94348318
skullfuck counts? the only way to keep that whores quiet
>>94348549
>The comicbook industry truly is dying.
it's actually one of the few written mediums experiencing growth
>>94348551
>>94348187
That yellow shirt girl in the front kind of reminds me of Erin from The Office.(although I know it's not her)
>>94348187
What am I supposed to be getting angry about?
>>94348574
>>94348581
>>94348603
Why are they doing the straight edge arm cross? Are they appropriating my culture?
>>94348613
>>94348632
>>94348579
The fact that no one is holding a legit milkshake.
>>94348647
>>94348632
>>94348187
> that poor guy working the milkshake booth
>>94348682
>oh milkshake booth man we ran out of money please accept payment in the form of blowjobs
>>94348670
>>94348187
>woman gets a troll comment
>LITERAL WAR CRIME let's celebrate by buying corporate products
Americans
>>94348697
>posting a literal shill
>>94348655
But they're crossed at where the bracelets would be, blocking one of them and rendering it pointelss.
Ah, fuck it. I'm giving too much thought as to why these people at DC are fucking up a DC character's pose.
>>94348717
>>94348730
>>94348524
Accurate post.
You're right, Bendis is.
>>94348786
a feckless racist fantasizing about killing an imaginary boogeyman?
sounds about right
>>94348187
Female editors are the problem.
>>94348730
Gabby Rivera strikes me as the type of person who would have a legit panic attack if someone showed that picture to "her"
>>94348187
Female editors are the problem?
>>94348524
I would agree but most of the greats that made these stories awesome were Jews.
>>94348475
>Pepe is a Reptillian plot
That actually kinda makes sense
>>94348664
The fuck even is that retarded hashtag
>start reading a comic
>notice that writer is female
>drop it
>>94348664
That's what happens when you move your office from NYC to the cultural wasteland of California. There's no place to get decent food with in walking distance, you're stuck with Starbucks.
The sex of a writer shouldn't mean anything, but when they specifically insert their sex politics into the shit they write it probably gets very dumb very fast.
>>94349000
And they invariably do.
>>94348836
And she works for fucking Disney, a company so conservative it shits the 50s.
Gimme a fucking break. All these SJW are full of shit. Just try to write a decent book and spare me your fake outrage and ready-made beliefs. César Chávez had some balls. You're just a fat loser looking for validation.
>>94349222
>And she works for fucking Disney, a company so conservative it shits the 50s.
These two statements are mutually exclusive.
>>94349244
Go back to bed, junior.
>>94348187
You're right. It's female writers AND editors. And the numales that let them get away with it.
>>94349276
>defends a shit statement
>calls others names
>>94348475
NO! Reddit will NEVER fall for your tricks! We will support women no matter what. These poor WOMEN were HARASSED for drinking MILKSHAKES! And the worst part is that some people were asking for proof?? Hello! Remember the words of the great Anita Sarkeesian: "Listen and Believe." Have we already forgotten how oppressed women are? We have to let them do anything with absolutely no oversight because of all the suffering they've endured for thousands of years (and even to this day). Remember the pay gap? Yeah, I thought so. It makes one wonder how they can even afford milkshakes with such a meager, slave-like salary.
>>94349285
If you are not familiar with that particular idiom, look it up. Moron.
>>94348187
You are right there have been plenty of good female writers over the years.
But the current crop of fake geek girls at marvel can't do shit cos there fucking ideological retards
>>94349285
Here is an example that applies to you.
>>94349421
>Go back to bed, junior.
>>94348187
They're really milking this milkshake bullshit, aren't they?
Also, I don't recognize a single face, are these actual writers or editors?
>>94349474
Who knows? Some of them might not do anything at all and are just there for their socially and politically mandated sinecure.
>>94349474
They're assistant editors.
>>94348187
whats this arm cross thing?
is it the wonder woman thing or is it some new feminist thing?
>>94349474
>They're really milking this milkshake bullshit, aren't they?
It's the most manufactured outrage since the female Dr.Who bullcrap.
It should painfully, painfully obvious by now that companies just use internet outrage, real or otherwise, for free advertising.
Worked for Ghostbuster I guess.
Listen, if you think you can change decades old societal problems by buying stuff then you're an idiot.
>>94348447
You must be blind if you can't see the GIANT DC LOGO behind them
>>94349510
>is it the wonder woman thing or is it some new feminist thing?
Yes. It's also Illuminati psyop tactic. You see, the gesture resembles the letter X, the 24 letter of the alphabet. Adding the numbers gives you 6, which as we all know is a component of the number of the beast.
