Any word on Soule defecting back to DC?

>>94227962
he went to shit after Swamp Thing. Marvel can keep him

>>94227962
Why would we want "Peanut Allergy" Soule and "Matt Murdock is an atheist" back?

>>94228054
>>94228114

I see no reason why he couldn't redeem himself back on DC, where he clearly belongs.

they all come back eventually

>>94228114
>"Peanut Allergy" Soule
What's this about?

>>94228230
mutant killer cloud was no more dangerous than peanut allergy so inhumans were right to keep the killer cloud around.

>>94228054
i really liked Strange Attractors

>>94228299
I don't read Marvel and you just referenced a lot of terms I don't know. How can it be a killer cloud if it isn't dangerous?

>>94228335
It's just angry X-fags It was a shit even though, so they have a right to be angry. Still, only one issue in and Soule seems to know how to write a good story with Astonishing

>>94228230
>Q: Was it expected that the Inhumans would be perceived as having an equally valid, or even sympathetic, viewpoint after “Death of X,” when the stakes ultimately came down to their having to make significant cultural adjustments in a new environment vs. the slow, painful death of an established population?


>A: The mutants don’t have to touch Terrigen at all, which means the problem is really of a limited scale to them. So, the idea that the Inhumans should destroy their entire (20,000+ years) cultural legacy because mutants have a problem with Terrigen… I think it’s understandable that they would take a wait-and-see approach, and try to find another solution.
>o explain another way — there are kids with deadly peanut allergies. We don’t implement a worldwide ban on peanut butter or Snickers. We just make sure those particular kids stay away from peanuts. This is that exact situation. Now, we’ll see what happens in “IvX”…
http://www.cbr.com/x-position-charles-soule-x-men-inhumans/