Is this the most forgettable pixar film of all time?
What is?
I forget.
Fuck off I love this movie. Better than every Toy Story.
>>93469796
The was cute but I hated the dinosaur. How can movie fail so hard to make a dino unlikable?
Too be fair. Inside out was also not very good.
>>93469796
It is boring and very forgettable.
>Pixar is close to not having made a stand out film in over a decade
What about Brave?
>>93470052
>What is Inside Out
>>93469911
forgettable =/= bad
>>93470158
Tht was pixar?
>>93470201
no, it was Disney.
>>93470201
Yes
>>93469796
well, it's not THAT bad
>>93469921
>Inside out was also not very good.
>>93470185
Overrated shit that people pretend was good.
>>93470330
There isn't even a villain or any stakes.
>Girl moves
>Girl sad
>Girl runs away
>Girl changes mind
>happy ending
>Lesson: Somtimes sad is good
>>93470330
>>93470185
I didnt "feel" it. I forgot it the moment i left the cinema.
>>93470410
The thing with Inside Out is that people were so desperate for a good Pixar movie that they pretended they acted like the least mediocre one in years was some masterpiece.
>>93470330
For a film about the psyche it was completely and utterly lacking in imagination and subtlety. The emotional ending was effective, but other that the only reason people remember it is for projecting onto like an astrological reading.
>>93469796
Better than any of the Cars, Inside Out, and Finding Dory.
Of course, I love Westerns, Dinosaurs, and I was flying to my father's funeral when I actually managed to watch it.
It hit me like a semitrailer.
>>93470361
>>93470410
>>93470422
>>93470446
>>93470449
Oh this is a troll thread. For a moment I thought you guys were actually serious.
>>93469796
I don't know but I love the rancher t-rexes
>>93470559
take off your fanboy glasses, please.
we are serious.
>>93470361
>pretend was good.
Is this what /co/ is going with now?
>>93470410
>There isn't even a villain or any stakes.
Movies don't have to have this to be good. I'm not sure how that's a mark against it.
>>93470446
>They're pretending that its good
Get better bait next time
>>93470449
>Arm-chair critic response
>>93470612
>Movies don't have to have this to be good. I'm not sure how that's a mark against it.
Sure, It doesn't have to suck but it did. Boring plot aside it didn't even look good. The city was good but her brain world was as interesting as a Bust-A-Move level.
Finding Dory is literally just a retread of Finding Nemo, jokes and all, but worse.
>>93470200
If that's the case then I'd say Toy Story 2 is the one nobody ever talks about. Even though it's really good.
Shit, people ate up 3 mostly because they'd forgotten 2 already did the same goddamn story.
>>93470754
well, we can say same about TS2/TS3.
Waitmin.. what's Cars 3 about?
>>93470866
From what I've heard it's basically the same as the first movie. Which is actually a relief given how godawful the second one was.
>>93470361
For it to be overrated means it stood out though
>>93470982
isn't this movie about leaving "legacy" and leaving room to someone else?
>>93470866
>well, we can say same about TS2/TS3.
Not to the extent of Finding Dory. Yes sure they share the same themes but Toy Story 2 had an A plot that is made to develop new characters and introduce the new questions and themes of abandonment and what eventually happens to toys and their relationship with children when they grow up, and this is cut up with a more comedic B-plot that follows the odyssey of Buzz and the other toys trying to rescue Woody. Meanwhile Toy Story 3 was basically a grim prison break movie with a focused A-plot and they expected you to be aware of the themes introduced in 2 and it's the toys finally going through the sad implications that was brought up in 2.
Finding Dory meanwhile is a beat by beat recreation of Nemo. People complain The Force Awakens was uninspired but Finding Dory cranks that shit up to 11. Whole scenes and spectacles are remade and even jokes get directly copied.
>>93471135
desu i didnt see FD because of this, watching comedy relief: the movie is always such chore.
>>93471053
I'm surprised the movie didn't put McQueen in the role of mentor and Storm in McQueen's role of the first movie
>>93471217
nahhh, grrrl power was a better idea.
>>93469796
they should've made it about a loli cave person
then at lest it'll be remember for its fanart
>>93469796
Worst movie I've seen honestly. If I'm constantly checking the time bar on a movie, it fails. At least shit like Sausage Party or Ice Age 5 weren't dull.
so, did Disney syphoned talents from Pixar or is it Pixar that ran out of creative juice?
>>93469796
>>93472122
good thing they dont have RT scores, or the last row would be ver sad
>>93470185
People stopped talking about it 2 days after it released
>>93470559
>i can't refute the facts
>better yell troll
Lmao, nice damage control
Does this movie have.... rule34?
Because there definitely is a connection between no fappable characters and no interest in the movie
>>93473350
What kind of conclusion is that? Then, explain Finding Nemo.
>>93470449
>>93470446
The rumor that Inside Out's being shoved into Epcot's Imagination ride rather then the Dreamfinder/Figment reboot the Imagineers and fandom have all wanted is very distressing to me.
The OG Imagination ride was a fantastic way of conveying the creative process and what you can do with it. Inside Out's take on the Imagination was just a generic amusement park with a "The Floor is Lava Experience" and "The Husbando Generator"
>>93469796
It was pretty good, but not so good I'd encourage people to see it.
But then again, wasn't Planes Pixar too?I don't even remember it being announced when it released.