So yeah, they've all been tricked into worshiping satan while holding phallic imagery near their mouths. Good going girls, way to fight the power!
>>94348187
>>94348266
>all of those starbucks cups
>>94349474
Nobody fucking cares apart from the twitter crowd that doesn't even read comics. Half of these women probably hate every other woman they work with, but they'll come together for this fake virtue signaling crap.
>>94348187
Why are they crossing their arms in a Skull and Bones style?
Is it a reference to something?
>>94349658
The Nazis took all the other hand gestures.
>>94348549
what would make you assume this?
>>94349658
Wonder Woman maybe?
>>94349731
Ah yeah just noticed the big ass DC logo. Fair nuff.
>>94349794
It's like they don't want me to buy their comics. I mean, sure I can pirate them if they want me to. It's too bad since I was actually buying a few new ones. Oh well, not my problem.
I'd have to know the percentage for both them and marvel to be honest.
But I can't say this doesn't anger me. And I can't say it wouldn't be a regular thing in many offices these days. I just hope, as with healthcare, that as women begin to enter the field the wages stagnate even more or go down. They're terrible workers, even if they'll answer an email at 11PM.
>>94349871
maybe, just maybe, they dont give a fuck about you at all?
>>94350111
Maybe, just maybe, that's why comics are failing?
>>94350143
so the way to rescue the industry is to care about special little you?
you should let them know
Great thread.
>>94349871
DC knows they're dying they can't into movies or TV shows they get maybe one game every 3 years and even they know comics are dead so they just don't care anymore
>>94350111
>>94350248
not that anon but the implication here is that they give a fuck about women or people that demand representation.
they don't. and it's why it's they type of argument only a faggot would make. You get no social credit for posting such fallacy here. So why do it?
There's also the fact that Rebirth, by and large, very much was pandering to the type of sperg who was REEing about Marvel.
>>94350248
I did. By not buying their crap. See that's how it works.
>>94350270
You see, by acting exactly like the type of fans Marvel and DC are parodying, we act exactly like the type of fans DC and Marvel are parodying.
>>94348187
> OK, Marvel fucked up a few days ago and you'll do a photoshoot to prove we are a great family (ha ha ha)!
> Do we have to do it, it's kind of ridiculous and i have wor...
> Who told you, you have a choice, move your ass!
> ... Ok boss!
>>94350304
you wanna not buy the books because they suck? that IS how it works yes.
you wanna not buy the books because they took a photo and posted it on the internet? thats something else
>>94350334
>implying it's not a causal link
>>94350334
No, literally any reason a company gives you a reason is valid.
I may not drop the shit off my pull but that anon is completely right to do so if that's how he feels. It's not "something else" it's the free market. Just as this type of shit is supposed to get women to want to read comics, since it's inclusive, not because the stories are good. Would you refer to that as "something else"?
>>94350332
I don't think you realize, anon. If you write or draw and would like to do so professionally, avoid this topic on social media. This is a "smoke the spergs out" trend. Instablocks for anyone on "the other side of the issue".
Circle the fuckable ones. Couldn't find many.
>>94350334
So now he HAS to buy it to prove he doesn't hate women?
>>94350399
no dumbass
>>94350364
the photo does not change the quality of the books, if you liked them last month, you should be fine with them this month
>>94350429
>no dumbass
Then it's not something else. Get over yourself.
>>94350429
>company does something you don't like
>just keep buying to product or... something
Nah.
>>94348366
Why does this post seem so odd. Like it's not supposed to be here or some shit like that?
>>94348700
Explain?
>>94349719
Women are in a room together, that means a man was screwed somehow.
>>94348187
1/3 fat and ugly neets
>>94348524
But the Nazis were feminists.
>>94350429
quote for me where I said it changed the quality. Hint: I didn't. I specifically asked you why, since the quality is unaffected, they use pictures and narratives like "girls read comics too" in order to get them to read comics.
if they're good they'll read them. Shouldn't matter how many women or men are making them. That's your premise, at least.
So again, why is it okay to past this photo celebrating women in comics (with the full intention of selling more books, as with every PR move) and not okay to say "fuck that"?
Free market works all ways. Chick Fil A has the best fucking chicken in the country. A lot of faggots don't eat there because of them bankrolling anti-LBGT causes.
>>94350395
That's sexist and disgusting
>>94350506
>Free market works all ways. Chick Fil A has the best fucking chicken in the country. A lot of faggots don't eat there because of them bankrolling anti-LBGT causes.
