The Emoji movie now has a 3% on Rotten tomatoes

File: 1429226513140.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

Finally something that makes Fantastic Four look good by comparison

>>94231444
DOX DOX DOZ DOX DOX DIX DOX DOX DOX

>Common Sense Media
That pretty much means it's okay to show your kids. Not that it's good.

Common Sense Media. It's just a name, they don't actually have any common sense.

>>94231505

Don't you mean Fantastic 4%?

>>94231845

apparently it has since gone up to 9%

File: YOU BASTARD.png (30KB, 359x268px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 359x268px

It's 6% now...

>>94231444
still waiting on Armond White's review

will his contrarianism overcome his hatred for animation?

>>94232058
Don't call it a comeback

>>94232058
>Full review in Spanish
Fucking spics.

>>94232058
She's gotta go back

File: 2017-07-28-19-18-www.rottentomatoes.com.png (12KB, 503x73px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 503x73px

>Critics Consensus:
My fucking sides

Is this the biggest bomb ever? What were they thinking?

SONY IS SAVED

>>94232058
Spic here. This beaner needs to get ICEd for real.

>>94231444
>>94232058
Based

>>94231577
This.

>>94231444
What was it at before?

>>94232821
0%

Metacritic score
9

>>94232844
Oh wow.

>>94232058
That's actually a nice review.

>>94232453
Nope. Can't handle.

>>94232058
WALL

Well, at least it's still worse than "Norm of the North".

>>94232058
A SECOND FRESH REVIEW!

File: dennis.gif (987KB, 229x176px) Image search: [Google]

987KB, 229x176px

>>94231444
Heheheheh... Irony.

>>94232453
It's not a bomb yet. Wait until it's tanking in the box office and merchandise is put in the clearance bin. Remember, the type of people who communicate with emojis are retarded, they're not likely to be out off by negative reviews.

>>94231444
I knew it'd get above 0% because of the SJW messages

Honestly I feel like a 0% is less awful in some ways than a single digit ranking simply because the latter means that more people have seen the film.

>>94231577
common sense media shouldn't be counted in RT, they don't review movies based on quality like other critics of the site.

>>94233667
What critics review based on quality?

File: 1474766731138.gif (348KB, 350x233px) Image search: [Google]

348KB, 350x233px

>>94232058

>>94232849
Brutal.

>>94231444
Okay big guy, how about YOU make a story about emojis and make it work!

>>94235318
It's physically impossible for anyone to do that

File: 16!.png (126KB, 500x732px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 500x732px

>>94231444
And it has a 16% on google.

>>94231505
The Emoji Movie is actually pretty good no one just wants to voice their real thoughts on it in fear of angry commies getting butthurt about it.

>>94232084
Didnt he like some animated movies like Coraline, Tintin and the Simpsons? I think his hateboner is reserved almost exclusively for Pixar movies.

>>94235318
>Okay big guy, how about YOU make a story about emojis and make it work!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coplvlOBWaQ

>>94235318
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=chBTwDdNVio

>>94231532
Grow up.

Anyone else getting the feeling that many of the negative user reviews are just people giving it shit like Diablo III or MS3?
Like I doubt the movie is even good but it seems more mediocre than anything, the shit I'm seeing is brutal.

>>94232453
No if anything this is what Sony wants. Just look at all the discussion and memeing about when it comes to this movie. They probably hope this movie will make money out of people seeing it ironically and those who want to see just how bad it really is.

>>94235622
Do at least the kids care about this movie?

>>94235512
Here's your (You). Nobody's falling for the bait.

>>94235657
Not from what I've heard

File: not real socialism.gif (3MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 320x240px

>>94235660
I'm not baiting this movie at worse is mediocre but because it comes from a big corporation and is about a product all you stupid ass commies have to pretend it's literally worse than Hitler. Grow up.

>>94235715
>you stupid ass commies
>pretty good
>mediocre
>grow up
You're contradicting yourself and you're telling me to grow up. Nobody's falling for your terrible fucking bait.

File: They were too mercyful to Foodfight.png (43KB, 1042x359px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 1042x359px

>>94231577

>>94233667
>they don't review movies based on quality like other critics of the site.

They actually rate quality, each movie page has an small section called "is it good?" that it's the review that counts towards RT, but they seem to be very lenient towards animated movies, they do trash bad live-action movies more often though.

>>94235715
I thought redditors were liberals. In venezuela liberals=capitalists.

>>94231444
Tomorrow's the only other day this movie can make back the budget. It's only got 1/5 of what was used to make it and that's not counting the marketing. If the movie doesn't get $40 million or more, we can call this a financial failure.

>>94235527
>Mojicons
is this Кoлoбaнгa?

>>94235715
That's what the no good godless commies want you to think.

It they had their way, we would have to see every movie equally and this would have the same reviews and monetary success as something like Spiderman 2.

File: evil dead.png (40KB, 1039x332px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 1039x332px

>>94235747

Also they have usually surprisingly good taste for a website that it's aimed towards helping parents know what movies don't have sex scenes in it so their kids can watch them.

File: wtf.png (14KB, 853x140px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 853x140px

>>94231444

WTF

I love Betsy Bozdech now!

>>94235641
i hope people are smart enough to actually read the reviews saying it's not so-bad-it's-good bad, but so-dull-it's-nothing bad

File: displeased-wee-yu.jpg (25KB, 675x287px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 675x287px

>>94236399

>Kung Pow is at 11%

File: aw.png (22KB, 122x122px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 122x122px

>>94231444
*adds 3%*

>>94234444
Quad 4s don't lie, prep the catapult!

Fuck you, Betsy Bozdech. You have personally wronged the entire medium of cinema and animation.

>>94239379
Can't wait to see how Armond spins this movie to be fresh.

What are the odds that Sony is going to shut down their film division now? I really want to see Sony die.

>>94239241
Critics have always been unfairly harsh on comedies.

>>94239881
I've also found the comedies movie critics actually like are (generally) boring as fuck and try to shove too much drama in.

Look, if I want to cry and feel bad, I'll watch an actual drama, not this "dramadey" bull.

>>94232058
Maybe she's a Spaniard? You realize not all spanish names are beaner names

>>94232058
Probably a snapchat thot that uses a fuck ton of emojis in her one FB post.

>>94239982
but spaniards know that other spaniards speak english like everybody else in the first world
it has to be a hispanic knowing her people refuse to learn the language that everyone important agreed would be the standard one for interacting with each other

>>94232058
BUILD A WALL

>>94232177
>>94232301
>>94233255
>>94234444
Go back to pol

>>94239379
>>94239452
The worst part is that he might actually do it.

File: smug dan aykroyd.jpg (37KB, 560x374px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 560x374px

How the fuck does RT even determine if a score is rotten or fresh? That's the biggest bullshit about the RT score that everyone is slappin on their films.

These fuckers put a review that literally says "meh" as a positive.

>>94240384
If you want to watch our cartoons, you have to be legal, Pedro.

>>94240703
>How the fuck does RT even determine if a score is rotten or fresh?
If it's ambiguous, like a 2.5 out of five or something, they just contact the reviewer and ask tgem.

please god don't let this make a profit

if ghost busters failed this can too

>>94240703
>>94240724
wait, reviewers don't set their own score? you're joking

>>94232058
If you're gonna post reviewers being contrarian for recognition, at least black out the name.