What will you and Demencia do in 3D?

Keeping things low poly is an admirable endeavor, but this is a bit too much. We aren't running N64's anymore and you need polys in key places so that things bend properly. Them arms and legs gonna fold into each other.

>>93382123
What is this for? A game?

File: low bend.jpg (81KB, 1095x736px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 1095x736px

If you're going to fall for the low poly meme at least do it correctly.
The solution on the right provides natural bends.

There's no way in hell that model will be able to do anything other than a static T-pose.

cankles

>>93382123
Complain about the death of traditional animation

>>93383415
You can make what appears to be a circle from a very high number of short lines.

>>93383415
Almost exclusively yes. In the same way science that's advanced enough can seem like magic, you slap enough polygons on something to make it look smooth.

Alternatives that aren't widely used exist and can be seen in games like Cube World (voxels) or point cloud rendering (Dreams PS4)

>>93382123
Be pig disgusting.

>>93383415
Of course they still use polygons, what else is there? Ray-casted nurbs?

The key difference between video game graphics now and video game graphics from the, say, PS2 era is that they use high definition textures with sophisticated rendering algorithms which convincingly create the appearance of far more detailed geometry than can be rendered in real-time using polygons. That and just plain more polygons, of course.

It's like how everything is still just a bunch of pixels on the screen, but we've come a long way since the NES.

>>93383415
Yes, but modern games are powerful enough to use a bunch of techniques to make them look better than older models. Things like bump mapping can completely eliminate the "polygonal" look of a model when used well.

>>93383415

more polys and this >>93383781

also, low poly is an art. Just like pixelshit but low poly is more respected in professional circles.