This. Goes both ways.
>>94350506
why is it not ok to post it?
its a marketing move not aimed at you?
so what?
>>94350506
there is better chicken..........
>>94350395
yeah. just circle them and imagine that you can choose who you want to fuck
>>94350668
yeah, do this haha
Stop making this fucking thread already. It's a nothing controversy. It only matters because you bitch about it.
>>94350634
Yeah but places with better chicken don't hate fags like I do
>>94348187
True dat. Only bad writers are the problem.
>>94350634
>better chicken
oxymoron
>>94349871
You're gonna stop buying their physical comics cause they didn't have their logo up front?
>>94350608
Yeesh, you either don't read or realize you don't have a point to make here.
Where did I say it wasn't okay? Quote me. You attributed a point I didn't make to me before. And here you did it again.
If anything I'm saying it's all okay. They can post a picture which is telling women "see you can read comics, they are written by women too." And women, even if the quality was never discussed, are in the right to read it.
Men are just as in the right to say "too many women."
It can't be okay for women to say "No, comics are for guys because they're written by guys." if "No, those comics are for women because they're written by women" isn't also valid.
>>94349510
>women do literally anything
> "is this a feminism? should I be angry?"
>>94350634
>attempting to shift the conversation when the legs your argument was propped up on reveal themselves to be imaginary.
>>94350761
But they're not triggered, no way. And they totally understand women.
>>94350746
>why is it okay to past this photo celebrating women in comics (with the full intention of selling more books, as with every PR move) and not okay to say "fuck that"?
I took this to mean that you were saying fuck it based on the picture. I guess I was incorrect. sorry.
>>94350761
Why did you assume I implied feminist symbols?
I merely didn't get what the arms cross was a reference to.
>>94350814
I did say that.
They are absolutely entitled, as a consumer, to say "too many women" if women were entitled to say "too many men".
The narrative has been women don't read comics because only white men write them.
If it is "okay" to say "too many white men", as you seem to accept, then it is just as "okay" to say "too many women".
Somehow you seem to think the former is acceptable and the latter is not.
>>94348836
That image made me hate Jews, brown people and women just a bit more. Thanks.
>>94350849
I dont do either actually.
>>94350856
The Witch King of Angmar was defeated from stabbed in the leg by a hobbit and then a human lady.
>>94350893
>why is it not okay to post it
implies you think it is okay to post it, which we agree with.
this interaction:
>I took this to mean that you were saying fuck it based on the picture.
implies you don't think the men are entitled to say "fuck that."
>>94350815
>Why did you assume I implied feminist symbols?
> is it some new feminist thing?
can you not remember what you literally just posted?
Why is everyone acting like this is a photo from the Marvel office when you can see the DC logo in the background?
>>94350516
I know. How could he put a big blue circle around the ham beast?
>>94348187
SJWs are the problem. They need to die. I can't wait till Perlmutter has Sana Amanat executed for her crimes!
>>94348759
That's ops image tho
>>94350982
No one knows what logo is what
We don't pay attention to that part of the movie
>>94348549
Print is general is dying, newpapers, books, everything. But people won't stop reading and writing books just because physical copies aren't cost effective anymore. Comics will survive too, it's Diamond that will perish.
>>94348187
What do they write for?
I feel like asking this question is already a problem
>>94348836
We should share some "pride" with her.I mean we should throw bricks through her window
>>94351123
That's the joke. Most don't.
>>94348187
Blaming women doesnt explain bendis, slutt et al.
Blame shitty writing and shitty writers, and shitty editorial.
>>94349623
>Nobody cares
>Except for the people that care, which is Twitter
Twitter is a much bigger and influential community than 4chan.
Oh God is this going to be like that Ubisoft image from women's day? Where people post a picture of a group of women and pretend they make up the majority of a place that employs hundreds and hundreds?
>>94351008
>wanting someone to die for having a different opinion
i thought 4chan liked freedom of speech?
>>94350399
Welcome to America, where apparently you fight for minorities' rights by handing over all your money to big corporations.
And then liberals get triggered when someone calls them champagne socialists.
>>94348266
>here are the problematic ones i noticed from a glance
elaborate.
not all of us are Instagram stalkers.
>>94348187
>99% white
WHERE'S THE DIVERSITY?!
>>94351587
There's a pretty sizeable chunk of Asians and people who clearly aren't white
>>94351618
Have SJWs taught you nothing? Anyone who isn't black, and also some black people, are "white" when you want to make a point.
