Was Capitalism a mistake?

Only if this movie is successful.

If it flops and Sony gets their asses handed to them, then no.

Capitalism was never a mistake. Emojis were

File: Sony in a nutshell.png (631KB, 900x720px) Image search: [Google]

631KB, 900x720px

>>93976326
No, but Sony is.

>>93976326
Unchecked unregulated capitalism is.

>>93976326
This money will make obscene amounts of money, proving that it is not a mistake.

>>93976853
Understandable. It works when the machine is checked and known. It doesn't when it is unregulated

No, Amy Pascal is.

>>93976897
Reminder she wanted to make the horse movie a shitty Smurfs ripoff.

>>93976919

Oh, I don't doubt it. The woman is incompetent.

benevolent dictator > national socialism > civic nationalism > libertarian capitalism

>>93976326
A specter is haunting /co/

>>93976326
Just which form of (((capitalism))) are we talking about here, OP? Because I am aware of a very prevalent majority in the entertainment industry, especially Hollywood, that are the biggest enthusiasts of toilet humor.

>tfw this movie might not be so bad if it weren't for the strange rise in popularity of a shit emoji within the recent times

>>93977024

God I wish Doctor Doom ruled America

>>93976853
Regulations kill the free market!

>>93976326
no, it brough you your longer lifespan better jobs and a better world generally. That said it think regulations are necessary and I would even argue for comprehensive large scale government run social programs.

regardless, The Emoji Movie is really just an attempt for sony to try and seize a currently popular property that originated in japan and isn;t really owned by any individual group or person.

for a movie studio it's kind of perfect. It's a huge property known by everyone around the wolrd, but due to it's history it doesn't really have a single owner and can simply be taken.


I hope the movie fails though, it's a shit idea.