LOL

Ok?

I find it funny they use green squares.

>>93812985
Spidey's suit is looking even more Ditko in that image. Obviously it's pre-vis and whatever else but the black arm bands are gone and the web lines seem darker and more prominent. I like the changes.

>>93812985
boy if it were DC doing this I'd call it a clusterfuck of epic proportions

but since it's based marvel and they've never made a bad movie I'm hyped af

BRING ON D23 AND COMICCON

>>93812985
What are you trying to show me, OP?

>>93813064

Wrong terminology. In the industry we call pre-vis, pre visualization when we stage the production prior to principal photography, may it be with cuts from other movies, storyboards or 3d animation like how we do nowadays.

File: tooybqoivwop1ah3hj7w.jpg (25KB, 620x470px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 620x470px

>>93812985

Also, I think this is from Civil War not Infinity War

>>93813137
It is the BP costume from CW and not the new one from the BP film.

>>93813113
Ok thanks. I just talk about comic books on the internet.

Wasn't black panthers suit entirely CG in Civil War?

>>93813164

Yeah, so the OPs image is from CW not IW.

File: 12-black-panther-4.w529.h352.2x.jpg (31KB, 871x579px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 871x579px

>>93813172

Nope, it was touched up in post-production

I still remember the autistic cries of oldfags.

File: cgpanther.png (408KB, 846x365px) Image search: [Google]

408KB, 846x365px

>>93813172
Yes. It's a fascinating process too. They had the stunt man and actor perform all the Black Panther scenes and then had the VFX department "paint" over the suit to give it a unique look.

It looks so crisp and real so I wonder why this process isn't used for Spider Man in both CW and Homecoming. There are scenes were Spidey looks straight up like a PS4 character.

File: embarrassing.webm (1MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x720px

>>93812985
>meanwhile no one can post behind the scenes shit for JUSTass League because it's all on a soundstage using shitty greenscreens instead of anything real

File: SUPERMAN.jpg (133KB, 400x266px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 400x266px

>>93812985
>Backstage pictures of effects heavy blockbuster movies look a bit silly, don't they?
Well no shit, familia.

>>93813235
White Panther looks baller as fuck.

>>93813238
This new hobbit sequel looks bad.

>>93813238
I assume it's because this is from the first trailer and there's still a ton of work to be done on the film then, but man this shot is weird. Especially the way it seems like it's in a huge void. Like an early access game made in the Unreal engine where they have access to quality assests but haven't really put the work in to have anything more than the are bones of a setting.

File: 1465521318368.webm (3MB, 800x334px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 800x334px

>>93813437
this is WB they don't have money to work on CG

what you see is what you get

>>93813473
To be fair, this was cut from the movie (not that it helped much, still a terrible film).

>>93813528
There was so little audiences wanted out of the Hobbit films and Hackson failed to deliver on almost all of it.

>>93813891
He was clearly misirable during production after the first one, and never wanted to come back in the first place. I kinda feel sorry for him more than anything, it was clearly a studio-interference mess that got churned out, but he could have tried a little.
Alfred is basically unforgivable though.

File: sad gollum.jpg (19KB, 249x212px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 249x212px

>>93813891
>>93813943
>tfw the 1977 animated version that's only an hour long managed to be better paced and more faithful to the book than the nine hour trilogy
Feels bad *gollum*

>>93814546
>*gollum*
>**
Don't do that.

>>93814580
If you can think of a better way to indicate making a non-speech utterance in text, I'd love to hear it.

... sarcasm-indicating punctuation would also be useful.

>>93814709
>...
Stooooop doing this stuff

>>93812985

OH MY GOD THIS MOVIE IS GONNA BE AWFUL until the CGI is finished

File: 1473097687665.png (341KB, 750x422px) Image search: [Google]

341KB, 750x422px

>>93813064
>and the web lines seem darker and more prominent.

Because before they altered the design the webs were convex, like the Raimi suit.

>>93813235
Jesus CHRIST, that costume is cool as shit. He needs that for cold weather missions. My god...and is that foam muscle or actually his build?

>>93814776
*grabs you by the throat* back the FUCK off?!?!?

>>93815641
you ready for this?

that's entirely the wireframe cgi on top of it

he wore the practical suit, then they went over it and painted it to digitally enhanced it, frame by frame

i had no clue it was digital before i saw the behind the scenes stuff. which gives the late spidey addition theory proof. they had the pre-viz stuff ready for panther, bucky's arm, stark/rhodey, etc but didn't have enough preptime with spidey, which is why he looks off

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vIZh8k8CnI

>>93815641

Do we know what the Hatut Zeraze are going to look like yet? They basically wear white versions of BP's suit with tactical shit on top.

>>93813235
It's because Spider-man's costume is bright red. Red on right clothing is hard to get to look right on the screen.

>>93813380
>hobbit sequel

w-what

>>93815914
*breaks free and unsheathes katana*
You won't win that easy

>>93812985
>>93813137
>>93815417
I like that spider logo better but I don't like the raised webbing

>>93812985
Why do the costumes look so bad here??
Is that holland and boswick?