>>94348187
Be kind to women, they have a genetic disorder that made then unable to be men. That's a tough thing to deal with.
>>94351008
She's getting canned though right?
>>94351008
she's going to be marvel's next EIC, you know it's going to happen.
>>94348570
No it isn't.
Top kek, women are so insecure. All it takes is a couple of insults to make them go out of their way to have a reaction to it that lasts for days.
>>94352826
It is, look at the annual totals since 2011. At the moment, the biggest growth is in trades.
>>94352827
boys are so insecure. all it takes is a couple of females to make them go out of their way to have a reaction to it that lasts for days.
>>94352843
Trades dont save floppy stories in the cancellation range.
DC themselves admitted at San Diego that the industry is in danger.
>>94348187
It is in Marvel since are shit.
>>94348187
Shit writers are the problem
>>94353370
Because of Marlel. DC's doing fine, but they need their competition to keep up because they can't hold up the industry on their own.
>>94348836
>actively supports dissidents
>has job
Fucking hell I wish I could be as open
>>94348187
wow, there's a lot of Rightclops fans on DC
>>94350395
Good choices desu. You have some high standards but I can respect that.
>>94353489
I fucking wish. If that many writers liked cyclops we wouldn't be in the mess we're in. Even if they are all DC
>>94348187
Why the fuck don't these women join in and do the same pose?
>>94354431
Too good for the loser nerds.
That blonde on the right is a qt, so I can understand her reasoning.
>>94354431
Because they're boys.
>>94354431
Well the girl on the right clearly either has something on her sweater, or is very interested in the girl beneath her.
> What makes you think you'd be great for DC Comics?
> I don't read any of your comics but I can be summoned at an instant to take a photo along with other women so people don't call you sexist.
> fuck you're hired.
Feminism is a bioweapon designed to destroy Western civilization. The "Femin" Virus lays dormant until Environmental/Social Conditions cause it to activate/re-activate.
>>94354650
I snickered but it's not funny because it probably holds some truth.
>>94348187
betas trying to appeal females are the problem
>>94354722
Fucking white knights are the worst.
>This whole thread
t. This guy
This is actually kinda of a brilliant move by DC. I mean they HAVE to show some support for Marvel's fake controversy or else they would be crucified by the "media", but they decided to do it in a way that serves to make Marvel look pathetic. Compare that pic with Marvel's, instead of having Brevoort's creepy assistant editor all white young female staff, they show an actually diverse group of many more women working at the company in different positions.
Also they're using the opportunity for free WW publicity instead of holding milkshakes.
>>94348187
I do hope they got some discount for so many Milkshakes.
>>94355162
Literally the day of the rope fags.
MARVEL BTFO
GEE I HATE POL
BETTER HAVE TWENTY BILLION FUCKING THREADS ABOUT GENDER
THST SHOULD HELP
>>94355162
>he never studied the blade
>he never cultivated inner strength
Block chain is for fags though
Replace "That game" with cartoons and comics.
Heh
>>94350395
There's a few more than that, but yeah it's not many
>>94350395
>Circle the fuckable ones. Couldn't find many.
>>94355492
>>>94350395
>There's a few more than that, but yeah it's not many
>>94348279
they're all just DC staffers/editors. none of them are writers/artists
>>94355531
Found your new waifu
>>94350395
>this thread still exists
Comics. And. Cartoons.
>>94355638
Just sit back and enjoy the pandemonium
>>94355638
Comics and Cartoons have writers.
And the terrible ones have females writers!
>>94350429
Anon, you don't think the people posting ITT actually read comic books do you?
You should know better by now.
Don't feed the /pol/posters, hide and report /pol/ threads.
>>94355492
The hell is wrong with you guys; are you trying to ignore some of the hottest ones? Some of the others are fine alright looking girls as well.
Also, Jamie Lee Curtis off in the back hasn't aged well.
.
>>94355663
Is it really so much to ask for mods that actually do their fucking jobs
Remember when mods were aggressive and issued red bans? Pepperidge farm remembers.
>>94355719
I do and that would suck now. The staff are green as fuck and from other sites and communities. I'm very glad they're hands off otherwise this place would be even shittier. What /co/ actually needs is some self moderation but they consider anything restrictive like that to be /a/ elitism.
You make your bed. You sleep in it.
