so why is this the best version of sonic while other cartoons do such a bad job?
Was it because it was made in 1999?
>Simple, classic design
>Only Sonic, Tails & Knuckles.
>Well animated
>Great OST
>Metal Sonic was great
>Wasn't aimed only for kids
>>93567277
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZK82EmKzXEk
>>93567277
>1999
It was in 1996.
>>93567277
>that grainy quality
The 90s were shit.
Long live the 2000s
>>93569314
Anon is a nigger.
>>93569090
>Only Sonic, Tails & Knuckles.
>And some owl, the president's catgirl daughter, and the president
Eat a dick Motoroach.
>>93569442
I'm a Slav. :))
Am I the only one who this that film is terrible?
Good classic designs does not mean a good film
>>93569588
I loved the OVA, but muh classic designs & muh Sonic/Tails/Knuckles only had jack shit to do with it. It was just a very fun Sonic film that didn't have a lot of the stuff that made Underground or X bad.
>>93569469
>And Robotnik
>>93569588
I agree.
It was underwhelming both in animation(not art) and story.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9fHGdR1IyM
>>93569090
Should've had Amy, too, to be desu. She was introduced with Metal Sonic in the games.
>>93571551
Best Robotnik in animation (disregarding aosth because offbrand)
I don't understand how such a simple elegant design never translated to other spinoff material