Do you agree with this, /co/? Or would you still do a 3rd season?

File: Gravity_Falls_logo.png (91KB, 300x172px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 300x172px

>>91457228
>The main hook of the show plotwise was the mystery surrounding the books and Stan. Once that was resolved halfway through season 2 it stopped being interesting. The big finale felt more like a formality than a climax, though it had some decent moments.

>And while the show was funny it followed a formula, which worked well but would get tiresome with a third season. The characters' gags were getting played out too by the end. Ending it at Season 2 was a good choice in that regard because it wrapped itself up before it got boring. Maybe a Season 3 could work if it had a big twist or changed up the main cast, but at that point you're changing the core of the show and that wouldn't mesh with its narrative focus.

>The only thing that really bothered me about the show that I'd go back and alter was how Wendy was handled. Despite being presented as a main character she existed as a plot device in Season 1 and was barely allowed to contribute to the plot in Season 2. Let her be the cool older sister she was in The Bunker instead of a romantic subplot, it worked better.