>>94355719
>I don't like thread
>The solution is to go into that thread and post about it
>>94355766
Yeah, MODS=FAGS has never even remotely been more true
Still, just red banning a few fags leaking out from /pol/ would send the right message and get the garbage-ass discussion in /co/ and /v/ back on a reasonable track
>>94348655
It'd make sense if they were able to actually block out shitty comments instead of reverting to a fetal position anytime they see something that flies close to negativity.
>>94355595
She probably sucks a mean dick so I'll take her.
>>94348187
I HATE IT when photographers make people sit on the floor.
>>94355799
/pol/ isn't even the whole problem. Yeah it's raiding right now but it's pretty ingrown here and on other boards. What makes /co/ unique is tumblr did the same shit years ago and has ingrown here as well.
The tumblr boogieman has re-surged, yes, but it was in use seven years ago for a reason.
I'm not saying all mods are fags but there has been a lot of reshuffle and shit over the last few years. There a logs around and history released. A lot of them are fucking awful and actively dislike some boards they focus on.
If you need evidence of a newfag mod look no further than /a/'s own nipple mod
If it's a choice between structured newfaggotry and a bit of a shit show with a chance of salvaging the board I know which one I'd pick.
>>94355719
>>94355799
It would actually be fun and interesting if there weren't several fucking threads at once. Warn the bastards that start a topic that's already on the front page and then start issuing bans.
>>94355766
Self-moderation won't happen because too many people here are from outside the community as well. I miss the damned board fun, even when it was rule violating, but we can't have that when you're being flooding by politics and several generals about just one fucking show.
>>94350395why does simply adding a few circles increase the filesize almost three times?
>>94351567
black, fat, and or short haired "rebel". i would also lump the ones with big glasses. also>>94349622
>>94355935
>circles the gmilf
I like your style.
>>94348187
this is /co/, the thread
>>94355935
>fuckable
i dont know anon.
i mean, to each their own, but...
>>94356029
tits or gtfo
>>94356044
>not wanting a mommy gf who needs to get manually lubed up for intercourse
How are you fuckers missing lower left in your circles? She's cute as fuck, got that Emilia Clark thing going for her
>>94355531
>He actually thinks shit-talking people's looks is confined to neckbeards.
I think you're the one that needs to get out more.
>>94356483
Emilia Clark is ugly for an actor. I will never get you people. I'd rather fuck most of the rest of the GoT female cast over her. Her face is weird, man.
>>94356153
>>94356483
Over half this staff are reasonably attractive. For some reason people just aren't going for that. She blends in too well?
And I could swear that blond woman top-left is watching us.
>>94354431
because photomaster, they can't be seen that far in the back.
>>94356574
She's not the most attractive actress, but she's pretty hot if you're talking about all women. She has a cute as fuck smile, which is what lower-left actually has going on. Lower-left also doesn't have Clark's insane caterpillar eyebrows, which is Clark's really big flaw
>>94348803
come on now, you should know better by now.
>>94350395
Make way ya plebs. Patrician Passing through.
>>94356793
Good taste
>>94349555
>Listen, if you think you can change decades old societal problems by buying stuff then you're an idiot.
Half true.
One of the things that make the progressives so tough to topple is the disparity in funds between the progressives and the anti-progressives. The progressives literally have billions of dollars to hire people, work out of fancy studios, distribute propaganda, and cooperate to make it look like they ARE the culture. If their propaganda makes money, that's great for increasing the pressure on following their agenda. Meanwhile, the anti-progressives are struggling to build infrastructure in an environment that's trying to make it as difficult for them as possible.
Money and entrepreneurs who are ready to make good use of it are going to be key points in where the culture goes from here.
>That just shows how much smarter they are!
Not really. Most of the time, Marxists don't build, they infiltrate things that already exist, open the floodgates for their buddies, intimidate people who are not their buddies, and then try to claim credit as they run what they've seized into the ground. What they are is motivated to organize. If they're smart, then it's in the manner that's least productive for society.
>>94348187
Fuck them with this made up bullshit. A few idiots start trolling and suddenly it becomes a fucking gender issue. Here is what I think about their fucking milkshake bullshit.
Female writers are not the issue, shitty editors are as well as people using what fucking shit posting trolls do as a fucking marketing tool.
>>94348187
Not every comicbook is in the action genre.
But superhero comics are firmly in the action genre.
They are about physical conflict resolution.
Women aren't as prone to violence.
Women don't like action focused media.
Women like romance and socialization in general.
You may as well be asking them to work on an oil rig, coal mine or in the armed forces.
There is confidence and then there is trying to vainly ignore sexual dimorphism and millions of years of behavioral conditioning.